Metafory konceptualne: fenomeny umysłu czy konstrukty kognitywistyczne? Cz. I
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/LV.14.2019.28.01Keywords:
psychology of language, psycholinguistics, semantics, cognitive linguistics, conceptual metaphorAbstract
Conceptual Metaphors: Phenomena of the Mind or Cognitive Constructs? Part I
The author considers the psychological reality of models in contemporary cognitive linguistics. The initial hypothesis is that the programmatic assumption of cognitive linguistics, i.e. the fact that linguistic activity is programmed in the mind by ambivalent, monomodular conceptual categories or gestalts, is not realized in research practice: in reality we are dealing with different versions of constructivism, i.e. speculative generation of theoretical models that cannot be used to explain linguistic facts. This general assumption is verified with reference to the theory of conceptual metaphors by G. Lakoff and M. Johnson (1980). The author presents six arguments that metaphoric models economy is a substance or emotion is a hot fluid in a container do not reflect the real linguistic or mental activities of the subjects. The author refers to numerous scientific sources as well as empirical material of Slavonic languages.
Downloads
References
Apresân V.Û., Apresân Û.D., 1993, Metafora v semantičeskom predstavlenii èmocij, „Voprosy âzykoznaniâ” 3, s. 27–35.
View in Google Scholar
Bateson G., 1979, Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unity, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Bogusławski A., Wawrzyńczyk J., 1993, Polszczyzna, jaką znamy. Nowa sonda słownikowa, Warszawa.
View in Google Scholar
Cameron L., 2003, Metaphor in Educational Discourse, London.
View in Google Scholar
Croft W., 2002, The Role of Domains in the Interpretation of Metaphors and Metonymies, [w:] R. Dirven, R. Pörings (red.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast, New York, s. 161–206.
View in Google Scholar
Dobrovol’skij D., 1997, Idiome im mentalen Lexikon. Ziele und Methoden der kognitivbasierten Phraseologieforschung, Trier.
View in Google Scholar
Fabiszak M., 2007, A Conceptual Metaphor Approach to War Discourse and its Implications, Poznań.
View in Google Scholar
Flusberg S.J., Matlock T., Thibodeau P.H., 2018, War Metaphors in Public Discourse, „Metaphor & Symbol” 33, nr 1, s. 1–18, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1407992.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., 1995, Idiomaticity and Human Cognition, [w:] M. Everaert i in. (red.), Idioms. Structural and Psychological Perspectives, Hillsdale, s. 97–117.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., 2009, Why Do Some People Dislike Conceptual Metaphor Theory, „Cognitive Semiotics” 5, nr 1–2, s. 13–36, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.14.
View in Google Scholar
Gibbs R.W., Matlock T., 2001, Psycholinguistic Perspectives on Polysemy, [w:] H. Cuyckens, B. Zawada (red.), Psycholinguistic Perspectives on Polysemy, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, s. 213–240.
View in Google Scholar
Jäkel O., 2003, Metafory w abstrakcyjnych domenach dyskursu. Kognitywno-lingwistyczna analiza metaforycznych modeli aktywności umysłowej, gospodarki i nauki, tłum. M. Banaś, B. Drąg, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Kardela H., 2011, Ile jest strukturalizmu w kognitywizmie lub czy istnieją rewolucje naukowe w językoznawstwie?, „Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego” LXVII, s. 51–70.
View in Google Scholar
Kardela H., 2014, The Non-modular Nature of Cognitive Grammar, „SKASE. Journal of Theoretical Linguistics” 11, nr 1, s. 2–31.
View in Google Scholar
Keysar B., Shen Y., Glucksberg S., Horton W.S., 2000, Conventional Language: How Metaphorical Is It?, „Journal of Memory and Language” 43, nr 4, s. 576–593, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2711.
View in Google Scholar
Kibrik A.E., 1999, Tri ahillesovy pâty funkcionalizma, [w:] E.V. Rahilina, Â.G. Testelec (red.), Tipologiâ i teoriâ âzyka. Ot opisaniâ k obʺâsneniû, Moskva, s. 36–49.
View in Google Scholar
Kiklewicz A., 2007, Metafory pojęciowe jako baza nominacji idiomatycznej (na przykładzie polskich konstrukcji werbo-nominalnych), „Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego” LXIII, s. 197–216.
View in Google Scholar
Kiklewicz A., 2012, Znaczenie w języku – znaczenie w umyśle. Krytyczna analiza współczesnych teorii semantyki lingwistycznej, Olsztyn.
View in Google Scholar
Kiklewicz A., 2013, Konceptual’nye metafory, leksičeskie parametry i prototipičeskie èffekty, [w:] A. Kamalova (red.), Slovo kak fenomen kul’tury, Olsztyn, s. 115–150.
View in Google Scholar
Kohl K., 2007, Metapher, Stuttgart – Weimar.
View in Google Scholar
Kövecses Z., 2003, Metaphor and Emotion. Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling, Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
Lakoff G., 1977, Linguistic Gestalts, [w:] W.A. Beach, S.E. Fox, S. Philosoph (red.), Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, s. 236–287.
View in Google Scholar
Lakoff G., 1990, The Invariance Hypothesis: Is Abstract Reason Based on Image-schemas?, „Cognitive Linguistics” 1, nr 1, s. 39–74, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39.
View in Google Scholar
Lakoff G., Johnson M., 1980, Metaphors We Live By, Chicago.
View in Google Scholar
Leezenberg M., 2001, Contexts of Metaphor, Amsterdam.
View in Google Scholar
Leŝeva L.M., 2014, Leksičeskaâ polisemiâ v kognitivnom aspekte, Moskva.
View in Google Scholar
McGlone M.S., 1996, Conceptual Metaphors and Figurative Language Interpretation: Food for Thought?, „Journal of Memory and Language” 35, nr 4, s. 544–565, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0029.
View in Google Scholar
McGlone M.S., 2007, What is the Explanatory Value of a Conceptual Metaphor?, „Language & Communication” 27, nr 2, s. 109–126, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1016j.langcom.2006.02.016.
View in Google Scholar
Miller G.A., 1979, Images and Models, Similes and Metaphors, [w:] A. Ortony (red.), Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge, s. 202–248.
View in Google Scholar
Musolff A., 2004, Metaphor and Political Discourse. Analogical Reasoning in Debates about Europe, Basingstoke.
View in Google Scholar
Musolff A., 2006, Metaphor Scenarios in Public Discourse, „Metaphor and Symbol” 21, nr 1, s. 23–38, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms2101_2.
View in Google Scholar
Pawelec A., 2005, Znaczenie ucieleśnione. Propozycje kręgu Lakoffa, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Pawelec A., 2006a, Metafora pojęciowa a tradycja, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Pawelec A., 2006b, The Death of Metaphor, „Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cracoviensis” 123, s. 117–121.
View in Google Scholar
Piirainen E., 1998, „Bildspendbereich” – Metapher – metaphorisches Modell. Zu einem Beschreibungsansatz der Phraseologie des westmünsterländischen Dialektes, [w:] W. Eismann (red.), Europhras ’95. Europäische Phraseologie im Vergleich. Gemeinsames Erbe und kulturelle Vielfalt, Bochums, s. 679–692.
View in Google Scholar
Rakova M., 2002, The Philosophy of Embodied Realism: A High Price to Pay?, „Cognitive Linguistics” 13, nr 3, s. 215–244, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.2002.015.
View in Google Scholar
Rice S., 1996, Prepositional Prototypes, [w:] M. Pütz, R. Dirven (red.), The Construal of Space in Language and Thought, Berlin, s. 135–165.
View in Google Scholar
Ritchie D., 2003, „Argument is War” – Or is it a Game of Chess? Multiple Meanings in the Analysis of Implicit Metaphors, „Metaphor and Symbol” 18, nr 2, s. 125–146, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1802_4.
View in Google Scholar
Ross D., 1993, Metaphor, Meaning, and Cognition, New York.
View in Google Scholar
Sandra D., Rice S., 1995, Network Analyses of Prepositional Meaning: Mirroring whose Mind – the Linguist’s or the Language User’s?, „Cognitive Linguistics” 6, nr 1, s. 89–130, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.1.89.
View in Google Scholar
Szwedek A., 2011, The Ultimate Source Domain, „Review of Cognitive Linguistics” 9, nr 2, s. 341–366, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.9.2.01szw.
View in Google Scholar
Tabakowska E., 2001a, Językoznawstwo kognitywne a poetyka przekładu, tłum. A. Pokojska, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Tabakowska E. (red.), 2001b, Kognitywne podstawy języka i językoznawstwa, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Talmy L., 1977, Rubber-sheet Cognition in Language, [w:] W.A. Beach, S.E. Fox, S. Philosoph (red.), Papers from the Thirteenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, s. 612–628.
View in Google Scholar
Taylor J.R., 2007, Gramatyka kognitywna, tłum. M. Buchta, Ł. Wiraszka, red. nauk. E. Tabakowska, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Winters M., 2015, On the Origins of the Cognitive Grammar, [w:] J. Daems, E. Zenner, K. Heylen, D. Speelman, H. Cuyckens (red.), Change of Paradigms – New Paradoxes. Recontextualizing Language and Linguistics, Berlin – Boston, s. 150–167.
View in Google Scholar
Ziem A., 2008, Frames und sprachliches Wissen. Kognitive Aspekte der semantischen Kompetenz, Berlin – New York.
View in Google Scholar
Zinken J., 2003, Ideological Imagination: Intertextual and Correlational Metaphors in Political Discourse, „Discourse and Society” 14, nr 4, s. 507–523, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0957926503014004005.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Aleksander Kiklewicz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
