Funkcje emblematów w strukturze dialogu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/LV.08.2013.16.02Keywords:
speech-independent gestures, emblems, emotion icons, public discourse, Kendon’s ContinuumAbstract
Functions of emblems in the structure of a dialogue
So far, emblems have been considered a consistent and speech-independent gesture code. This paper attempts to track the function that they play in a natural dialogue. The footage we used to study emblematic gestures, contained such TV programmes where participants can be observed in the situation of unrehearsed dialogue, as it is then that the function of their emblematic gestures is enriched with additional elements such as a mental rapprochement of the interlocutors, and modifications of the syntactic flow of utterances. During the dialogue, speakers might also create new gestural illustrators which can become the seeds of new emblems. The paper also signals a new category of gestures, emotion icons, that were not recognized in previous classifications. Unlike the already known emotion indicators, they do not so much indicate the emotional state of the speaker, as mimic it in a gesture, and are an iconic expression that can even transform into an emblem of the given emotion.
Downloads
References
Antas J., 2001, Co mówią ręce. Wprowadzenie do komunikacji niewerbalnej, [w:] R. Przybylska, W. Przyczyna (red.), Retoryka dziś. Teoria i praktyka, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Antas J., 2006, Gesty – obrazy pojęć i schematy myśli, [w:] E. Tabakowska (red.), Ikoniczność znaku. Słowo – przedmiot – obraz – gest, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Antas J., 2013, Semantyczność ciała – gesty jako znaki myślenia, Łódź.
View in Google Scholar
Argyle M., 1988, Bodily Communication, Madison.
View in Google Scholar
Efron D., 1941, Gesture and Environment, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Ekman P., Friesen W.V., 1969, The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior: Categories, Origins, Usage, and Coding, „Semiotica” 1.
View in Google Scholar
Goossens L., 1995, Metaphtonymy: The Interaction of Metaphor and Metonymy in Figurative Expressions for Linguistic Action, [w:] L. Goossens (red.), By Word of Mouth. Metaphor, Metonymy and Linguistic Action in s Cognitive Perspective, Amsterdam.
View in Google Scholar
Hall E.T., 1976, Ukryty wymiar, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Jarząbek K., Gestykulacja i mimika. Słownik, Katowice.
View in Google Scholar
Kendon A., 1981, Nonverbal Communication, Interaction, and Gesture. Selection from Semiotica, Hague.
View in Google Scholar
Kendon A., 2005, Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
KJP PWN: Korpus języka polskiego PWN: http://korpus.pwn.pl
View in Google Scholar
Knapp M., Hall J., 2000, Komunikacja niewerbalna w interakcjach międzyludzkich, Wrocław.
View in Google Scholar
McNeill D., Gesture: A Psycholinguistic Approach, For Psycholinguistics Section, The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, http://mcneilllab.uchicago.edu/pdfs/gesture.a_psycholinguistic_approach.cambridge.encyclop.pdf; 22 IV 2013
View in Google Scholar
Morris D., 1993, Magia ciała, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Saitz R., Cervenka E., 1972, Handbook of Gestures: Columbia and the USA, Berlin.
View in Google Scholar
SJP: Słownik języka polskiego PWN: http://sjp.pwn.pl
View in Google Scholar
SJPD: W. Doroszewskiego (red.), Słownik języka polskiego, 1958–1969: http://doroszewski.pwn.pl
View in Google Scholar
Szczepaniak A., 2011, Kulturowe i pozakulturowe aspekty komunikacji niewerbalnej na przykładzie gestów używanych w Europie. Polsko-grecko-brytyjskie studium porównawcze, mszps pracy doktorskiej napisanej pod kierunkiem prof. dr hab. Anny Dąbrowskiej, Wrocław.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
