Jak badać politykę?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.11.2014.32.03Słowa kluczowe:
nauka o polityce, dyskurs metodologiczny, Flyvbjerg DebateAbstrakt
How to study politics? Contemporary methodological discourse in political science on the example of the Flyvbjerg Debate
The article is the analysis of contemporary methodological discourse in political science on the example of the Flyvbjerg Debate. The article focuses on Bent Flyvbjerg’s and David D. Laitin’s positions linking them with broader discussions in political science. Especially those concerning proper model of scientific researches. The author traces evolution of political science from the perspective of controversy between protagonists of analytical‑empirical model and their critics.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, red. D. Della Porta, M. Keating, Cambridge 2008.
View in Google Scholar
Arystoteles, Etyka nikomachejska, przeł. D. Gromska, Warszawa 2011.
View in Google Scholar
Beyme K. von, Współczesne teorie polityczne, przeł. J. Łoziński, Warszawa 2005, Humanistyka Europejska.
View in Google Scholar
Bourdieu P., Szkic teorii praktyki. Poprzedzony trzema studiami na temat etnologii Kabylów, przeł. W. Kroker, Kęty 2007, Biblioteka Klasyków Antropologii.
View in Google Scholar
Czym jest teoria w politologii?, red. Z. Blok, Warszawa 2011.
View in Google Scholar
Dahl R.A., Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City, New Haven 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Dreyfus H.L., Dreyfus S., Mind over Machine. The Power of Human Intuition and Expertise in the Era of the Computer, New York 1986.
View in Google Scholar
Dryzek J.S., Revolutions without Enemies. Key Transformations in Political Science, „American Political Science Review” 2006, Vol. 100, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055406062332.
View in Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg B., Making Social Science Matter. Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again, przeł. S. Sampson, Cambridge–New York 2001.
View in Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg B., Rationality and Power. Democracy in Practice, przeł. S. Sampson, Chicago 1998, Morality and Society.
View in Google Scholar
Flyvbjerg B., Sustaining Non‑Rationalized Practices. Body‑Mind, Power, and Situational Ethics.
View in Google Scholar
An Interview with Hubert and Stuart Dreyfus, „Praxis International” 1991, Vol. 11, nr 1.
View in Google Scholar
Foucault M., Słowa i rzeczy Archeologia nauk humanistycznych, przeł. T. Komendant, Gdańsk 2006, Klasyka Światowej Humanistyki.
View in Google Scholar
Geertz C., Interpretacja kultur. Wybrane eseje, przeł. M.M. Piechaczek, Kraków 2005, Cultura.
View in Google Scholar
Gunnell J.G., Political Theory. Tradition and Interpretation, Cambridge (Mass.) 1979.
View in Google Scholar
Habits of the Heart. Individualism and Commitment in American Life, red. R.N. Bellah, Berkeley 2008.
View in Google Scholar
Herbert Z., Wiersze wybrane, wybór i oprac. R. Krynicki, Kraków 2005, Biblioteka Poetycka Wydawnictwa a5, 44.
View in Google Scholar
Krauz‑Mozer B., Teorie polityki. Założenia metodologiczne, Warszawa 2005, Seria Politologiczna.
View in Google Scholar
Kuhn T.S., Struktura rewolucji naukowych, przeł. H. Ostromęcka, J. Nowotniak, Warszawa 2009.
View in Google Scholar
Making Political Science Matter. Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method, red. S. Schram, B. Caterino, New York 2006.
View in Google Scholar
The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, red. J.M. Box‑Steffensmeier, H.E. Brady, D. Collier, Oxford 2008, Oxford Handbooks of Political Science.
View in Google Scholar
The Oxford Handbook of Political Science, red. R.E. Goodin, Oxford 2011, Oxford Handbooks of Political Science.
View in Google Scholar
Perestroika! The Raucous Rebellion in Political Science, red. K.R. Monroe, New Haven–London 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Philosophy, Politics and Society. A Collection red. P. Laslett, Oxford 1956.
View in Google Scholar
Putnam R.D., Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy, Princeton 1992.
View in Google Scholar
Real Social Science. Applied Phronesis, red. B. Flyvbjerg, T. Landman, S. Schram, Cambridge–New York 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Rethinking Social Inquiry. Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, red. H.E. Brady, D. Collier, Lanham 2004.
View in Google Scholar
Rorty R., Filozofia a zwierciadło natury, przeł. M. Szczubiałka, Warszawa 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Strauss L., Sokratejskie pytania. Eseje wybrane, przeł. P. Maciejko, Warszawa 1998, Biblioteka Polityczna Aletheia, 7.
View in Google Scholar
Teorie i metody w naukach politycznych, red. D. Marsh, G. Stoker, przeł. J. Tegnerowicz, Kraków 2006, Politika.
View in Google Scholar
Theory and Methods in Political Science, red. D. Marsh, G. Stoker, London 2010, Political Analysis.
View in Google Scholar
Voegelin E., Nowa nauka polityki, przeł. P. Śpiewak, Warszawa 1992, Biblioteka Aletheia.
View in Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
