Estetyczne akty mowy jako przedmiot pragmalingwistyki: status, funkcje, formy

Cz. I

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/LV.16.2021.32.04

Keywords:

pragmalinguistics, speech acts, aesthetic speech acts, interactive operators, indirect affect- creating acts

Abstract

Aesthetic Acts of Speech as a Subject of Pragmalinguistics: Status, Functions, Forms. Part 1

In the paper, the status and features of aesthetic speech acts are discussed. They are a research phenomenon at the junction of two disciplines: pragmatics and stylistics. The authors treat aesthetic speech acts as these kinds of speech acts that are produced by the sender with an intention to make the receiver have an aesthetic experience, however, they are not limited solely to the field of literature. No performative verbs can be ascribed to them, therefore they may be categorized as indirect stimulating acts. Moreover, the aesthetic function performed by such speech acts is frequently accompanied by other linguistic functions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Admoni V.G., 1994, Sistema form rečevogo vyskazyvaniâ, Sankt-Peterburg.
View in Google Scholar

Adorno T.W., 1994, Teoria estetyczna, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Austin J.L., 1993, Mówienie i poznawanie. Rozprawy i wykłady filozoficzne, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Bauer Z., 2000, Gatunki dziennikarskie, [w:] idem, E. Chudziński (red.), Dziennikarstwo i świat mediów, wyd. 2 zm. i rozsz., Kraków, s. 143–173.
View in Google Scholar

Black E., 2006, Pragmatic Stylistics, Edinburgh.
View in Google Scholar

Dem’ânkov V.Z., 2016, Âzykovaâ kreativnost’ v hudožestvennom tvorčestve, „Trudy Instituta russkogo âzyka im. V.V. Vinogradova” 7 (4), s. 29–35.
View in Google Scholar

Dobrzyńska T., 2001, Od niespójności do (super)koherencji. Rola metatekstu w utworze literackim, [w:] A. Pajdzińska, R. Tokarski (red.), Semantyka tekstu artystycznego, Lublin, s. 47–57.
View in Google Scholar

Fedosûk M.Û., 1997, Issledovanie sredstv rečevogo vozdejstviâ i teoriâ žanrov rečy, [w:] V.E. Gol’din (red.), Žanry reči, Saratov, s. 66–88.
View in Google Scholar

Ginet C., 1979, Performativity, „Linguistics and Philosophy” 3, s. 245–265, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126512
View in Google Scholar

Głutkowska-Polniak A., 2017, Dizajn w kontekście estetyki. Jego początki, przeobrażenia i konotacje, „Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Śląskiego w Katowicach”, nr 3588, Katowice.
View in Google Scholar

Gumperz J.J., 1992, Contextualization and Understanding, [w:] A. Duranti, Ch. Goodwin (red.), Rethinking Context. Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Cambridge, s. 229–252.
View in Google Scholar

Heinemann W., Viehweger D., 1991, Textlinguistik. Eine Einführung, Tübingen, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111376387. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111376387
View in Google Scholar

Hobohm H.-Ch., 1991, Der ästhetische Text als Depositum von Weisheit, [w:] A. Assman (red.), Weisheit. Archäologie der literarischen Kommunikation III, München, s. 547–554.
View in Google Scholar

Huang Y., 2012, The Oxford Dictionary of Pragmatics, Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199697960.001.0001
View in Google Scholar

Johansen J.D., 2002, Literary Discourse: A Semiotic-Pragmatic Approach to Literature, Toronto, https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442676725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442676725
View in Google Scholar

Kazankova E.A., 2010, Korrelâcii meždu sostavom personažej i illokutivnoj strukturoj ih kommunikativnyh partij (na materiale povestej G. Ŝerbakovoj i L. Ulickoj), „Učenye zapiski UO VGU im. P.M. Mašerova” 10, s. 19–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11206230-000000000-00000
View in Google Scholar

Kiklewicz A., 2007, Zrozumieć język. Szkice z filozofii języka, semantyki, lingwistyki komunikacyjnej, Łask.
View in Google Scholar

Kiklewicz A., 2020, Fenomeny komunikacji (normy i dewiacje w zachowaniach językowych), Olsztyn.
View in Google Scholar

Leont’ev A.A., 1968, Obŝestvennye funkcii âzyka i ego funkcional’nye èkvivalenty, [w:] F.P. Filin (red.), Âzyk i obŝestvo, Moskva, s. 99–110.
View in Google Scholar

Levinson S.C., 2010, Pragmatyka, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Lisowska-Magdziarz M., 2019, Znaki na uwięzi. Od semiologii do semiotyki mediów, Kraków, https://doi.org/10.12797/9788381381178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/9788381381178
View in Google Scholar

Mastandrea S., 2015, How Emotions Shape Aesthetic Experiences, [w:] P.P.L. Tinio, J.K. Smith (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Psychology of Aesthetics and the Arts, Cambridge, s. 500–518, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139207058.024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139207058.024
View in Google Scholar

Maturana H.R., Varela F.J., 1987, The Tree of Knowledge. The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Boston.
View in Google Scholar

Meister J.C., 2008, Computing Action. A Narratological Approach, Berlin – New York.
View in Google Scholar

Mečkovskaâ N.B., 1996, Social’naâ lingvistika, Minsk.
View in Google Scholar

Mey J.L., 1999, When Voices Clash. A Study in Literary Pragmatics, Berlin, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110801415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110801415
View in Google Scholar

Mey J.L., 2001a, Literary Pragmatics, [w:] D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, H.E. Hamilton (red.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, London, s. 787–797, https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470753460.ch41
View in Google Scholar

Mey J.L. 2001b, Pragmatics: An Introduction, wyd. 2, Oxford – Malden.
View in Google Scholar

Morgan A., 2017, Solving the Puzzle of Aesthetic Assertion, „Southwest Philosophy Review” 33, nr 1, s. 95–103, https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview201733110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/swphilreview201733110
View in Google Scholar

Norrick N., 2001, On the Conversational Performance of Narrative Jokes: Toward an Account of Timing, „Humor” 14, s. 255–274, https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2001.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.2001.003
View in Google Scholar

Olsen S.H., Pettersson A. (red.), 2005, From Text to Literature. New Analytic and Pragmatic Approaches, London, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524170
View in Google Scholar

Petrey S., 1990, Speech Acts and Literary Theory, London.
View in Google Scholar

Pilkington A., 2010, Literary Pragmatics, [w:] L. Cummings (red.), The Pragmatics Encyclopedia, Abingdon, s. 251–253.
View in Google Scholar

Pisarkowa K., 1994, Z pragmatycznej stylistyki, semantyki i historii języka. Wybór zagadnień, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar

Potocka M.A., 2007, Estetyka kontra sztuka. Kompromitacja założeń estetycznych w konfrontacji ze sztuką nowoczesną, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Pratt M.L., 1977, Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse, Bloomigton – London.
View in Google Scholar

Sell R.D. (red.), 1991, Literary Pragmatics, London.
View in Google Scholar

Sil’man T., 1977, Zametki o lirike, Leningrad.
View in Google Scholar

Sławiński J., 1974, Dzieło. Język. Tradycja, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Stępnik K., 1988, Filozofia metafory, Lublin.
View in Google Scholar

Traugott E.C., 1973, Generative Semantics and the Concept of Literary Discourse, „Journal of Literary Semantics” 2, s. 5–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jlse.1973.2.1.5
View in Google Scholar

Vendler Z., 1976, Illocutionary Suicide, [w:] A.F. MacKay, D.D. Merrill (red.), Issues in the Philosophy of Language. Proceedings of the 1972 Oberlin Colloquium in Philosophy, New Haven, s. 135–145.
View in Google Scholar

Wanat T., 2006, Rola efektu pierwszeństwa w publikacjach prasowych, „Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” nr 1, s. 205–214.
View in Google Scholar

Zeller C., 2010, Ästhetik des Authentischen: Literatur und Kunst um 1970, Berlin – Boston, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110227215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110227215
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2021-11-18

Issue

Section

General Issues

How to Cite

Kiklewicz, A. and Przybyszewski, S. (2021) “Estetyczne akty mowy jako przedmiot pragmalingwistyki: status, funkcje, formy: Cz. I”, LingVaria, 16(2(32), pp. 31–43. doi:10.12797/LV.16.2021.32.04.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 102

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.