Metafory konceptualne: fenomeny umysłu czy konstrukty kognitywistyczne? Cz. II
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/LV.15.2020.29.02Słowa kluczowe:
psychologia języka, psycholingwistyka, semantyka, lingwistyka kognitywna, metafora konceptualnaAbstrakt
Conceptual metaphors: phenomena of the mind or cognitive constructs? Part II
The author reviewed experimental studies of language metaphor, starting with the pioneer publication of Roman Jakobson from 1965. It has been shown that experimental studies confirm the postulates of G. Lakoff’s and M. Johnson’s cognitive theory of metaphor to varying degrees (more or less). The author also presents the results of a psycholinguistic experiment involving 280 respondents. The experiment based on the verbal-nominal constructions of the modern Polish language showed low consistency of answers, as well as the lack of arguments that the interpretation of metaphorical expressions (i.e. with the participation of polysemant) by respondents is not based on so-called conceptual metaphors.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Apresân Û.D., 1966, Idei i metody strukturnoj lingvistiki (kratkij očerk), Moskva.
Blasko D.G., Connine C., 1993, Effects of Familiarity and Aptness on Metaphor Processing, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition” 19, nr 2, s. 295–308, https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.295.
Bogusławski A., 1983, Interpretacja nieliteralna, metafora, proporcja analogiczna, [w:] M. Głowiński, A. Okopień-Sławińska (red.), Studia o metaforze II, Wrocław, s. 63–88.
Boroditsky L., Ramscar M., 2002, The Roles of Body and Mind in Abstract Thought, „Psychological Science” 13, nr 2, s. 185–189, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00434.
Casasanto D., Boroditsky L., 2008, Time in the Mind: Using Space to Think about Time, „Cognition” 106, nr 2, s. 579–593, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.03.004.
Costello F.J., 2002, Investigating Creative Language: People’s Choice of Words in the Production of Novel Noun-Noun Compounds, [w:] W.D. Gray, C.D. Schunn (red.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, s. 232–237, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315782379-77.
Drouillet L., Stefaniak N., Declercq Ch., Obert A., 2018, Role of Implicit Learning Abilities in Metaphor Understanding, „Consciousness and Cognition” 61, s. 13–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2018.03.015.
Gentner D., Bowdle B.F., 2001, Convention, Form, and Figurative Language Processing, „Metaphor & Symbol” 16, nr 3–4, s. 223–247.
Gentner D., Wolff P., 2000, Metaphor and Knowledge Change, [w:] E. Dietrich, A.B. Markman (red.), Cognitive Dynamics: Conceptual Change in Humans and Machines, Mahwah, s. 295–342.
Gibbs R.W., 1990, Psycholinguistic Studies on the Conceptual Basis of Idiomaticity, ,,Cognitive Linguistics” 1, nr 4, s. 417–451, https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.4.417.
Gibbs R.W., 1995, Idiomaticity and Human Cognition, [w:] M. Everaert, E.-J. van der Linden, A. Schenk, R. Schreuder (red.), Idioms. Structural and Psychological Perspectives, Hillsdale, s. 97–117.
Gibbs R.W., 1996, Why Many Concepts Are Metaphorical, „Cognition” 61, nr 3, s. 309–319, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00723-8.
Gibbs R.W., 1997, Taking Metaphor out of our Heads and Putting into the Cultural World, [w:] R.W. Gibbs, G.I. Steen (red.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistic. Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, July 1997, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, s. 145–166.
Gibbs R.W., 2003, Embodiment Experience and Linguistic Meaning, „Brain and Language” 84, nr 1, s. 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0093-934x(02)00517-5.
Gibbs R.W., 2009, Why Do Some People Dislike Conceptual Metaphor Theory?, „Cognitive Semiotics” 5, nr 1–2, s. 14–36, https://doi.org/10.1515/cogsem.2013.5.12.14.
Gibbs R.W., 2013, The Real Complexities of Psycholinguistic Research on Metaphor, „Language Sciences” 40, s. 45–52, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.03.001.
Gibbs R.W., Matlock T., 2001, Psycholinguistic Perspectives on Polysemy, [w:] H. Cuyckens, B. Zawada (red.), Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics. Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997, Amsterdam – Philadelphia, s. 213–240, https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.177.10gib.
Gibbs R.W., O’Brien J., 1990, Idioms and Mental Imagery: The Metaphorical Motivation for Idiomatic Meaning, „Cognition” 36, nr 1, s. 35–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(90)90053-M.
Gibbs R.W., Steen G.I. (red.), 1997, Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistic. Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, July 1997, Amsterdam – Philadelphia.
Giora R., 2003, On Our Mind. Salience, Context, and Figurative Language, Oxford.
Giora R., Fein O., 1999, On Understanding Familiar and Less-Familiar Figurative Language, „Journal of Pragmatics” 31, nr 12, s. 1601–1618, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00006-5.
Glucksberg S., 1991, Beyond Literal Meanings: The Psychology of Allusion, „Psychological Science” 2, nr 3, s. 146–152, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1991.tb00122.x.
Glucksberg S., 2003, The Psycholinguistics of Metaphor, „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 7, nr 2, s. 92–96, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00040-2.
Glucksberg S., Keysar B., 1990, Understanding Metaphorical Comparisons: Beyond Similarity, „Psychological Review” 97, nr 1, s. 3–18, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.3.
Gong S.-P., Ahrens K., 2007, Processing Conceptual Metaphors in On-Going Discourse, „Metaphor & Symbol” 22, nr 4, s. 313–330, https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480701528121.
Handl S., Schmid H.-J. (red.), 2011, Windows to the Mind. Metaphor, Metonymy and Conceptual Blending, Berlin – New York.
Jakobson R., 1989, W poszukiwaniu istoty języka. Wybór pism, t. 1, wybór, red. nauk. i wstęp M.R. Mayenowa, Warszawa.
Johnson M., 1987, The Body in the Mind. The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination and Reason, Chicago.
Juszczyk K., 2017, Mądrość metafory. Komunikacyjny model metafory kognitywnej, Poznań.
Kertész A., Rákosi C., Csatár P., 2012, Data, Problems, Heuristic and Results in Cognitive Metaphor Research, „Language Sciences” 34, nr 6, s. 715–727, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.011.
Keysar B., Bly B., 1999, Swimming against the Current: Do Idioms Reflect Conceptual Structure?, „Journal of Pragmatics” 31, nr 12, s. 1559–1578, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00004-1.
Keysar B., Shen Y., Glucksberg S., Horton W.S., 2000, Conventional Language: How Metaphorical Is It?, „Journal of Memory and Language” 43, nr 4, s. 576–593, https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2711.
Lachaud C.M., 2013, Conceptual Metaphor and Embodied Cognition: EEG Coherence Reveals Brain Activity Differences between Primary and Complex Conceptual Metaphors during Comprehension, „Cognitive Systems Research” 22–23, s. 12–26, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2012.08.003.
Leŝeva L.M., 2014, Leksičeskaâ polisemiâ v kognitivnom aspekte, Moskva.
Libben G., Gibson M., Yoon Y.B., Sandra D., 2003, Compound Fracture: The Role of Semantic Transparency and Morphological Headedness, „Brain and Language” 84, nr 1, s. 50–64, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5.
Lynott D., Keane M., 2003, The Role of Knowledge Support in Creating Noun-Noun Compounds, [w:] R. Alterman, D. Kirsh (red.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Mahwah, s. 746–751.
McGlone M.S., 1996, Conceptual Metaphors and Figurative Language Interpretation: Food for Thought?, „Journal of Memory and Language” 35, nr 4, s. 544–565, https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0029.
Murphy G.L., 1996, On Metaphoric Representations, „Cognition” 60, nr 2, s. 173–204, https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(96)00711-1.
Nayak N., Gibbs R.W., 1990, Conceptual Knowledge in the Interpretation of Idioms, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: General” 119, nr 3, s. 315–330, https:///doi.org//10.1037/0096-3445.119.3.315.
Pynte J., Besson M., Robichon F.H., Poli J., 1996, The Time-Course of Metaphor Comprehension: An Event-Related Potential Study, „Brain and Language” 55, nr 3, s. 293–316, https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0107.
Rákosi C., 2012, The Fabulous Engine: Strengths and Flaws of Psycholinguistic Experiments, „Language Sciences” 34, nr 6, s. 682–701, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.009.
Wierzbicka A., 2010, Semantyka. Jednostki elementarne i uniwersalne, tłum. A. Głaz, K. Korżyk, R. Tokarski, Lublin.
Wolff P., Gentner D., 2000, Evidence for Role-Neutral Initial Processing of Metaphors, „Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition” 26, nr 2, s. 529–541, https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.529.
