The economic transformation in Hungary – detour or impasse?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.11.2014.28.05Słowa kluczowe:
economy, transformation, reforms, convergencyAbstrakt
The economic transition took place in the Central and Eastern European region almost at the same time. The reasons and the process of economic transition are similar. However, the Hungarian case had a special importance in the change of the regime, as it was followed by a political transformation. The New Economic Mechanism from 1968 brought irreversible changes in macroeconomy and in the attitude towards enterpreneurship. The reforms were stopped because of several reasons. However, the spirit survived. While focusing on the transformation, it is also essential to examine the historical and political background of Hungary to answer the question whether the socialist economy can be can be considered a “detour” or “impasse”. Using the different statistical data about the Hungarian convergency towards the developed Western European region, it can be said that the relative backwardness is rooted in the historical past and apart from the fact that several efforts were carried out in order to reduce or at least to stop the growing differences, these attempts failed partly because of several inappropriate political decisions.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Ash T. G., The Magic Lantern. The Revolution of ‘89 witnessed in Warsaw, Budapest, Berlin, and Prague, New York 1990.
View in Google Scholar
Berend I., Central and Eastern Europe, 1944‑1993.
View in Google Scholar
Detour from the Periphery to the Periphery, New York 1998, Cambridge Studies in Modern Economic History, 1. Berend I., The Economic History of Twentieth‑Century
View in Google Scholar
Europe. Economic Regimes from Laissez‑faire to Globalization, New York 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Csaba L., ‘Hadigazdaságtól a piacgazdaságig, 1945‑1990’, Rubicon, No. 3 (2001).
View in Google Scholar
Csaba L., ‘A rendszerváltás húsz éve’, Figyelő, No. 51‑52 (2009).
View in Google Scholar
Csaba L., ‘A velünk élő Kádár’, Figyelő, No. (2007).
View in Google Scholar
Gál Z. Rácz Sz., eds., Socio‑Economic Analysis of the Carpathian Area, Pécs 2008, Discussion Papers Centre for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
View in Google Scholar
Góralczyk B., Magyar törésvonalak, Budapest 2002, Universitas.
View in Google Scholar
Honvári J., ‘Az új gazdasági mechanizmus’, Rubicon, No. 2‑3 (2008), pp. 44‑58.
View in Google Scholar
Jacobs F., Where is Europe?, Opiniator, at <http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/09/where‑is‑europe/>.
View in Google Scholar
Janos A. C., Haladás, hanyatlás, hegemónia kelet‑Közép‑Európában,
View in Google Scholar
Budapest 2004, Universitas.
View in Google Scholar
Kornai J., ‘Közép‑Kelet‑Európa nagy átalakulása – siker és csalódás’, Közgazdasági Szemle, Vol. 52, No. 12 (2005).
View in Google Scholar
Körösényi A., A magyar politikai rendszer Budapest, Budapest 2004, Osiris Kiadó.
View in Google Scholar
Körösényi A., Government and Politics in Hungary, Budapet 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9786155211379
View in Google Scholar
Lengyel L., Surányi G. Határátkelés. Beszélgetőkönyv, Pozsony 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Myant M., Drahokoupil J., Transition Economies. Political Economy in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia, Hoboken 2011.
View in Google Scholar
Romsics I., ‘A Kádár‑rendszer legitimitásvesztése az 1980‑as években’. Rubicon, No. 7‑8 (2009).
View in Google Scholar
Romsics I., ‘Félperifériától a félperifériáig, a magyar gazdaság 20. századi teljesítménye’, Rubicon, No. 2‑3 (2008).
View in Google Scholar
Romsics I., Magyarország története a XX. században, Budapest 2001, Osiris Tankönyvek.
View in Google Scholar
Samary C., ‘East Europe Faced with the Crises of the System’.
View in Google Scholar
Schmidt A., ‘The Consequence of the EU Enlargement – the New Borders of the European Union’, in Challenges for the European Union in the Next Decade. A View from the Danube Region, ed. by I. Tarrósy, S. Milford, Pécs 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Schmidt A., Törésvonalak és területfejlesztés Lengyelországban; adottságok, szereplők, intézmények, perspektívák, Doctoral thesis, Pécs 2010.
View in Google Scholar
The Stalin Doctrine, Grand Strategy: The View from Oregon, 22 January 2011, at .
View in Google Scholar
Szelényi I., ‘Kapitalizmusok szocializmusok után’, Egyenlítő, No. 4 (2004).
View in Google Scholar
Szűcs J., ‘Vázlat Európa három történeti régiójáról’, Történelmi Szemle, No. 3 (1981).
View in Google Scholar
Taranto J., ‘Leonid Brezhnev Lives’, The Wall Street Journal (30 March 2012), at <http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303404704577313750705052134.html>.
View in Google Scholar
Vígvári A., ‘Reform és rendszerváltás Magyarországon’, Rubicon, No. 2‑3 (2008).
View in Google Scholar
Wallerstein I., A modern világgazdasági rendszer kialakulása. A tőkés mezőgazdaság és az európai világgazdaság eredete a XVI. században, Budapest 1983.
View in Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja
Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
