Metafory konceptualne: fenomeny umysłu czy konstrukty kognitywistyczne? Cz. II
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/LV.15.2020.29.02Keywords:
psychology of language, psycholinguistics, semantics, cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphorAbstract
Conceptual metaphors: phenomena of the mind or cognitive constructs? Part II
The author reviewed experimental studies of language metaphor, starting with the pioneer publication of Roman Jakobson from 1965. It has been shown that experimental studies confirm the postulates of G. Lakoff’s and M. Johnson’s cognitive theory of metaphor to varying degrees (more or less). The author also presents the results of a psycholinguistic experiment involving 280 respondents. The experiment based on the verbal-nominal constructions of the modern Polish language showed low consistency of answers, as well as the lack of arguments that the interpretation of metaphorical expressions (i.e. with the participation of polysemant) by respondents is not based on so-called conceptual metaphors.
Downloads
References
Apresân Û.D., 1966, Idei i metody strukturnoj lingvistiki (kratkij očerk), Moskva.
View in Google Scholar
Blasko D.G., Connine C., 1993, Effects of Familiarity and Aptness on Metaphor Processing, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition” 19, nr 2, s. 295–308, https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.295.
View in Google Scholar
Bogusławski A., 1983, Interpretacja nieliteralna, metafora, proporcja analogiczna, [w:] M. Głowiński, A. Okopień-Sławińska (red.), Studia o metaforze II, Wrocław, s. 63–88.
View in Google Scholar
Boroditsky L., Ramscar M., 2002, The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought, „Psychological Science” 13, nr 2, s. 185–189, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00434.
View in Google Scholar
Casasanto D., Boroditsky L., 2008, Time in the Mind: Using Space to Think about Time, „Cognition” 106, nr 2, s. 579–593, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004.
View in Google Scholar
Costello F.J., 2002, Investigating Creative Language: People’s Choice of Words in the Production of Novel Noun-Noun Compounds, [w:] W.D. Gray, C.D. Schunn (red.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, s. 232–237, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315782379-77.
View in Google Scholar
Drouillet L., Stefaniak N., Declercq Ch., Obert A., 2018, Role of Implicit Learning Abilities in Metaphor Understanding, „Consciousness and Cognition” 61, s. 13–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.03.015.
View in Google Scholar
Gentner D., Bowdle B.F., 2001, Convention, Form, and Figurative Language Processing, „Metaphor & Symbol” 16, nr 3–4, s. 223–247.
View in Google Scholar
Gentner D., Wolff P., 2000, Metaphor and Knowledge Change, [w:] E. Dietrich, A.B. Markman (red.), Cognitive Dynamics: Conceptual Change in Humans and Machines, Mahwah, s. 295–342.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., 1990, Psycholinguistic Studies on the Conceptual Basis of Idiomaticity, ,,Cognitive Linguistics” 1, nr 4, s. 417–451, https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.4.417.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., 1995, Idiomaticity and Human Cognition, [w:] M. Everaert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk, R. Schreuder (red.), Idioms. Structural and Psychological Perspectives, Hillsdale, s. 97–117.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., 1996, Why Many Concepts Are Metaphorical, „Cognition” 61, nr 3, s. 309–319, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00723-8.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., 1997, Taking Metaphor out of our Heads and Putting into the Cultural World, [w:] R.W. Gibbs, G.I. Steen (red.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistic. Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, July 1997, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, s. 145–166.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., 2003, Embodiment Experience and Linguistic Meaning, „Brain and Language” 84, nr 1, s. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00517-5.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., 2009, Why Do Some People Dislike Conceptual Metaphor Theory?, „Cognitive Semiotics” 5, nr 1–2, s. 14–36, https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.14.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., 2013, The Real Complexities of Psycholinguistic Research on Metaphor, „Language Sciences” 40, s. 45–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.03.001.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., Matlock T., 2001, Psycholinguistic Perspectives on Polysemy, [w:] H. Cuyckens, B. Zawada (red.), Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics. Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, s. 213–240, https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.177.10gib.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., O’Brien J., 1990, Idioms and Mental Imagery: The Metaphorical Motivation for Idiomatic Meaning, „Cognition” 36, nr 1, s. 35–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90053-M.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., Steen G.I. (red.), 1997, Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistic. Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, July 1997, Amsterdam – Philadelphia.
View in Google Scholar
Giora R., 2003, On Our Mind. Salience, Context, and Figurative Language, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Giora R., Fein O., 1999, On Understanding Familiar and Less-Familiar Figurative Language, „Journal of Pragmatics” 31, nr 12, s. 1601–1618, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00006-5.
View in Google Scholar
Glucksberg S., 1991, Beyond Literal Meanings: The Psychology of Allusion, „Psychological Science” 2, nr 3, s. 146–152, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00122.x.
View in Google Scholar
Glucksberg S., 2003, The Psycholinguistics of Metaphor, „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 7, nr 2, s. 92–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00040-2.
View in Google Scholar
Glucksberg S., Keysar B., 1990, Understanding Metaphorical Comparisons: Beyond Similarity, „Psychological Review” 97, nr 1, s. 3–18, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3.
View in Google Scholar
Gong S.-P., Ahrens K., 2007, Processing Conceptual Metaphors in On-Going Discourse, „Metaphor & Symbol” 22, nr 4, s. 313–330, https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701528121.
View in Google Scholar
Handl S., Schmid H.-J. (red.), 2011, Windows to the Mind. Metaphor, Metonymy and Conceptual Blending, Berlin – New York.
View in Google Scholar
Jakobson R., 1989, W poszukiwaniu istoty języka. Wybór pism, t. 1, wybór, red. nauk. i wstęp M.R. Mayenowa, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Johnson M., 1987, The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason, Chicago.
View in Google Scholar
Juszczyk K., 2017, Mądrość metafory. Komunikacyjny model metafory kognitywnej, Poznań.
View in Google Scholar
Kertész A., Rákosi C., Csatár P., 2012, Data, Problems, Heuristic and Results in Cognitive Metaphor Research, „Language Sciences” 34, nr 6, s. 715–727, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.011.
View in Google Scholar
Keysar B., Bly B., 1999, Swimming against the Current: Do Idioms Reflect Conceptual Structure?, „Journal of Pragmatics” 31, nr 12, s. 1559–1578, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00004-1.
View in Google Scholar
Keysar B., Shen Y., Glucksberg S., Horton W.S., 2000, Conventional Language: How Metaphorical Is It?, „Journal of Memory and Language” 43, nr 4, s. 576–593, https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2711.
View in Google Scholar
Lachaud C.M., 2013, Conceptual Metaphor and Embodied Cognition: EEG Coherence Reveals Brain Activity Differences between Primary and Complex Conceptual Metaphors during Comprehension, „Cognitive Systems Research” 22–23, s. 12–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2012.08.003.
View in Google Scholar
Leŝeva L.M., 2014, Leksičeskaâ polisemiâ v kognitivnom aspekte, Moskva.
View in Google Scholar
Libben G., Gibson M., Yoon Y.B., Sandra D., 2003, Compound Fracture: The Role of Semantic Transparency and Morphological Headedness, „Brain and Language” 84, nr 1, s. 50–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5.
View in Google Scholar
Lynott D., Keane M., 2003, The Role of Knowledge Support in Creating Noun-Noun Compounds, [w:] R. Alterman, D. Kirsh (red.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, s. 746–751.
View in Google Scholar
McGlone M.S., 1996, Conceptual Metaphors and Figurative Language Interpretation: Food for Thought?, „Journal of Memory and Language” 35, nr 4, s. 544–565, https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0029.
View in Google Scholar
Murphy G.L., 1996, On Metaphoric Representations, „Cognition” 60, nr 2, s. 173–204, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1.
View in Google Scholar
Nayak N., Gibbs R.W., 1990, Conceptual Knowledge in the Interpretation of Idioms, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: General” 119, nr 3, s. 315–330, https:///doi.org//10.1037/0096-3445.119.3.315.
View in Google Scholar
Pynte J., Besson M., Robichon F.H., Poli J., 1996, The Time-Course of Metaphor Comprehension: An Event-Related Potential Study, „Brain and Language” 55, nr 3, s. 293–316, https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0107.
View in Google Scholar
Rákosi C., 2012, The Fabulous Engine: Strengths and Flaws of Psycholinguistic Experiments, „Language Sciences” 34, nr 6, s. 682–701, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.009.
View in Google Scholar
Wierzbicka A., 2010, Semantyka. Jednostki elementarne i uniwersalne, tłum. A. Głaz, K. Korżyk, R. Tokarski, Lublin.
View in Google Scholar
Wolff P., Gentner D., 2000, Evidence for Role-Neutral Initial Processing of Metaphors, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition” 26, nr 2, s. 529–541, https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.529.
View in Google Scholar
