Democracy tempered by Aristocracy: rethinking an old idea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.45.01Słowa kluczowe:
democracy, aristocracy, aristocratic ethos, idea of gentility, virtue theory, rulership, leadershipAbstrakt
This article retakes an argument that has ancient roots, but is nowadays largely forgotten, namely that democracy, to be viable and stable, stands in need of aristocratic checks. First of all, institutional checks, like an Upper House in Parliament, and a professional judiciary. But more importantly – and that is what the article focuses on – an aristocratic ethos in the rulership or leadership. The tradition of reflection on the aristocratic ethos, going back to antiquity, is described, including the virtue theory it propounds. Finally, an overview is given of the traditional ideas on how to create and ensure the influence of the aristocratic ethos over the rulers or leaders.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Allman D., Beatty M. (eds.), Cultivating Citizens. Soulcraft and Citizenship in Contemporary America, Lanham 2003 (Applications of Political Theory).
View in Google Scholar
Anthony D., De la République et de la citoyenneté. Le défi démocratique dans la France du XXIe siècle, Besançon 2009.
View in Google Scholar
Aristotle, De Anima.
View in Google Scholar
Aristotle, Eudemian Ethics.
View in Google Scholar
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics.
View in Google Scholar
Aron R., Les sociétés modernes, Paris 2006 (Quadrige. Grands Textes).
View in Google Scholar
Behrens C.B.A., Society, Government, and the Enlightenment. The Experiences of Eighteenth‑Century France and Prussia, New York 1985.
View in Google Scholar
Burke P., The Fortunes of the Courtier. The European Reception of Castiglione’s Cortegiano, Cambridge 1995.
View in Google Scholar
Carré J. (ed.), The Crisis of Courtesy. Studies in the Conduct-Book in Britain, 1600-1900, Leiden 1994 (Brill’s Studies in Intellectual History, 51). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004247024
View in Google Scholar
Chaussinand-Nogaret G., La noblesse au XVIIIe siècle. De la féodalité aux lumières, Paris 1976.
View in Google Scholar
Lord Chesterfield, Letters to his Son and Others, New York 1986.
View in Google Scholar
Cicero, De Finibus Bonorum et Malorum.
View in Google Scholar
Cicero, De Inventione.
View in Google Scholar
Cicero, De Natura Deorum.
View in Google Scholar
Cicero, De Officiis.
View in Google Scholar
Cicero, Stoicorum Paradoxa.
View in Google Scholar
Cicero, Tusculanae Disputationes.
View in Google Scholar
Dahl R., Democracy and its Critics, New Haven 1989.
View in Google Scholar
Dewey J., Democracy and Education. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education, New York 2016 (Text-Book Series in Education).
View in Google Scholar
Dyck A., A Commentary on Cicero, De Officiis, Ann Arbor 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.15366
View in Google Scholar
Evans R., The Coming of the Third Reich, New York 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Grafton A. et al. (eds.), The Classical Tradition, Cambridge 2010.
View in Google Scholar
Gutmann A., Democratic Education, Princeton 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400822911
View in Google Scholar
Kant I., ‘Zum ewigen Frieden’ in idem, Werke, Vol. 6, ed. W. Weischedel, Darmstadt 1998.
View in Google Scholar
Kinneging A.A.M., Aristocracy, Antiquity, and History. Classicism in Political Thought, New Brunswick, N.J. 1997.
View in Google Scholar
Kinneging A.A.M., Geography of Good and Evil. Philosophical Investigations, transl. by I. Hardy, ed. by J. Price, Wilmington 2009 (Crosscurrents).
View in Google Scholar
Lachaud F., Scordia L. (eds.), Le Prince au miroir de la littérature politique de l’Antiquité aux Lumières, Mont-Saint-Aignan 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Lijphart A., Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven 1999.
View in Google Scholar
MacKendrick P., The Philosophical Books of Cicero, Duckworth 1995.
View in Google Scholar
Meredith M., The State of Africa; a History of the Continent since Independence, London 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Mosca G., The Ruling Class, transl. by H. Kahn, ed. and rev. by A. Livingstone, New York–London 1939.
View in Google Scholar
Rawls J., A Theory of Justice, rev. ed., Cambridge 1999.
View in Google Scholar
Riklin A., Machtteilung. Geschichte der Mischverfassung, Darmstadt 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Rossetti W.M., Italian Courtesy-Books, London 1869 (Early English Text Society, 8).
View in Google Scholar
Sartori G., Homo videns. Televisione e post-pensiero, Roma 1997 (Sagittari Laterza, 107).
View in Google Scholar
Sartori G., The Theory of Democracy Revisited, Vol. 1-2, Chatham, N.J. 1987.
View in Google Scholar
Schumpeter J., Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, London–New York 1994.
View in Google Scholar
Shklar J., ‘The Liberalism of Fear’ in eadem, Political Thought and Political Thinkers, ed. S. Hoffmann, Chicago 1998.
View in Google Scholar
Singer B., Die Fürstenspiegel in Deutschland im Zeitalter des Humanismus und der Reformation.
View in Google Scholar
Bibliographische Grundlagen und ausgewählte Interpretationen. Jakob Wimpfeling, Wolfgang Seidel, Johann Sturm, Urban Rieger, München 1980 (Humanistische Bibliothek. Reihe 1. Abhandlungen, 34).
View in Google Scholar
Vile M.J.C., Politics in the USA, London–New York 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203437049
View in Google Scholar
Zielinski Th., Cicero im Wandel der Jahrhunderte, Leipzing–Berlin 1929.
View in Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
