The African contribution to the penalization of war crimes of sexual nature

Autor

  • Hubert Dudkiewicz Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.42.19

Słowa kluczowe:

war crime, sexual assault, international criminal tribunal, Rwanda, Sierra Leone

Abstrakt

Rape and other forms of sexual violence have been inseparably linked with the ongoing military conflicts. Despite the condemnation of war rape in modern times, its penalization arrived extraordinarily slowly. The last twenty years brought about a huge progress in the approach to the penalization of international crimes of sexual nature, which was developed in a hitherto unprecedented range in the jurisprudence of the international criminal tribunals, especially in Africa. The aim of this article is to present the cases of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) which had a significant influence on the penalization of war crimes of sexual nature in the Statute of the International Criminal Court and two trials of the Special Court for Sierra Leone (SCSL), concerning the penalization of forced marriage. It shows how the African juridical traditions contributed to the problem of the penalization of sexual war crimes.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Biogram autora

  • Hubert Dudkiewicz - Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland

    A graduate in International Relations and in Law from the Jagiellonian University in Kraków, PhD student at the Institute of Political Science and International Relations at the Jagiellonian University, and judicial trainee at the National School of Judiciary and Public Prosecution. In his research he focuses on legal issues of African states as well as the implementation of international law in Africa.

Bibliografia

Case ICTR‑96‑4
View in Google Scholar

– Jean Paul Akayesu:
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Akayesu, ICTR‑96‑4‑I, Amended Indictment, 6 June 1997.
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Akayesu, ICTR‑96‑4‑T, Judgment, 2 September 1998. Case ICTR‑95‑1
View in Google Scholar

– Clément Kayishema and Obed Ruzindana:
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Kayishema, ICTR‑95‑1‑I, Amended Indictment, 29 April 1996.
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Kayishema, ICTR‑95‑1‑T, Judgment, 21 May 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Case ICTR‑97‑20
View in Google Scholar

– Laurent Semanza:
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Semanza, ICTR‑97‑20‑I,
View in Google Scholar

Third Amended Indictment, 12 October 1999.
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Semanza, ICTR‑97‑20‑T,
View in Google Scholar

Judgment and Sentence, 15 May 2003.
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Semanza, ICTR‑97‑20‑T, Separate Opinion of Judge Yakov Ostrovsky Concerning Serious Violations of Article 3 Common to the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II, 15 May 2003.
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Semanza, ICTR‑97‑20‑T, Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Pavel Dolenc, 15 May 2003.
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Semanza, ICTR‑97‑20‑A, Judgement, 20 May 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Case STSL‑04‑16
View in Google Scholar

– AFRC
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Brima, Kamara & Kanu, STSL‑04‑16‑PT, Further Amended Consolidated Indictment, 18 February 2005.
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Brima, Kamara & Kanu, STSL‑04‑16‑T, Judgment, 20 June 2007.
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Brima, Kamara & Kanu, STSL‑04‑16‑T, Partly Dissenting Opinion of Justice Doherty on Count 7 (Sexual Slavery) and Count 8 (‘Forced Marriages’), 20 June 2007.
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Brima, Kamara & Kanu, STSL‑04‑16‑A, Appeal Judgment, 22 February 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Case STSL‑04‑15
View in Google Scholar

– RUF:
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Sesay, Kallon & Gbao, STSL‑04‑15‑PT, Decision on the Prosecution request for leave to amend the indictment, 6 May 2006.
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Sesay, Kallon & Gbao, STSL‑04‑15‑PT, Corrected amended consolidated indictment, 2 August 2006.
View in Google Scholar

– Prosecutor vs. Sesay, Kallon & Gbao, STSL‑04‑15‑T, Judgment, 2 March 2009.
View in Google Scholar

International Criminal Court, Elements of Crimes, U.N. Doc. PCNICC/2000/1/Add.2 (2000).
View in Google Scholar

– UN, Review of the Sexual Violence Elements of the Judgments of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and the Special Court for Sierra Leone in the Light of Security Council Resolution 1820, New York 2010.
View in Google Scholar

– UN Security Council, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Rome, 17 July 1998.
View in Google Scholar

– UN Security Council, Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, Freetown, 16 January 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Alija Fernández R.A., ‘Crímenes de derecho internacional y derechos de la mujer: de la protección del honor a la salvaguardia de la libertad’ in: J. A. Cruz Pacero, R. Vázquez (eds.), Derechos de las mujeres en el Derecho Internacional, México D.F. 2012 (Género Derecho y Justicia).
View in Google Scholar

Amann D.M., ‘Prosecutor v. Akayesu. Case ICTR‑96‑4‑T’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 93, No. 1 (1999). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2997961
View in Google Scholar

Askin K.D., ‘Gender Crimes Jurisprudence in the ICTR. Positive Developments’, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Vol. 3, No. 4 (2005), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqi061>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqi061
View in Google Scholar

Askin K.D., ‘Prosecuting Wartime Rape and Other Gender‑Related Crimes under International Law: Extraordinary Advances, Enduring Obstacles’, Berkeley Journal of International Law, Vol. 21, No. 2 (2003), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.15779/Z384D2S>.
View in Google Scholar

Askin K.D., War Crimes against Women. Prosecution in International War Crimes Tribunals, The Hague 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Cole A., ‘Prosecutor v. Gacumbitsi: The New Definition for Prosecuting Rape Under International Law’, International Criminal Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 1/2 (2008), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/156753608X265231>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156753608X265231
View in Google Scholar

Ellis M., ‘Breaking The Silence: Rape as an International Crime’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, Vol. 38, No. 2 (2006/2007).
View in Google Scholar

‘International Military Tribunal for the Far East’, International Organization, Vol. 3, No. 1 (1949). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300014399
View in Google Scholar

Matyasik M., Domagała P., Międzynarodowe trybunały karne oraz inne instrumenty sprawiedliwości tranzytywnej, Warszawa 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Oosterveld V., ‘The Gender Jurisprudence of the Special Court for Sierra Leone: Progress in the Revolutionary United Front Judgments’, Cornell International Law Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1 (2011).
View in Google Scholar

Sedgwick J.B., ‘Memory on Trial: Constructing and Contesting the Rape of Nanking at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, 1946‑1948’, Modern Asia Studies, Vol. 43, No. 5 (2009), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X08003570>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0026749X08003570
View in Google Scholar

Stasiak K., Trybunały umiędzynarodowione w systemie międzynarodowego sądownictwa karnego, Lublin 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Wood E.J., ‘Armed Groups and Sexual Violence: When Is Wartime Rape Rare?’, Politics Society, Vol. 37, No. 1 (2009), at <http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032329208329755>. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329208329755
View in Google Scholar

Wood E.J., ‘Sexual Violence during War: toward an Understanding of Variation’ in: S. Kalyvas, I. Shapiro, T. Masoud (eds.), Order, Conflict, and Violence, Cambridge 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Opublikowane

21-04-2016

Jak cytować

„The African contribution to the penalization of war crimes of sexual nature”. 2016. Politeja 13 (3 (42): 343-62. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.13.2016.42.19.