„Dyplomatyczna Republika Europy”?

Rozważania na temat wpływu wybranych rozwiązań lizbońskich na dyplomację UE w multilateralnym środowisku międzynarodowym

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.15.2018.54.10

Słowa kluczowe:

EU External Policy, EU diplomatic system, Lisbon Treaty

Abstrakt

‘Diplomatic Republic of Europe’? Reflections on the Impact of Selected Lisbon Solutions on EU Diplomacy in a Multilateral International Environment
The aim of the reflections in this article is to analyze the impact of selected institutional solutions adopted by the Treaty of Lisbon on the EU diplomacy in contemporary international relations. The article does not refer to all regulations that concern broadly defined EU External Policy, but those which, by the nature of their connections, content of competence and meaning, became the object of special interest of the treaty architects and whose implementation was to counteract deficits in continuity, coherence and leadership in EU External Policy in pre‑Lisbon period. This assumption determined the structure of the article in which, after a brief reflection on the EU nature in context of the nature of contemporary international relations, the deficits in the institutional order of the EU External Policy before the Lisbon Treaty were analyzed and then they were confronted with treaty reforms.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Biogram autora

  • Barbara Curyło - Uniwersytet Opolski

    adiunkt w Katedrze Stosunków Międzynarodowych, wicedyrektor Instytutu Politologii Uniwersytetu Opolskiego. Stopień doktora w zakresie nauki o polityce uzyskała na Wydziale Dziennikarstwa i Nauk Politycznych Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego w 2010 r. Autorka kilkunastu publikacji naukowych z zakresu procesów decyzyjnych w UE, negocjacji międzynarodowych oraz nowej dyplomacji. Stypendystka Central European Exchange Program for University Studies. Prowadziła badania w ramach projektów międzynarodowych, m.in. Funduszu Wyszehradzkiego oraz zagranicznych kwerend naukowych (m.in. w instytucjach UE w Brukseli, Public Diplomacy Council w Barcelonie, na Uniwersytecie Sztokholmskim).

Bibliografia

Adler‑Nissen R., Symbolic Power in European Diplomacy: The Struggle Between National Foreign Services and the EU’s External Action Service, „Review of International Studies” 2014, vol. 40, nr 4, [online] https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210513000326.
View in Google Scholar

Andrlić M., Public Diplomacy in the CEI Area: Some Reflections, [w:] Diplomatic Academy Proceedings, red. M. Andrlić, A. Gustović‑Ercegovac, Zagreb 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Basker E., EU Public Diplomacy, [w:] The Present and Future of Public Diplomacy. A European Perspective. The 2006 Madrid Conference on Public Diplomacy, red. J. Noya, Madrid 2006.
View in Google Scholar

Bátora J., The EEAS: A Vanguard in Diplomatic Organizing?, [w:] Europe in the World. Can EU Foreign Policy Make an Impact?, red. A. Hug, London 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Bickerton C.J., Towards a Social Theory of EU Foreign and Security Policy, „Journal of Common Market Studies” 2011, vol. 49, nr 1, [online] https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468‑5965.2010.02134.x.
View in Google Scholar

Carta C., The UE’s Diplomatic Machinery, [w:] Routledge Handbook on the European Union and International Relations. Performance, Policy, Power, red. K.E. Jørgensen, K.V. Laatikainen, London 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Duke S., The European External Action Service and Public Diplomacy, The Hague 2013, Discussion Papers in Diplomacy, 127.
View in Google Scholar

Duke S., Preparing for European Diplomacy?, „Journal of Common Market Studies” 2002, vol. 40, nr 5, [online] https://doi.org/10.1111/1468‑5965.00400.
View in Google Scholar

Duke S., Providing for European‑Level Diplomacy after Lisbon: The Case of the European External Action Service, „The Hague Journal of Diplomacy” 2009, vol. 4, nr 2, [online] https://doi.org/10.1163/187119109X440915.
View in Google Scholar

Fiske de Gouveia P., European Infopolitik. Developing EU Public Diplomacy Strategy, London 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Hettne B., Söderbaum F., Civilian Power or Soft Imperialism? The EU as a Global Actor and the Role of Interregionalism, „European Foreign Affairs Review” 2005, vol. 10, nr 4.
View in Google Scholar

Hill C., The Capability‑Expectations Gap, or Conceptualizing Europe’s International Role, „Journal of Common Market Studies” 1993, vol. 31, nr 3, [online] https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468‑5965.1993.tb00466.x.
View in Google Scholar

Hill C., Smith M., Vanhoonacker S., International Relations and the European Union: Themes and Issues, [w:] International Relations and the European Union, red. C. Hill, M. Smith, S. Vanhoonacker, Oxford 2017.
View in Google Scholar

Hocking B. [i in.], Futures for Diplomacy. Integrative Diplomacy in the 21st century. Report no. 1, The Hague 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Hocking B., Smith M., The Diplomatic System of the EU. Concepts and Analysis, [w:] The Diplomatic System of the European Union. Evolution, Change and Challenges, red. M. Smith, S. Keukeleire, S. Vanhoonacker, New York 2016.
View in Google Scholar

Hug A., Europe in the World: Can EU Foreign Policy Make an Impact?, [w:] Europe in the World. Can EU Foreign Policy Make an Impact?, red. A. Hug, London 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Jørgensen K.E., Rosamond B., Europe: Regional Laboratory for Global Polity, „CSGR Working Paper” 2001, nr 71/01.
View in Google Scholar

Kerikmäe T., Dimensions and Implications of Eastern Partnership Policy: Introduction, [w:] Political and Legal Perspectives of the EU Eastern Partnership Policy, red. T. Kerikmäe, A. Chochia, London 2016.
View in Google Scholar

Keukeleire S., Delreux T., The Foreign Policy of the European Union, Basingstoke 2014.
View in Google Scholar

Keukeleire S., Smith M., Vanhoonacker S., The Emerging EU System of Diplomacy: How Fit for Purpose, „Policy Paper” 2010, vol. 1.
View in Google Scholar

Latoszek E., Polityka traktatowa Wspólnot Europejskich wobec krajów trzecich, „International Journal of Management and Economics” 1997, vol. 3.
View in Google Scholar

Lehne S., EU – Actor or Toolbox? How Member States Perceive the EU’s Foreign Policy, [w:] Europe in the World. Can EU Foreign Policy Make an Impact?, red. A. Hug, London 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Michalski A., The EU as a Soft Power: The Force of Persuasion, [w:] The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations, red. J. Melissen, London 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Rasmussen S.B., Discourse Analysis of EU Public Diplomacy. Messages and Practices, The Hague 2009.
View in Google Scholar

Rasmussen S.B., EU Diplomacy after Lisbon: Institutional Innovation, Diplomatic Practices and International Strategy, „Romanian Review of Social Sciences” 2014, nr 7.
View in Google Scholar

Rotfeld A.D., Dyplomacja – między suwerennością a globalizacją, [w:] Nowe oblicza dyplomacji, red. B. Surmacz, Lublin 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Ruszkowski J., Governance i jego typy w systemie wielopoziomowym. Zamiast wstępu, [w:] Multi‑level governance w Unii Europejskiej, red. J. Ruszkowski, L. Wojnicz, Szczecin–Warszawa 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Surmacz B., Dyplomacja Unii Europejskiej, [w:] Nowe oblicza dyplomacji, red. B. Surmacz, Lublin 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Vanhoonacker S., Pomorska K., EU Diplomacy: The Legacy of the Ashton Era, [w:] The Diplomatic System of the European Union. Evolution, Change and Challenges, red. M. Smith, S. Keukeleire, S. Vanhoonacker, New York 2016.
View in Google Scholar

Wersja skonsolidowana Traktatu o Unii Europejskiej i Traktatu o funkcjonowaniu Unii Europejskiej, Dz.U. UE C, 2016, nr 202, [online] http://oide.sejm.gov.pl/oide/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=14803&Itemid=945.
View in Google Scholar

Zielonka J., Plurilateral Governance in the Enlarged European Union, „Journal of Common Market Studies” 2007, vol. 45, nr 1, [online] https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468‑5965.2007.00708.x.
View in Google Scholar

Opublikowane

20-05-2018

Jak cytować

„«Dyplomatyczna Republika Europy»? Rozważania na temat wpływu wybranych rozwiązań lizbońskich na dyplomację UE w multilateralnym środowisku międzynarodowym”. 2018. Politeja 15 (3(54): 147-61. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.15.2018.54.10.