Evaluating the Impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the European Union’s Legislative Productivity

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.15.2018.54.15

Słowa kluczowe:

Treaty of Lisbon, ordinary legislative procedure, European Union, legislative productivity, EU legislative process

Abstrakt

The purpose of this article is to analyze whether the Treaty of Lisbon provisions have – as expected – increased the EU legislative productivity. To this end, the author tests the hypothesis that the TL has increased the number of legislative proposals submitted by the European Commission under the ordinary legislative procedure. This expectation is verified using a negative binomial regression on a dataset containing 1116 draft acts proposed by the Commission in 2004‑2014. The analysis shows that, contrary to expectations, the Treaty of Lisbon has not led to a visible increase in EU legislative productivity. Despite the extension of treaty bases envisaging the OLP and QMV, the number of proposals submitted under this procedure after the entry into force of the TL remained more or less at the same level as before. In addition, the study reveals that adaptation, anticipation of future enlargement, closeness to the end of the EP term as well as annual schedule of legislative work are key predictors of the Commission’s productivity.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Biogram autora

  • Adam Kirpsza - Uniwersytet Jagielloński

    Assistant professor in the Institute of Political Science and International Relations at the Jagiellonian University. He holds PhD in Political Science, MA in International Relations and MA in Law. His research focuses on the EU lawmaking, negotiation theory, public policies as well quantitative methods.

Bibliografia

Aspinwall M.D., Schneider G., “Same Menu, Separate Tables: The Institutionalist Turn in Political
View in Google Scholar

Science and the Study of European Integration”, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 38, no. 1 (2000), at <https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007055330779>.
View in Google Scholar

Checkel J.T., “Social Construction and Integration”, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 6, no. 4 (1999), at <https://doi.org/10.1080/135017699343469>.
View in Google Scholar

European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘EU Regulatory Fitness’, Strasbourg, 12 December 2012, COM(2012) 746 final.
View in Google Scholar

European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions ‘Better regulation for better results – An EU agenda’, Strasbourg, 19 May 2015, COM(2015) 215 final.
View in Google Scholar

Farrell H., Héritier A., “Formal and Informal Institutions Under Codecision: Continuous Constitution‑Building in Europe”, Governance, vol. 16, no. 4 (2003), at <https://doi.org/10.1111/1468‑0491.00229>.
View in Google Scholar

Garrett G., Tsebelis G., “An Institutional Critique of Intergovernmentalism”, International Organization, vol. 50, no. 2 (1996), at <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028563>.
View in Google Scholar

Garrett G., Tsebelis G., “Understanding Better the EU Legislative Process”, European Union Politics, vol. 2, no. 3 (2001).
View in Google Scholar

Häge F.M., Kaeding M., “Reconsidering the European Parliament’s Legislative Influence: Formal vs. Informal Procedures”, Journal of European Integration, vol. 29, no. 3 (2007), at <https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330701442356>.
View in Google Scholar

Heisenberg D., “The Institution of ‘Consensus’ in the European Union: Formal versus Informal
View in Google Scholar

Decision‑Making in the Council”, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 44, no. 1 (2005), at <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475‑6765.2005.00219.x>.
View in Google Scholar

Hilbe J.M., Negative Binomial Regression, 2nd ed., Cambridge 2011.
View in Google Scholar

Hix S., Hagemann S., Frantescu D., Would Brexit Matter? The UK’s Voting Record in the Council
View in Google Scholar

and the European Parliament, VoteWatch Europe special report, 2016, at <http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/66261/1/Hix_Brexit%20matter_2016.pdf>.
View in Google Scholar

Kirpsza A., “Legislative Challenges for the European Union after the Treaty of Lisbon Entered into Force”, Przegląd Zachodni, no. 1, special issue (2013).
View in Google Scholar

Kirpsza A., “Skuteczność poprawek Parlamentu Europejskiego w procedurze konsultacji (specjalnej procedurze ustawodawczej)”, Politeja, no. 35 (2015), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.35.27>.
View in Google Scholar

Kirpsza A., “Warunki sukcesu poprawek Parlamentu Europejskiego w zwykłej procedurze ustawodawczej”, Przegląd Europejski, no. 40 (2016).
View in Google Scholar

Kreppel A., Oztas B., “Leading the Band or Just Playing the Tune? Reassessing the Agenda‑Setting Powers of the European Commission”, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 50, no. 8 (2017), at <https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016666839>.
View in Google Scholar

Leuffen D., Hertz R., “If Things Can Only Get Worse: Anticipation of Enlargement in the European Union”, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 49, no. 1 (2010), at <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475‑6765.2009.01887.x>.
View in Google Scholar

March J.G., Olsen J.P., “The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders”, International Organization, vol. 52, no. 4 (1998), at <https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550699>.
View in Google Scholar

Osnabrügge M., “The European Commission and the Implementation of Its Legislative Programme”, European Union Politics, vol. 16, no. 2 (2015), at <https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116515573844>.
View in Google Scholar

Pittella G., Vidal‑Quadras A., Papastamkos G., Activity report on Codecision and Conciliation, 14 July 2009 – 30 June 2014 (7th parliamentary term), European Parliament 2009‑2014, DV1031024EN.doc, Strasbourg 2014.
View in Google Scholar

Pollack M., “Rational Choice and EU Policy”, in K.E. Jørgensen, M.A. Pollack, B. Rosamond (eds.), Handbook of European Union Politics, London 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Rasmussen A., “Challenging the Commission’s Right of Initiative? Conditions for Institutional Change and Stability”, West European Politics, vol. 30, no. 2 (2007), at <https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701239707>.
View in Google Scholar

Reh C. [et al.], “The Informal Politics of Legislation: Explaining Secluded Decision Making in the European Union”, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 46, no. 9 (2013), at <https://doi.org/10.117/0010414011426415>.
View in Google Scholar

Tholoniat L., “The Temporal Constitution of the European Commission: A Timely Investigation”, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 16, no. 2 (2009), at <https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802589230>.
View in Google Scholar

Węc J.J., “Pozycja Parlamentu Europejskiego w reżimie traktatu lizbońskiego”, in A. Kirpsza, P. Musiałek, D. Stolicki (eds.), Podsumowanie siódmej kadencji Parlamentu Europejskiego (2009‑2014), Kraków 2015.
View in Google Scholar

Opublikowane

20-05-2018

Jak cytować

„Evaluating the Impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the European Union’s Legislative Productivity”. 2018. Politeja 15 (3(54): 229-41. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.15.2018.54.15.