Polski bezokolicznik celu przy czasownikach ruchu

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/LV.18.2023.35.03

Keywords:

semantics, syntax, purpose structures, infinitive, grammaticalization

Abstract

POLISH INFINITIVE OF PURPOSE WITH MOTION VERBS

The authors of the article discuss Polish verbal constructions with an infinitive indicating the purpose of the motion, such as pobiegł otworzyć drzwi (he ran to open the door). In the first part of the study, the authors describe the research field, separating lexicalised expressions such as [ktoś] idzie spać ([someone] goes to sleep), (nie) idzie wytrzymać (it is hard to bear this), spieszę donieść, że… (I’m in a rush to report that…). The second part is devoted to the formal characteristics of structures with the infinitive of purpose. The semantic aspects of the studied structures are considered in the third part of the article. The authors present several arguments contradicting the common view that the analysed expressions and the corresponding structures with a subordinate purpose clause are synonymous. Part four of the study provides information on the status of the examined structures in contemporary Polish. Their formal and semantic properties suggest that they are products of a semantic-syntactic operation. In the last, fifth section of the article, the authors place Polish verbal constructions with the infinitive of purpose against a broader typological background, considering their relationship with similar expressions in other languages, which are at various stages of grammaticalization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amberer M., Baker B., Harvey M., 2010a, Complex Predicates. Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure, New York, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712234
View in Google Scholar

Amberer M., Baker B., Harvey M., 2010b, Introduction: Complex Predicates, [w:] idem (red.), Complex Predicates. Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure, New York, s. 1−12, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712234.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712234.002
View in Google Scholar

Austin J.L., 1993, Jak działać słowami?, [w:] idem, Mówienie i poznawanie. Rozprawy i wykłady filozoficzne, wstęp, przypisy, skorowidze B. Chwedeńczuk, Warszawa, s. 545−708.
View in Google Scholar

Bartnicka B., 1982, Funkcje semantyczno-składniowe bezokolicznika we współczesnej polszczyźnie, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Bąk P., 1984, Gramatyka języka polskiego. Zarys popularny, wyd. 4 popr., Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Binnick R.I., 1971, Will and be going to, „Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society” 7, s. 40−52.
View in Google Scholar

Bogusławski A., 1978, Towards an Operational Grammar, „Studia Semiotyczne” VIII, s. 29–90; pol. przekład: Preliminaria gramatyki operacyjnej, tłum. R. Gozdawa-Gołębiowski, „Polonica” XIII, s. 164‒223.
View in Google Scholar

Booij G., 2008, Constructional Idioms as Products of Linguistic Change: the aan het + infinitive Construction in Dutch, [w:] A. Bergs, G. Diewald (red.), Constructions and Language Change, Berlin, s. 79−104.
View in Google Scholar

Botne R., 2006, Motion, Time, and Tense: on the Grammaticalization of Come and Go to Future Markers in Bantu, „Studies in African Linguistics” 35/2, s. 127−188, https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v35i2.107307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32473/sal.v35i2.107307
View in Google Scholar

Bourdin P., 2008, On the Grammaticalization of Come and Go into Markers of Textual Connectivity, [w:] M. José López-Couso, E. Seoane (red.), Rethinking Grammaticalization: New Perspectives, Amsterdam, s. 37–59, https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.76.05bou. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.76.05bou
View in Google Scholar

Butt M., 2010, The Light Verb Jungle: Still Hacking Away, [w:] M. Amberer, B. Baker, M. Harvey (red.), Complex Predicates. Cross-Linguistic Perspectives on Event Structure, New York, s. 48−78, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712234.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511712234.004
View in Google Scholar

Bybee J., Perkins R., Pagliuca W., 1994, The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World, Chicago.
View in Google Scholar

Christensen L., 1997, Framtidsuttrycken i svenskans temporala system, Lund.
View in Google Scholar

Dahl Ö., 2000, The Grammar of Future Time Reference in European Languages, [w:] idem (red.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Berlin – New York, s. 309–328, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.2.309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.2.309
View in Google Scholar

Danchev A., 1990, Some Aspects of a Language Change Typology, [w:] W. Bahner, J. Schildt, D. Viehweger (red.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Congress of Linguists, Berlin/GDR, August 10−August 15, 1987, t. 2, Berlin, s. 1340−1342, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112578063-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112578063-131
View in Google Scholar

Danchev A., Kytö M., 2002, The go-Futures in English and French Viewed as an Areal Feature, „Nowele” 40, s. 29–60, https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.40.02dan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/nowele.40.02dan
View in Google Scholar

Devos M., van der Wal J. (red.), 2014, ‘Come’ and ‘Go’ off the Beaten Grammaticalization Path, Berlin – Boston, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110335989
View in Google Scholar

Dowty D., 2003, The Dual Analysis of Adjuncts/Complements in Categorial Grammar, [w:] E. Lang, C. Maienborn, C. Fabricius-Hansen (red.), Modifying (the Grammar of) Adjuncts: an Introduction, Berlin – Boston, s. 33−66, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894646.33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110894646.33
View in Google Scholar

Ebert K.H., 2000, Progressive Markers in Germanic Languages, [w:] Ö. Dahl (red.), Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Berlin, s. 605–653, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.4.605. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197099.4.605
View in Google Scholar

Gębka-Wolak M., 2011, Pozycje składniowe frazy bezokolicznikowej we współczesnym zdaniu polskim, Toruń.
View in Google Scholar

Goldberg A., Ackerman F., 2001, The Pragmatics of Obligatory Adjuncts, „Language” 77, s. 798−814, https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2001.0219
View in Google Scholar

Grochowski M., 1984, Składnia wyrażeń polipredykatywnych (Zarys problematyki), [w:] Z. Topolińska (red.), Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Składnia, Warszawa, s. 213–299.
View in Google Scholar

Grzegorczykowa R., 1967, O konstrukcjach z bezokolicznikiem przyczasownikowym w języku polskim, „Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego” XXV, s. 123−132.
View in Google Scholar

GWJP: Z. Topolińska (red.), Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Składnia, Warszawa 1984.
View in Google Scholar

Haegeman L., 1983, ‘Be going to’, ‘gaan’, and ‘aller’. Some Observations on the Expression of Future Time, „International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching” 21, s. 155−157.
View in Google Scholar

Haspelmath M., 1989, From Purposive to Infinitive – A Universal Path of Grammaticization, „Folia Linguistica Historica” 10/1–2, s. 287−310, https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.1989.10.1-2.287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/flih.1989.10.1-2.287
View in Google Scholar

Hilpert M., 2008, Where Did This Future Construction Come From? A Case Study of Swedish komma att V, [w:] A. Bergs, G. Diewald (red.), Constructions and Language Change, Berlin, s. 107−132.
View in Google Scholar

Hopper P.J., Traugott E.C., 1993, Grammaticalization, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar

ISJP: M. Bańko (red.), Inny słownik języka polskiego, t. 1–2, Warszawa 2000.
View in Google Scholar

Jespersen O., Christophersen P., Haislund N., Schibsbye K., 1954, A Modern English Grammar. On Historical Principles, cz. 6: Morphology, London.
View in Google Scholar

Jodłowski S., 1976, Podstawy polskiej składni, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Klemensiewicz Z., 1968, Zarys składni polskiej, wyd. 5, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Lakoff G., 1990, The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-Schemas?, „Cognitive Linguistics” 1/1, s. 39−74, https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39
View in Google Scholar

Leech G., 2004, Meaning and the English Verb, wyd. 3, Harlow.
View in Google Scholar

Los B., 2005, The Rise of the To-Infinitive, Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274765.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274765.001.0001
View in Google Scholar

Lotko E., 1964, Funkcje syntaktyczne bezokolicznika w gwarach zachodniocieszyńskich. Studium na tle porównawczym, Wrocław.
View in Google Scholar

Lühr R., 2017, The Emergence of Expressions for Purpose Relations in Older Indo-European Languages, [w:] Ł. Jędrzejowski, U. Demske (red.), Infinitives and the Syntax-Semantics Interface. A Diachronic Perspective, Berlin – Boston, s. 223−264, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110520583-009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110520583-009
View in Google Scholar

Maud D., van der Wal J., 2010, ‘Go’ on a Rare Grammaticalisation Path to Focus, „Linguistics in the Netherlands” 27, s. 45–58, https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.27.05dev. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.27.05dev
View in Google Scholar

Misz H., 1960, O pewnym rodzaju użycia bezokolicznika w dzisiejszym języku polskim, „Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Nauki Humanistyczno-Społeczne” nr 3, „Filologia Polska” 2, s. 37–51.
View in Google Scholar

Nagórko A., 2000, Zarys gramatyki polskiej (ze słowotwórstwem), wyd. 4, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego, praca zbiorowa, red. A. Przepiórkowski, M. Bańko, R.L. Górski, B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk, Warszawa 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Newman J. (red.), 2002, The Linguistics of Sitting, Standing and Lying. Amsterdam – Philadelphia, https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.51
View in Google Scholar

NKJP: Narodowy Korpus Języka Polskiego, [on-line:] www.nkjp.pl.
View in Google Scholar

Núñez Pertejo P., 1999, ‘Be Going To’ + Infinitive: Origin and Development. Some Relevant Cases from the Helsinki Corpus, „Studia Neophilologica” 72/2, s. 135−142, https://doi.org/10.1080/003932799750041687. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/003932799750041687
View in Google Scholar

Saloni Z., Świdziński M., 1998, Składnia współczesnego języka polskiego, wyd. 4 zm. i popr., Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Schmidtke-Bode K., 2009, A Typology of Purpose Clauses, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.88
View in Google Scholar

Searle J.R., 1995, Umysł, mózg i nauka, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

SJPD: W. Doroszewski (red.), Słownik języka polskiego, t. I–XI, Warszawa 1958–1969.
View in Google Scholar

Szober S., 1915, Gramatyka języka polskiego, cz. 3: Rozbiór form zdania, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Szober S., 1963, Gramatyka języka polskiego, wyd. 6, oprac. W. Doroszewski, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar

Świdziński M., 1982, Związki syntaktyczne z grupą bezokolicznikową w języku polskim, „Prace Filologiczne” XXXI, s. 231–244.
View in Google Scholar

Tagliamonte S.A., Durham M., Smith J., 2014, Grammaticalization at an Early Stage: Future be going to in Conservative British Dialects, „English Language and Linguistics” 18/1, s. 75−108, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674313000282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674313000282
View in Google Scholar

Traugott E., 1978, On the Expression of Spatio-Temporal Relations in Language, [w:] J.H. Greenberg, Ch.A. Ferguson, E.A. Moravcsik (red.), Universals of Human Language, t. 3: Word Structure, Stanford, s. 369–400.
View in Google Scholar

Traugott E., 1988, Pragmatic Strengthening and Grammaticalizaton, [w:] S. Axmaker, A. Jaisser, H. Singmaster (red.), Berkeley Linguistic Society. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting, February 13–15 1988. General Session and Parasession on Grammaticalization, Berkeley, s. 406−416, https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v14i0.1784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3765/bls.v14i0.1784
View in Google Scholar

Veland R., 2014, Adjunct/Argument Alternation Without Lexical Change. Italian ‘a + Infinitive’ Following a Verb of Motion, „Romanische Forschungen” 126, s. 153−172, https://doi.org/10.3196/003581214812516328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3196/003581214812516328
View in Google Scholar

Wekker H.C., 1976, The Expression of Future Time in Contemporary British English. An Investigation into the Syntax and Semantics of Five Verbal Constructions Expressing Futurity, Amsterdam.
View in Google Scholar

Węgrzynek K., 2006, Kilka uwag o składni czasowników zamierzonego ruchu liniowego, [w:] I. Bobrowski, K. Kowalik (red.), Od fonemu do tekstu. Prace dedykowane Profesorowi Romanowi Laskowskiemu, Kraków, s. 379–388.
View in Google Scholar

Wróbel H., 2001, Gramatyka języka polskiego. Podręcznik akademicki, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar

WSJP PAN: P. Żmigrodzki (red.), Wielki słownik języka polskiego PAN, [on-line:] www.wsjp.pl.
View in Google Scholar

Zieliński A., 2011, La perífrasis ‘vado + infinitivo’ en las lenguas románicas occidentales, „Romanica Cracoviensia” 11, s. 505−514.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2023-05-16

Issue

Section

Contemporary Polish

How to Cite

Danielewiczowa, M. and Duraj-Nowosielska, I. (2023) “Polski bezokolicznik celu przy czasownikach ruchu”, LingVaria, 18(1(35), pp. 41–61. doi:10.12797/LV.18.2023.35.03.

Similar Articles

1-10 of 110

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.