The Institutional Balance: a Janus-faced concept of EU constitutional law

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.45.07

Słowa kluczowe:

Institutional balance, European integration, representative theory, checks and balances, separation of powers theory

Abstrakt

The concept of institutional balance is an original theory associated with the development of the EU institutional structure. This article offers a critical analysis of the different uses of the concept. While doing that, the article provides representative samples of the ways in which the concept has been used in the processes of the European integration, including its practical implementation by the European Court of Justice. Our argument is that, in its current state, the concept of institutional balance serves both reactive and transformative functions within the EU law. It emphasises the necessity to periodically check and adjust the power distribution architecture in response to new challenges of the EU evolution process. Moreover, it serves as a conceptual vehicle through which different power configurations within the EU context may be both criticized and legitimized.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Biogram autora

  • Oleksandr Moskalenko - University of Turku

    Is a PhD candidate at the Faculty of Law, University of Turku, Finland. His research interests include European Union Law, EU-Ukraine realtions, European Parliament in the EU insitutional system, European Parliament’s role in EU foreign policy. He has published articles in East European Quarterly, Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy, Eastern Journal of European Studies, Studia Diplomatica – Brussels Journal of International Relations.

Bibliografia

Aleinikoff T.A., ‘Constitutional Law in the Age of Balancing’, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 96, No. 5 (1987), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/796529>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/796529
View in Google Scholar

Alexy R., Theory of Constitutional Rights, transl. by J. Rivers, Oxford 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2202/1938-2545.1042
View in Google Scholar

Christiansen Th., ‘The European Union after the Lisbon Treaty: An Elusive “Institutional Balance?”’ in A. Biondi, P. Eeckhout, S. Ripley (eds.), EU Law after Lisbon, Oxford 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644322.003.0011
View in Google Scholar

Conway G., ‘Recovering a Separation of Powers in the European Union’, European Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3 (2011), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00552.x
View in Google Scholar

Corbett R., Vigo Í.M. de, Report on the Treaty of Lisbon (European Parliament, Committee on Constitutional Affairs, A6-0013/2008), Jan. 29, 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Craig P., Búrca G. de, The Evolution of EU Law, Oxford 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Curtin D., Executive Power in the European Union. Law, Practices, and the Living Constitution, Oxford 2009 (The Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law).
View in Google Scholar

Curtin D., ‘The Constitutional Structure of the Union: A Europe of Bits and Pieces’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 1 (1993).
View in Google Scholar

Devuyst Yu., ‘The European Union’s Institutional Balance after the Treaty of Lisbon: “Community Method” and “Democratic Deficit” Reassessed’, Georgetown Journal of International Law, Vol. 39, No. 2 (2008).
View in Google Scholar

Douglas-Scott S., Constitutional Law of the European Union, Harlow 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Fritzsche A., ‘Discretion, Scope of Judicial Review and Institutional Balance in European Law’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 2 (2010).
View in Google Scholar

Georgopoulos Th., ‘The “Checks and Balances” Doctrine in Member States as a Rule of EC Law: The Cases of France and Germany’, European Law Journal, Vol. 9, No. 5 (2003), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-0386.2003.00191.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-0386.2003.00191.x
View in Google Scholar

Guillermin G., ‘Le principe de l’équilibre dans la jurisprudence de CJCE’, Journal du Droit International, Vol. 19, No. 2 (1992).
View in Google Scholar

Hamilton A., Madison J., Jay J., The Federalist Papers, New York 1961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674332133
View in Google Scholar

Hoffmann L., ‘Constitutional Expectations and the European Union: The Issue of Executive Opacity in the Union’s Continuous Constitutionalisation Process’, at <http://www.uaces.org/documents/papers/1102/hoffmann.pdf>.
View in Google Scholar

Jacqué J.-P., ‘The Principle of Institutional Balance’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 41, No. 2 (2004).
View in Google Scholar

Kreher A., ‘Agencies in the European Community: A Step towards Administrative Integration of Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 4, No. 2 (1997). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769709696340
View in Google Scholar

Lang J.T., Gallagher E., ‘The Commission, the “Community Method”, and the Smaller Member States’, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 5 (2006).
View in Google Scholar

Lenaerts K., Verhoeven A., ‘Institutional Balance as a Guarantee for Democracy in EU Governance’ in C. Joerges, R. Dehousse (eds.), Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market, Oxford 2002 (Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, 11/2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246083.003.0002
View in Google Scholar

Magnette P., ‘La grande transformation de l’Europe’ in P. Magnette, E. Remacle (eds.), Le nouveau modèle européen, Vol. 1: Institutions et gouvernance, Bruxelles 2000 (Études Européennes).
View in Google Scholar

Menon A., Weatherill S., Democratic Politics in a Globalising World. Supranationalism and Legitimacy in the European Union, London 2007 (LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, 13/2007). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1021218
View in Google Scholar

Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen delivered on 12 September 2013 (1), Case C-270/12 United Kingdom v European Parliament and Council of the European Union, at <http://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf ?docid=140965&doclang=EN>.
View in Google Scholar

Pedler R., Schaefer G. (eds.), Shaping European Law and Policy. The Role of Committees and Comitology in the Political Process, Maastricht 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Peers S., Costa M., ‘Accountability for Delegated and Implementing Acts after the Treaty of Lisbon’, European Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3 (2012), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00607.x>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2012.00607.x
View in Google Scholar

Pescatore P., ‘Les travaux du “groupe juridique” dans la négociation des traités de Rome’, Studia Diplomatica, Vol. 34, No. 168 (1981).
View in Google Scholar

Petersmann E.-U., ‘Proposals for a New Constitution for the European Union: Building Blocks for a Constitutional Theory and Constitutional Law of the EU’, Common Market Law Review, Vol. 32, No. 5 (1995).
View in Google Scholar

Prechal S., ‘Institutional Balance: A Fragile Principle with Uncertain Content’ in T. Heukels, N. Blokker, M. Brus (eds.), The European Union after Amsterdam. A Legal Analysis, The Hague 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Prodi R., ‘The State of the Union in 2001, address before the European Parliament’, Bulletin of the European Union, No. 1/2 (2001).
View in Google Scholar

Rosas A., Armati L., EU Constitutional Law. An Introduction, Oxford 2010.
View in Google Scholar

Rossi L.S., ‘A New Inter-Institutional Balance: Supranational vs. Intergovernmental Method after the Lisbon Treaty’, Global Jean Monnet-ECSA WORLD Conference “The European Union after the Treaty of Lisbon”, Brussels, 25-26 May 2010, at <http://www.astrid-online.it/static/upload/protected/Ross/Rossi-Global-Jean-Monnet-paper.pdf>.
View in Google Scholar

Sbragia A., ‘The European Community: A Balancing Act’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, Vol. 23, No. 3 (1993). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3330840
View in Google Scholar

‘Schuman Declaration and the Birth of Europe. Speech of 9 May 1950’, Schuman Project, at <http://www.schuman.info>.
View in Google Scholar

Shapiro D., Federalism. A Dialogue, Evanston 1995.
View in Google Scholar

Smismans S., ‘Institutional Balance as Interest Representation. Some Reflections on Lenaerts and Verhoeven’ in C. Joerges, R. Dehousse (eds.), Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market, Oxford 2002 (Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law, 11/2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199246083.003.0003
View in Google Scholar

Thody Ph., A Historical Introduction to the European Union, London 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Tugendhat Ch., Making Sense of Europe, London 1986.
View in Google Scholar

Verhoeven A., The European Union in Search of a Democratic and Constitutional Theory, The Hague 2002 (European Monographs, 38).
View in Google Scholar

Wallace H., ‘The Institutional Setting: Five Variations on a Theme’ in H. Wallace, W. Wallace (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, Oxford 2000 (The New European Union Series).
View in Google Scholar

Warleigh A. (ed.), Understanding European Union Institutions, London 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203470909
View in Google Scholar

Opublikowane

17-12-2016

Numer

Dział

Artykuły

Jak cytować

„The Institutional Balance: a Janus-faced concept of EU constitutional law”. 2016. Politeja 13 (45): 125-43. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.45.07.