Without Power Comes Great Irresponsibility. Conservative Euroscepticism from Opposition to Brexit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.22.2025.97.03Słowa kluczowe:
Brexit, UK, Conservative Party, responsibility, party change, EuroscepticismAbstrakt
In this article, we ask how Conservative Euroscepticism was able to transform over the years from a more-or-less reasonable critique of the terms of the Maastricht Treaty to a trenchant opposition to British association with the EU. We argue that policy radicalism is accelerated by a lack of power over policy outcomes, such that political claims (assumptions, policies) cannot be implemented and thus cannot be tested against the harsh light of reality. We argue that stints in opposition, in coalition, and in a state of severe internal division can all lessen the responsibilities of governing and thus remove the onus on political actors to own – and be held accountable for – their policies. This is reinforced by high levels of external interdependence, the instrumental use of policy pronouncements, and hand-tying strategies by governments, all of which diminish any expectation that policies will need to be delivered. Empirically we demonstrate our argument by charting the evolution of Conservative Euroscepticism from the Maastricht Treaty in 1993 to the present day, drawing on a number of elite interviews with current and former Conservative politicians.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Adler-Nissen R., Galpin C., Rosamond B., “Performing Brexit: How a Post-Brexit World Is Imagined Outside the United Kingdom,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3 (2017), pp. 573-591, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117711092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117711092
View in Google Scholar
Baker D., Gamble A., Seawright D., “Sovereign Nations and Global Markets: Modern British Conservatism and Hyperglobalism,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 4, no. 3 (2002), pp. 399-428, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.t01-1-00086. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.t01-1-00086
View in Google Scholar
Baldini G., Bressanelli E., Massetti E., “Back to the Westminster Model? The Brexit Process and the UK Political System,” International Political Science Review, vol. 43, no. 3 (2022), pp. 329-344, https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120967375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120967375
View in Google Scholar
Bale T., “Who Leads and Who Follows? The Symbiotic Relationship between UKIP and the Conservatives – and Populism and Euroscepticism,” Politics, vol. 38, no. 3 (2018), pp. 263-277, https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395718754718. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395718754718
View in Google Scholar
Bale T., Pike K., “Hopes Will Be Dashed: Brexit and the ‘Merkel Myth,’” Journal of European Integration, vol. 46, no. 2 (2024), pp. 135-153, https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2252575. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2252575
View in Google Scholar
Barnier M., My Secret Brexit Diary: A Glorious Illusion, transl. by R. Mackay, London 2019.
View in Google Scholar
Barwell G., Chief of Staff: Notes from Downing Street, London 2021.
View in Google Scholar
Beaumont P., “Brexit and EU Legitimation: Unwitting Martyr for the Cause?,” New Perspectives, vol. 27, no. 3 (2019), pp. 15-36, https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X1902700302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825X1902700302
View in Google Scholar
Béraud-Sudreau L., Pannier A., “An ‘Improbable Paris-Berlin-Commission Triangle’: Usages of Europe and the Revival of EU Defense Cooperation after 2016,” Journal of European Integration, vol. 43, no. 3 (2021), pp. 295-310, https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1740 215. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1740215
View in Google Scholar
Bickerton C.J., “The Limits of Differentiation: Capitalist Diversity and Labour Mobility as Drivers of Brexit,” Comparative European Politics, vol. 17, no. 2 (2019), pp. 231-245, https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.36656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00160-x
View in Google Scholar
Brusenbauch Meislová M., Martill B., “Getting Brexit Done? The Politics of Issue-Eclipsing Pledges,” Journal of European Public Policy (2024), pp. 1-24, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2399223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2024.2399223
View in Google Scholar
Cameron D., For the Record, London 2019.
View in Google Scholar
Cardwell P.J., “The End of Exceptionalism and a Strengthening of Coherence? Law and Legal Integration in the EU Post-Brexit,” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 57, no. 6 (2019), pp. 1407-1418, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12959. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12959
View in Google Scholar
Carter N., Jacobs M., “Explaining Radical Policy Change: The Case of Climate Change and Energy Policy under the British Labour Government 2006-10,” Public Administration, vol. 92, no. 1 (2014), pp. 125-141, https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12046
View in Google Scholar
Conservative Party, It’s Time for Action, Conservative Election Manifesto 2005, London 2005, at https://manifesto.deryn.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Conservatives-manifesto-uk-2005-1.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Conservative Party, Time for Common Sense, London 2001, at https://manifesto.deryn.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/UK-Conservatives-2001-Manifesto.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Convery A., Martill B., “Neverland: The Strange Non-Death of Cakeism in Conservative European Thought,” Journal of European Integration (2024), pp. 1-20, https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2024.2429099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2024.2429099
View in Google Scholar
De Rynck S., Inside the Deal: How the EU Got Brexit Done, London 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv34dm78b
View in Google Scholar
Duggan C., “Interfering in Brexit: Responsibility, Representation, and the ‘Meaningful Vote’ That Wasn’t,” European Journal of English Studies, vol, 25, no. 1 (2021), pp. 49-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13825577.2021.1918837
View in Google Scholar
Elliott F., Hanning J., Cameron: Practically a Conservative, London 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Ezrow L., “Research Note: On the Inverse Relationship between Votes and Proximity for Niche Parties,” European Journal of Political Research, vol. 47, no. 2 (2008), pp. 206-220, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00724.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00724.x
View in Google Scholar
Figueira F., Martill B., “Bounded Rationality and the Brexit Negotiations: Why Britain Failed to Understand the EU,” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 28, no. 12 (2021), pp. 1871-1889, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1810103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1810103
View in Google Scholar
Fontana C., Parsons C., “‘One Woman’s Prejudice’: Did Margaret Thatcher Cause Britain’s Anti-Europeanism?,” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 53, no. 1 (2025), pp. 89-105, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12205
View in Google Scholar
George S., An Awkward Partner: Britain in the European Community, Oxford 1988.
View in Google Scholar
Glencross A., “The Origins of ‘Cakeism’: The British Think Tank Debate over Repatriating Sovereignty and Its Impact on the UK’s Brexit Strategy,” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 30, no. 6 (2023), pp. 995-1012, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2072371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2072371
View in Google Scholar
Grey Ch., Brexit Unfolded: How No One Got What They Wanted (and Why They Were Never Going to), London 2021.
View in Google Scholar
Hannan D., A Doomed Marriage: Why Britain Should Leave the EU, London 2016.
View in Google Scholar
Hay C., Farrall S., “Establishing the Ontological Status of Thatcherism by Gauging Its ‘Periodisability’: Towards a ‘Cascade Theory’ of Public Policy Radicalism,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 13, no. 4 (2011), pp. 439-458, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00443.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2010.00443.x
View in Google Scholar
Hayton R., “Conservative Party Statecraft and the Politics of Coalition,” Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 67, no. 1 (2014), pp. 6-24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gst019
View in Google Scholar
Heide M., Worthy B., “Secrecy and Leadership: The Case of Theresa May’s Brexit Negotiations,” Public Integrity, vol. 21, no. 6 (2019), pp. 582-594, https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3460974. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2019.1609273
View in Google Scholar
Heinkelmann-Wild T. et al., “Divided They Fail: The Politics of Wedge Issues and Brexit,” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 27, no. 5 (2020), pp. 723-741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1683058
View in Google Scholar
Heppell T., “The Ideological Composition of the Parliamentary Conservative Party 1992-1997,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 4, no. 2 (2002), pp. 299-324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.t01-1-00006
View in Google Scholar
Hobolt S.B., “The Brexit Vote: A Divided Nation, a Divided Continent,” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 23, no. 9 (2016), pp. 1259-1277, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785
View in Google Scholar
Holden P., “Still ‘Leading from the Edge’? New Labour and the European Union,” in O. Daddow, J. Gaskarth (eds), British Foreign Policy: The New Labour Years, Basingstoke 2011, pp. 157-169, https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307315_9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230307315_9
View in Google Scholar
Huber J.D., “The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies,” American Political Science Review, vol. 90, no. 2 (1996), pp. 269-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2082884
View in Google Scholar
Ikenberry G.J., “Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order,” Perspectives on Politics, vol. 7, no. 1 (2009), pp. 71-87, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112
View in Google Scholar
King A., “Modes of Executive-Legislative Relations: Great Britain, France, and West Germany,” Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 1, no. 1 (1976), pp. 11-36, https://doi.org/10.2307/439626. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/439626
View in Google Scholar
Kroll D.A., Leuffen D., “Ties That Bind, Can Also Strangle: The Brexit Threat and the Hardships of Reforming the EU,” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 23, no. 9 (2016), pp. 1311-1320, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1174532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1174532
View in Google Scholar
Laffan B., “How the EU27 Came to Be,” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 57, no. S1 (2019), pp. 13-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12917
View in Google Scholar
Laffan B., Telle S., The EU’s Response to Brexit: United and Effective, Basingstoke 2023, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26263-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-26263-0
View in Google Scholar
Lake D.A., “Rightful Rules: Authority, Order, and the Foundations of Global Governance,” International Studies Quarterly, vol. 54, no. 3 (2010), pp. 587-613, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00601.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00601.x
View in Google Scholar
Lijphart A., “Democratic Political Systems: Types, Cases, Causes, and Consequences,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 1, no. 1 (1989), pp. 33-48, https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692889001001003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692889001001003
View in Google Scholar
Lynch Ph., Whitaker R., “Where There Is Discord, Can They Bring Harmony? Managing Intra-Party Dissent on European Integration in the Conservative Party,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 15, no. 3 (2013), pp. 317-339, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00526.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00526.x
View in Google Scholar
Martill B., “Deal or No Deal: Theresa May’s Withdrawal Agreement and the Politics of (Non-) Ratification,” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 59, no. 6 (2021), pp. 1607-1622, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13205. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13205
View in Google Scholar
Martill B., “Withdrawal Symptoms: Party Factions, Political Change and British Foreign Policy Post-Brexit,” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 30, no. 11 (2023), pp. 2468-2491, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2198578. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2198578
View in Google Scholar
McEwen N., Murphy M.C., “Brexit and the Union: Territorial Voice, Exit and Re-Entry Strategies in Scotland and Northern Ireland after EU Exit,” International Political Science Review, vol. 43, no. 3 (2022), pp. 374-389, https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512121990543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512121990543
View in Google Scholar
Menon A., Salter J.-P., “Brexit: Initial Reflections,” International Affairs, vol. 92, no. 6 (2016), pp. 1297-1318, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12745
View in Google Scholar
Oliver C., Unleashing Demons: The Inside Story of Brexit, London 2016.
View in Google Scholar
Quinn Th., Allen N., Bartle J., “Why Was There a Hard Brexit? The British Legislative Party System, Divided Majorities and the Incentives for Factionalism,” Political Studies, vol. 72, no. 1 (2024), pp. 227-248, https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221076353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217221076353
View in Google Scholar
Richardson J., Rittberger B., “Brexit: Simply an Omnishambles or a Major Policy Fiasco?,” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 27, no. 5 (2020), pp. 649-665, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1736131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1736131
View in Google Scholar
Rogers L., “Cue Brexit: Performing Global Britain at the UN Security Council,” European Journal of International Security, vol. 9, no. 1 (2024), pp. 122-140, https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2023.27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2023.27
View in Google Scholar
Rogstad A., Martill B., “How to Be Great (Britain)? Discourses of Greatness in the United Kingdom’s Referendums on Europe,” European Review of International Studies, vol. 9, no. 2 (2022), pp. 210-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/21967415-09020007
View in Google Scholar
Russell M., “Brexit and Parliament: The Anatomy of a Perfect Storm,” Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 74, no. 2 (2021), pp. 443-463, https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaa011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsaa011
View in Google Scholar
Sayers A.M., Denemark D., “Radicalism, Protest Votes and Regionalism: Reform and the Rise of the New Conservative Party,” Canadian Political Science Review, vol. 8, no. 1 (2014), pp. 3-26, https://doi.org/10.24124/c677/2014570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24124/c677/2014570
View in Google Scholar
Schnapper P., “Theresa May, the Brexit Negotiations and the Two-Level Game, 2017-2019,” Journal of Contemporary European Studies, vol. 29, no. 3 (2021), pp. 368-379, https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1753665. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1753665
View in Google Scholar
Schuette L.A., “Forging Unity: European Commission Leadership in the Brexit Negotiations,” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 59, no. 5 (2021), pp. 1142-1159, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13171. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13171
View in Google Scholar
Seldon A., May at 10, London 2019.
View in Google Scholar
Smith J., “David Cameron’s EU Renegotiation and Referendum Pledge: A Case of Déjà Vu?,” British Politics, vol. 11, no. 3 (2016), pp. 324-346, https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2016.11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2016.11
View in Google Scholar
Sobolewska M., Ford R., Brexitland: Identity, Diversity and the Reshaping of British Politics, Cambridge 2020, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108562485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108562485
View in Google Scholar
Tewes H., “Between Deepening and Widening: Role Conflict in Germany’s Enlargement Policy,” West European Politics, vol. 21, no. 2 (1998), pp. 117-133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389808425247
View in Google Scholar
Thompson H., “Inevitability and Contingency: The Political Economy of Brexit,” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3 (2017), pp. 434-449, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117710431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117710431
View in Google Scholar
Usherwood S., “‘Our European Friends and Partners’? Negotiating the Trade and Cooperation Agreement,” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 59, no. S1 (2021), pp. 115-123, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13238
View in Google Scholar
Wall S., Reluctant European: Britain and the European Union from 1945 to Brexit, Oxford 2020, https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840671.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840671.001.0001
View in Google Scholar
Wille T., Martill B., “Trust and Calculation in International Negotiations: How Trust Was Lost after Brexit,” International Affairs, vol. 99, no. 6 (2023), pp. 2405-2422, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad243. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad243
View in Google Scholar
Zagare F.C., “Rationality and Deterrence,” World Politics, vol. 42, no. 2 (1990), pp. 238-260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010465
View in Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
