The Constitutionalization of International Law After Liberalism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.75.01

Keywords:

constitutionalization, authoritarian, international, populism, illiberal, Europe, state, liberal

Abstract

Many political changes that have taken place across the world in the last decade have been connected with the spill-over of a new narrative in the public dimension. Among other things, this narrative has emphasized returning control over the public space to the people once again, revitalization of the democratic community, restraint on an expansion of judicial power over representational politics, and in many instances, a specific national approach to the questions of governance. These trends have gained the name “illiberal democracy”, a description which Viktor Orban introduced into the language of political practice a few years later. Indeed, in many countries worldwide, from the United States of America (USA) during the presidency of Donald Trump, Central and Eastern Europe, to Turkey and Venezuela, it has been possible to observe changes which had the principal leitmotif to negate liberal democracy as the only possibility of organizing public space within the state. These trends are continuing, and there are no signs of them disappearing in the near future. The new dispensation in the USA under President Biden also does not guarantee an immediate return to the liberal internationalism of the 1990s. Political changes directed toward the constitutional space of the State have inspired researchers to consider the issues of new constitutionalism, new forms of democracy, and the rule of law beyond liberalism.
This article is an attempt to transfer these considerations to the international level. The text aims to consider whether withdrawal from the liberal doctrine could also be observed on an international level and what these facts could mean for the intellectual project of constitutionalization of international law. Building upon reflections on constitutionalism and constitutionalization of international law, this text presents what has up until now been the mainstream understanding of international law as a liberal construct. This showcases the illiberal turn observed among certain countries as exemplified by the anti-liberal and realist language of their constitutional representatives. In this respect, this analysis is a modest contribution to the so far nascent field of sociology of international law. However, the main endeavor of this article is to unchain the notions of international liberalism and constitutionalization of international law as being popularly understood as two sides of the same coin. Consequently, the idea of political constitutionalism of international law is introduced. Seeing things from this perspective, this text focuses on the material rather than formal aspects of international law's constitutionalization. Within the stream of so called thick constitutionalism, there are a few elements listed with which the discussion about international law may continue to engage, if this law is to be considered as legitimate not only formally, but also substantially.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Piotr Uhma, Pedagogical University of Cracow

Assistant Professor at the Institute of Law and Economics of the Pedagogical University of Krakow. Attorney-at-law. A graduate of the Faculty of Law and Administration of the Jagiellonian University in Krakow, where he also obtained a Doctorate in Law. Scholarship holder of the Kościuszko Foundation (University of Georgia School of Law) and DAAD (Institut für Öffentliches Recht, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt am Main). The author would like to thank Prof. Stefan Kadelbach for his consultation at an early stage in the drafting of this text.

References

Allot P., “The Emerging Universal Legal System”, International Law Forum, vol. 3, no. 1 (2001), pp. 12-17, https://doi.org/10.1163/15718040120962653.
Google Scholar

Alvarez J.E., “International Law in a Biden Administration”, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics (JILP), forthcoming, http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3739989.
Google Scholar

Besson S., “Whose Constitution(s)? International Law, Constitutionalism, and Democracy”, in J.L. Dunoff, J.P. Trachtman (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, Cambridge 2009, pp. 381-408, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511627088.014.
Google Scholar

Bianchi A., International Law Theories. An Inquiry into Different Ways of Thinking, Oxford 2016, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198725114.001.0001.
Google Scholar

Buchan R., International Law and the Construction of the Liberal Peace, Oxford–Portland, OR 2013.
Google Scholar

Burley A.-M., “Law Among Liberal States, Liberal Internationalism and the Act of State Doctrine”, Columbia Law Review, vol. 92, no. 8 (1992), pp. 1907-1996, https://doi.org/10.2307/1123016.
Google Scholar

Cała-Wacinkiewicz E., Fragmentacja prawa międzynarodowego, Warszawa 2018.
Google Scholar

Czapliński W., “Zasady ogólne prawa międzynarodowego”, in J. Symonides, D. Pyć (eds.), Wielka encyklopedia prawa, t. IV: Prawo międzynarodowe publiczne, Warszawa 2014.
Google Scholar

Domingo R., The New Global Law, Cambridge 2011.
Google Scholar

Drolet J.-F., Williams M.C., “Radical Conservatism and Global Order: International Theory and the New Right”, International Theory, vol. 10, no. 3 (2018), pp. 285-313, https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191800012X.
Google Scholar

Falk R. and Strauss A., “The Deeper Challenges of Global Terrorism. A Democratizing Response”, in D. Archibugi (ed.), Debating Cosmopolitics, London–New York 2003.
Google Scholar

Fassbender B., UN Security Council Reform and the Right of Veto: A Constitutional Perspective, Hague 1998.
Google Scholar

Fassbender B., The United Nations Charter as the Constitution of the International Community, Leiden 2009, https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004175105.i-216.
Google Scholar

Frank T., What’s the Matter with Kansas? How Conservatives Won the Heart of America, New York 2005.
Google Scholar

Habermas J., The Postnational Constellation. Political Essays, Cambridge 2001.
Google Scholar

Hirsch M., Invitation to the Sociology of International Law, Oxford 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688111.001.0001.
Google Scholar

Hirsch M. (ed.), Research Handbook on the Sociology of International Law, Cheltenham 2018.
Google Scholar

Hirschl R., “Opting Out of ‘Global Constitutionalism’”, Law and Ethics of Human Rights, vol. 12, no. 1 (2018), pp. 1-36, https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2018-0003.
Google Scholar

Jahn B., Liberal Internationalism. Theory, History, Practice, Basingstoke 2013, https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137348432.
Google Scholar

Jellinek G., Allgemeine Staatslehre, Bodenheim 1905.
Google Scholar

Joyce D., “Liberal Internationalism”, in A. Orford, F. Hoffmann and M. Clark (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Oxford 2016, pp. 471-487, https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198701958.003.0024.
Google Scholar

Kadelbach S. and Kleinlein T., “Überstaatliches Verfassungsrecht: Zur Konstitutionalisierung im Völkerrecht”, Archiv des Völkerrechts, vol. 44 (2006), pp. 235-266, https://doi.org/10.1628/000389206783402954.
Google Scholar

Kadelbach S. and Kleinlein T., “International Law – A Constitution for Mankind: An Attempt at a Re-appraisal with an Analysis of Constitutional Principles”, German Yearbook of International Law, vol. 50 (2007).
Google Scholar

Kane C., McCulloch C., “Populism and Foreign Policy: Deepening Divisions and Decreasing Efficiency”, Global Politics Review, vol. 3, no. 2 (2017), pp. 39-52.
Google Scholar

Kennedy D., “The International Style in Postwar Law and Policy”, Utah Law Review, vol. 7, no. 1 (1994), pp. 7-104, Symposium: Violence and the Outlaw.
Google Scholar

Kennedy D., The Dark Sides of Virtue. Reassessing International Humanitarianism, Princeton 2004, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400840731.
Google Scholar

Klabbers J., “Constitutionalism Lite”, International Organisation Law Review, vol. 1, no. 1 (2004), pp. 31-58, https://doi.org/10.1163/1572374043242411.
Google Scholar

Klabbers J., “Setting the Scene”, in J. Klabbers, A. Peters and G. Ulfstein (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law, Oxford 2009, pp. 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543427.001.0001.
Google Scholar

Kleinlein T., Konstitutionalisierung im Völkerrecht, Berlin 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24884-9.
Google Scholar

Koh H.H., “The Trump Administration and International Law”, Washburn Law Journal, vol. 56 (2017), pp. 413-469.
Google Scholar

Koh H.H., The Trump Administration and International Law, New York 2019.
Google Scholar

Koskenniemi M., From Apology to Utopia. The Structure of International Legal Argument, Cambridge 2005, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493713.
Google Scholar

Koskenniemi M., “Formalism, Fragmentation, Freedom: Kantian Themes in Today’s International Law”, No Foundations – Journal of Extreme Legal Positivism, vol. 4 (2007), pp. 7-28.
Google Scholar

Koskenniemi M., “The Fate of Public International Law: Between Technique and Politics”, The Modern Law Review, vol. 70, no. 1 (2007), pp. 1-30, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00624.x.
Google Scholar

Krisch N., Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law, Oxford 2010, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199228317.001.0001.
Google Scholar

Kumm M., Lang Jr. A.F., Tully J. and Wiener A., “How Large Is the World of Global Constitutionalism”, Global Constitutionalism, vol. 3, no. 1 (2014), pp. 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1017/S204538171400001X.
Google Scholar

Landheer B., On the Sociology of International Law and International Society, Hague 1966, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-0792-9.
Google Scholar

Levine A., Liberal Democracy. A Critique of Its Theory, New York 1981, https://doi.org/10.7312/levi91812.
Google Scholar

Marks S., The Riddle of All Constitutions. International Law, Democracy, and the Critique of Ideology, Oxford 2000.
Google Scholar

Mchangama J., “The Problem with Hate Speech Laws”, The Review of Faith and International Affairs, vol. 13, no. 1 (2015), pp. 75-82, https://doi.org/10.1080/15570274.2015.1005919.
Google Scholar

Moravcsik A. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics”, International Organization, vol. 51, no. 4 (1997), pp. 513-553, https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447.
Google Scholar

Mouffe Ch., On the Political, London 2005.
Google Scholar

Moyn S., “Beyond Liberal Internationalism”, Dissent, vol. 64, no. 1 (2017), pp. 116-122, https://doi.org/10.1353/dss.2017.0021.
Google Scholar

van Mulligen J.G., “Global Constitutionalism and the Objective Purport of the International Legal Order”, Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 24, no. 2 (2011), pp. 277-304, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156511000021.
Google Scholar

Paulus A.L., “The International Legal System as a Constitution”, in J.L. Dunoff and J.P. Trachtman (eds.), Ruling the World? Constitutionalism, International Law, and Global Governance, Cambridge 2009, pp. 69-109.
Google Scholar

Peters A., “Compensatory Constitutionalism: The Function and Potential of Fundamental International Norms and Structures”, Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 19, no. 3 (2006), pp. 579-610, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156506003487.
Google Scholar

Peters A., “Dual Democracy”, in J. Klabbers, A. Peters and G. Ulfstein (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law, Oxford 2009, pp. 263-352, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199543427.003.0006.
Google Scholar

Peters A., “Fragmentation and Constitutionalization”, in A. Orford, F. Hoffmann and M. Clark (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Theory of International Law, Oxford 2016, pp. 1011-1031, https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198701958.003.0049.
Google Scholar

Peters A., Armingeon K., “Introduction – Global Constitutionalism from an Interdisciplinary Perspective”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol. 16, no. 2 (2008), pp. 385-395, https://doi.org/10.2979/gls.2009.16.2.385.
Google Scholar

Posner E.A., The Perils of Global Legalism, Chicago 2009, https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226675923.001.0001.
Google Scholar

Rosenfeld M., “Is Global Constitutionalism Meaningful or Desirable?”, The European Journal of International Law, vol. 25, no. 1 (2014), pp. 177-199, https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht083.
Google Scholar

Scheuerman W.E., “Carl Schmitt’s Critique of Liberal Constitutionalism”, The Review of Politics, vol. 58, no. 2 (1996), pp. 299- 322, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034670500019392.
Google Scholar

Schmitt C., The Concept of the Political, London 2007.
Google Scholar

Schwöbel C.E.J., “Situating the Debate on Global Constitutionalism”, International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 8, no. 3 (2010), pp. 611-635, https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moq021.
Google Scholar

Schwöbel C.E.J., Global Constitutionalism in International Legal Perspective, Leiden 2011, https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004191150.i-205.
Google Scholar

Schwöbel C.E.J., “The Appeal of the Project of Global Constitutionalism to Public International Lawyers”, German Law Journal, vol. 13, no. 1 (2012), pp. 1-22, https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200020320.
Google Scholar

Simma B., “From Bilateralism to Community Interests in International Law”, Recueil des Cours de l’Academie de Droit International, vol. 250, no. 23 (1994), pp. 217-384.
Google Scholar

Singh Grewal D., “Three Theses on the Current Crisis of International Liberalism”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol. 25, no. 2, (2018), pp. 595-621, https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.25.2.0595.
Google Scholar

Slaughter A.-M., “Toward an Age of Liberal Nations”, Harvard Journal Of International Law, vol. 33 (1992), pp. 393-405.
Google Scholar

Slaughter A.-M., “International Law and International Relations Theory. A Dual Agenda”,
Google Scholar

American Journal of International Law, vol. 87, no. 2 (1993), pp. 205-239, https://doi.org/10.2307/2203817.
Google Scholar

Tomuschat C., “Obligations Arising for States Without or Against Their Will”, Recueil des Cours, vol. 241 (1993), pp. 195-374.
Google Scholar

Tully J., Strange Multiplicity. Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity, Cambridge 1995, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139170888.
Google Scholar

Tully J., “The Imperialism of Modern Constitutional Democracy”, in M. Loughlin, N. Walker (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form, Oxford 2007, pp. 315-338, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552207.003.0017.
Google Scholar

Werner W., “The Never Ending Closure: Constitutionalism and International Law”, in N. Tsagourias (ed.), Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Perspectives, Cambridge 2009, pp. 329-368.
Google Scholar

Verdross A., Die Verfassung der Völkerrechtgemeinschaft, Wien 1926.
Google Scholar

Volk Ch., “Why Global Constitutionalism Does Not Live up to Its Promises”, Goettingen Journal of International Law, vol. 4, no. 2 (2012), pp. 551-573, http://dx.doi.org/10.3249/1868-1581-4-2-volk.
Google Scholar

Zarbiyev F., “Judicial Activism in International Law – A Conceptual Framework for Analysis”, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol. 3, no. 2 (2012), pp. 47-278, https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/ids005.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2021-12-16 — Updated on 2022-03-11

Versions

How to Cite

Uhma, Piotr. (2021) 2022. “The Constitutionalization of International Law After Liberalism”. Politeja 18 (6(75):5-27. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.75.01.

Issue

Section

International Affairs