Od comitativu do spójnika. O pochodzeniu słowiańskiego spójnika i oraz litewskiego ir ‘i; też’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/LV.12.2017.24.10Słowa kluczowe:
etymologia, składnia historyczna, języki bałtyckie i słowiańskie, gramatykalizacja, typologiaAbstrakt
From Comitative to Conjunction. On the Origin of the Slavic Conjunction i and Lithuanian ir ‘and; also’
The paper aims to describe the origin of the Slavic conjunction i ‘and’ and its Baltic counterpart ir ‘and; also’ (Old Prussian ir ‘also’, Lithuanian ‘and; also’, Latvian ‘and; also; even’). Common Baltic ir traces back to the former *ī-r that stems from the conflation of demonstrative pronoun (instr. sg.) *h₁i-h₁ and locative postposition -r. On the basis of Baltic data we can establish the primary character of Slavic i ‘and’ which illustrates the functional change from comitative to coordinative conjunction.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Ambrazas V., 2006, Lietuvių kalbos istorinė sintaksė, Vilnius.
View in Google Scholar
Bakker E.J., 1993, Boundaries, Topics, and the Structure of Discourse. An Investigation of the Ancient Greek Particle Dé, „Studies in Language” 17, nr 2, s. 275–311, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sl.17.2.02bak.
View in Google Scholar
Benveniste E., 1960/1966, ‘Etre’ et ‘avoir’ dans leurs fonctions linguistiques, „Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris” 55, s. 113–134 [przedr.: idem, Problèmes de linguistique générale, Paris 1966, s. 187–207].
View in Google Scholar
Boryś W., 2005, Słownik etymologiczny języka polskiego, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar
Clark E.V., 1978, Locationals: Existential, Locative, and Possessive Constructions, [w:] J.H. Greenberg, Ch.A. Ferguson, E.A. Moravcsik (red.), Universals of Human Language, t. 4: Syntax, Stanford, s. 85–126.
View in Google Scholar
Diessel H., 1997, Predicative Demonstratives, [w:] Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Structure, s. 72–82, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/bls.v23i1.1282.
View in Google Scholar
Diessel H., 1999, The Morphosyntax of Demonstratives in Synchrony and Diachrony, „Linguistic Typology” 3, s. 1–49, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.1999.3.1.1.
View in Google Scholar
Dixon R.M.W., 2009, The Semantics of Clause Linking in Typological Perspective, [w:] R.M.W. Dixon, A. Aikhenvald (red.), The Semantics of Clause Linking. A Cross-Linguistic Typology, Oxford, s. 1–55.
View in Google Scholar
DP: Postilla Catholicka. Tái est: Ižguldimas Ewangeliu kiekwienos Nedelos ir szwętes per wissús metús. Per Kúnigą Mikaloiv Davkszą Kanonîką Médnikų… 1599, [w:] J. Palionis (red.), Mikalojaus Daukšos 1599 metų Postilė ir jos šaltiniai, Vilnius 2000.
View in Google Scholar
Endzelin J., 1922, Lettische Grammatik, Riga.
View in Google Scholar
Ford G.B, 1967, esti und yra in Vilentas’ Enchiridion, „Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie” 30, s. 353–357.
View in Google Scholar
Forker D., 2016, Toward a Typology for Additive Markers, „Lingua” 180, s. 69–100, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2016.03.008.
View in Google Scholar
Fraenkel E., 1962–1965, Litauisches etymologisches Wörterbuch, Heidelberg.
View in Google Scholar
Frajzyngier Z., 1996, Grammaticalization of the Complex Sentence. A Case Study in Chadic, Amsterdam – Philadelphia.
View in Google Scholar
Griffith A., 2011, The Etymology of OIr. ocus “and” and Methodology, [on-line:] https://www.univie.ac.at/indogermanistik/download/Griffith/Marburg/The%20Etymology%20of%20ocus.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Haspelmath M., 2007, Coordination, [w:] T. Shopen (red.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, t. 2: Complex Constructions, Cambridge, s. 1–51.
View in Google Scholar
Heine B., 1997, Cognitive Foundations of Grammar, Oxford.
View in Google Scholar
Klingenschmitt G., 2008, Lit. úošvis, „Baltistica” 43, nr 3, s. 405–429, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/baltistica.43.3.1392.
View in Google Scholar
König E., 1991, The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective, London – New York.
View in Google Scholar
Lehmann Ch., 1995, Thoughts on Grammaticalization, München – Newcastle.
View in Google Scholar
LKŽ: Lietuvių kalbos žodynas, Vilnius 1968–2002.
View in Google Scholar
Lyons J., 1967, A Note on Possessive, Existential, and Locative Sentences, „Foundations of Language” 3, nr 4, s. 390–396.
View in Google Scholar
Malchukov A.L., 2004, Towards a Semantic Typology of Adversative and Contrast Marking, „Journal of Semantics” 21, nr 2, s. 177–198, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/21.2.177.
View in Google Scholar
Mithun M., 1988, The Grammaticization of Coordination, [w:] J. Haiman, S.A. Thompson (red.), Clause Combining in Grammar and Discourse, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, s. 181–225.
View in Google Scholar
Nedoma R., 2011, Altisländisches Lesebuch. Ausgewählte Texte und Minimalwörterbuch des Altisländischen, Heidelberg.
View in Google Scholar
Ostrowski N., 2014, Once again on the Postponed Neuter Pronoun -ti, „Baltistica” 49, nr 2, s. 265–278, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/baltistica.49.2.2217.
View in Google Scholar
Ostrowski N., 2015, The Origin of the Lithuanian Particle jùk, [w:] A. Judžentis, S. Kessler (red.), Contributions to Syntax and Morphology. Proceedings of the 4th Greifswald University Conference on Baltic Languages, Berlin, s. 201–215.
View in Google Scholar
Ostrowski N., 2017, Non-verbal Predication in Baltic. Lithuanian yrà, [w:] M. Németh, B. Podolak, M. Urban (red.), Essays in the History of Languages and Linguistics. Dedicated to Marek Stachowski on the Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Kraków, s. 463–471.
View in Google Scholar
Ostrowski N., w druku, „Natural Coordination” and the Origin of the Lithuanian Conjunction beĩ ‘and’. Remarks to Old Prussian-Lithuanian Language Contacts.
View in Google Scholar
Owiński K., 2016, Rozwój funkcjonalny spójników „a” oraz „i” w języku czeskim do XVII wieku na tle stanu współczesnego, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, praca magisterska.
View in Google Scholar
Payne J.R., 1985, Complex Phrases and Complex Sentences, [w:] T. Shopen (red.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, t. 2: Complex Constructions, Cambridge, s. 3–41.
View in Google Scholar
Petit D., 2010, On Presentative Particles in the Baltic Languages, [w:] N. Nau, N. Ostrowski, Particles and Connectives in Baltic, Vilnius, s. 151–170.
View in Google Scholar
Rejzek J., 2001, Český etymologický slovník, Vozice.
View in Google Scholar
Schmalstieg W.R., 1995, An Introduction to Old Russian, „Journal of Indo-European Studies Monograph Series”, nr 15, Washington.
View in Google Scholar
Stang Ch.S., 1947/1970, Esti et yra dans les Punktay Sakimu de Szyrwid, „Norsk Tidskrift for Sprogvidenskap” 14, s. 87–97 [przedr.: idem, Opuscula linguistica. Ausgewählte Aufsätze und Abhandlungen, Oslo 1970, s. 172–180].
View in Google Scholar
Stang Ch.S., 1963/1970 = [Станг Х.С.], Третье лицо глагола „быть” в литовском и латышском языках, [w:] Ю. Маслов (ред.), Вопросы теории и истории языка. Сборник в честь Б.А. Ларина, Ленинград, s. 285–289 [przedr.: idem, Opuscula linguistica. Ausgewählte Aufsätze und Abhandlungen, Oslo 1970, s. 206–211].
View in Google Scholar
Stassen L., 2000, AND-Languages and WITH-Languages, „Linguistic Typology” 4, nr 1, s. 1–54, [on-line:] https://doi.org/10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.1.
View in Google Scholar
Stassen L., 2001, Noun Phrase Coordination, [w:] M. Haspelmath i in. (red.), Language Typology and Language Universals, t. 2, Berlin – New York, s. 1105–1111.
View in Google Scholar
Traugott E.C., 1985, Conditional Markers, [w:] J. Haiman (red.), Iconicity in Syntax, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, s. 289–307.
View in Google Scholar
Vasmer–Trubačev 1986 [= Фасмер], Зтимологический словарь русского языка, перевод с немецкого и дополнения члена-корреспондента АН СССР О.Н. Трубачева, т. I–II, Москва.
View in Google Scholar
Wackernagel J., 1924, Vorlesungen über Syntax mit besonderer Berücksichtigung von Griechisch, Lateinisch und Deutsch, Basel.
View in Google Scholar
Watkins C., 1967/1994, Remarks on the Genitive, [w:] To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his 70th Birthday, t. 3: 2191–2198, The Hague – Paris [przedr.: idem, Selected Writings, Language and Linguistics, red. L. Oliver, t. 1, Innsbruck 1994].
View in Google Scholar
Yong W., Jie X., 2013, A Systemic Typology of Existential and Possessive Constructions, „Functions of Language” 20, nr 1, s. 1–30, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/fol.20.1.01wan.
View in Google Scholar
Zinkevičius Z., 1980, Lietuvių kalbos istorinė gramatika, Vilnius.
View in Google Scholar
Zwart J.-W., 2005, Some Notes on Coordination in Head-Final Languages, „Linguistics in the Netherlands” 22, nr 1, s. 231–242, [on-line:] http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/avt.22.21zwa.
View in Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Prawa autorskie (c) 2017 Norbert Ostrowski
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
