Universal Human Rights? Historical and Contemporary Comments

Autor

  • Bogdan Szlachta Jagiellonian Univeristy in Kraków

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.71.01

Słowa kluczowe:

natural law, law of nature, natural rights, human rights

Abstrakt

The concept of human rights, supposedly of universal importance, is usually derived from the tradition referred to as “Western”. Although the “classic approaches” – Greek, Roman and Christian, refer to the norms of natural law, making them the basis or limits of the rights of individuals, in modern approaches the relation is reserved, in the manner that rights become primary to norms. Although liberals of the 17th and 18th centuries consider the law of nature as a tool for their protection, starting from the 19th century, the rights (already called human rights) have been increasingly perceived as positive abilities to articulate own, subjective preferences of individuals. This evolution needs to be accounted for in the studies carried out by representatives of various cultures, since the comprehension of an individual (and even a “human person”) as an essentially culturally unconditioned one, is its ineradicable element.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Biogram autora

  • Bogdan Szlachta - Jagiellonian Univeristy in Kraków

    Full Professor of Humanities, lawyer and philosopher. Head of Chair of Political Philosophy at the Jagiellonian University in Krakow and Chair of Theory and Philosophy of Politics at the Academy Ignatianum in Krakow. Dean of the Faculty of International and Political Studies of the Jagiellonian University (2008-2016). Editor-in-chief of the serial publication “Societas” and academic journals: “Politeja. The Journal of the Faculty of International and Political Studies JU” and “Myśl Polityczna. Political Thought”. Member of Academia Europaea in London.

Bibliografia

Bryk A., Konstytucjonalizm. Od starożytnego Izraela do liberalnego konstytucjonalizmu amerykańskiego, Kraków 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Copleston F., A History of Philosophy. Ockham to Suárez, vol. 3, Mahwah, N.J.–Tunbridge Wells 1953.
View in Google Scholar

D’Entrèves A.P., Natural Law. An Introduction to Legal Philosophy, London 1957.
View in Google Scholar

Figgis J.N., Studies of Political Thought from Gerson to Grotius. 1414-1625, Cambridge 1931.
View in Google Scholar

Gilson É., Duch filozofii średniowiecznej, transl. by J. Rybałt, Warszawa 1958.
View in Google Scholar

Grotius H., O prawie wojny i pokoju. Trzy księgi, w których znajdują wyjaśnienie prawo natury i prawo narodów, a także główne zasady prawa publicznego, vol. 1, transl. by R. Bierzanek, Warszawa 1957.
View in Google Scholar

Höffe O., Immanuel Kant, transl. by A.M. Kaniowski, Warszawa 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Jones J.W., Historical Introduction to the Theory of Law, Oxford 1940.
View in Google Scholar

Levy E., “Natural Law in Roman Thought”, Studia et Documenta Historiae et Iuris, vol. 15 (1949), pp. 1-23.
View in Google Scholar

Monahan A.P., From Personal Duties towards Personal Rights. Late Medieval and Early Modern Political Thought, 1300-1600, Montreal–Kingston 1994.
View in Google Scholar

McGrade A.S., “Ockham and the Birth of Individual Rights”, in B. Tierney, P. Linehan (eds.) Authority and Power. Studies on Medieval Law and Government Presented to Walter Ullmann on his Seventieth Birthday, Cambridge 1980.
View in Google Scholar

McGrade A.S., The Political Thought of William of Ockham. Personal and Institutional Principles, Cambridge 1974, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511561238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511561238
View in Google Scholar

Monteskiusz, O duchu praw, transl. by T. Boy-Żeleński, Kraków 2016.
View in Google Scholar

Oakley F., “Medieval Theories of Natural Law. William of Ockham and the Significance of the Voluntarist Tradition”, Natural Law Forum, vol. 6 (1961), pp. 65-83, https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/6.1.65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajj/6.1.65
View in Google Scholar

Oakley F., The Political Thought of Pierre d’Ailly. The Voluntarist Tradition, New Haven 1964.
View in Google Scholar

Paulus VI, Gaudium et spes, Romae 1965.
View in Google Scholar

Pinckaers S.T., Źródła moralności chrześcijańskiej. Jej metoda, treść, historia, transl. by A. Kuryś, Poznań 1994.
View in Google Scholar

Rand A., Cnota egoizmu. Nowa koncepcja egoizmu, transl. by J. Łoziński, Poznań 2015.
View in Google Scholar

Randi E., “A Scotist Way of Distinguishing between God’s Absolute and Ordained Powers”, in A. Hudson, M. Wilks (eds.), From Ockham to Wyclif, Oxford–New York 1987, pp. 43-50, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143045900000806.
View in Google Scholar

Rawls J., A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA 1971.
View in Google Scholar

Rawls J., Political Liberalism, New York 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Rommen H., Die ewige Wiederkehr des Naturrechts, München 1947.
View in Google Scholar

Szlachta B., “Aksjologia Konstytucji RP z 1997 roku. Perspektywa badacza myśli politycznej”, Przegląd Sejmowy, vol. 25, no. 6 (143) (2017), pp. 125-150.
View in Google Scholar

Tierney B., Religion, Law, and the Growth of Constitutional Thought. 1150-1650, Cambridge 1982, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558627
View in Google Scholar

Tomasz z Akwinu, Suma teologiczna, vol. 13, transl. by P. Bełch OP, Londyn 1986.
View in Google Scholar

Tuck R., Natural Rights Theories. Their Origin and Development, Cambridge 1979, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163569
View in Google Scholar

Villey M., “La genèse du droit subjectif chez Guillaume d’Occam”, Archives de Philosophie du Droit, vol. 9 (1964), pp. 97-127.
View in Google Scholar

Opublikowane

05-04-2021

Jak cytować

„Universal Human Rights? Historical and Contemporary Comments”. 2021. Politeja 18 (2(71): 3-17. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.71.01.