Power of the Demos or Power over the Demos – Condition, Consolidation, Leadership and Threats of Modern Democracy in Political Science Discourse

Autor

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.102.01

Słowa kluczowe:

democracy, populism, control of power, political system

Abstrakt

This publication attempts to analyze the condition of contemporary democracy and the processes of its consolidation from the perspective of political science. The key issue is the question of whether modern democratic systems truly uphold the principle of rule by the people (the power of the demos), or whether they are increasingly transforming into systems in which real power is drifting away from the citizens (power over the demos). During the research, a detailed analysis of political and social discourse was conducted, with particular attention paid to the evolution of the language of public debate, the semantic shifts of concepts fundamental to democracy (e.g., freedom, representation, sovereignty, consensus), and the ways in which these concepts are employed by various political and media actors. The study identifies patterns and differences that occur in various social contexts, allowing for the formulation of conclusions relevant to shaping a more conscious, responsible, and inclusive public debate. Attention is also given to the growing phenomena of polarization, populism, the erosion of trust in institutions, and the media-driven fragmentation of the public discourse space. The work concludes with a reflection on possible directions for strengthening democratic legitimacy through civic education, transparent communication, and the accountability of political and media elites.

Pobrania

Statystyki pobrań niedostępne.

Biogramy autorów

  • Alessandro Campi - University of Perugia

    A full professor of History of Political Thought at the University of Perugia. He is the director of the Istituto per la storia del Risorgimento italiano. Since 2010, he has edited the quarterly magazine Rivista di Politica. A columnist for Il Messaggero and Il Mattino, he frequently comments on Italian and international politics. His recent books include Trasformazioni della politica (Rubbettino, 2022), Il fantasma della nazione (Marsilio, 2023), Machiavelliana (Rubbettino, 2024), and Un’esecuzione memorabile. Giovanni Gentile, il fascismo e la memoria della guerra civile (Le Lettere, 2025).

  • Małgorzata Kiwior-Filo - Uniwersytet Jagielloński

    Professor at the Jagiellonian University (UJ), is a political scientist, academic, and Vice-Director of the Institute of Political Science and International Relations at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków. Her research focuses on contemporary political thought, particularly Italian, and on undemocratic systems of power. Her research interests also include social issues, state security, and the contemporary challenges and threats to democratic systems. She is the author of scientific publications on contemporary political doctrines and a co-editor of several political science monographs.

  • Mateusz Mach - Uniwersytet Jagielloński

    Political scientist with an academic and research background, gained through experience as a research assistant during both undergraduate and graduate studies, as well as through active involvement in the leadership of student organizations. Specializes in political consulting and policy analysis, combining theoretical knowledge with practical application, which translates into extensive experience working with non-governmental organizations. His academic interests include 20thand 21st-century history, as well as international relations in Central and Eastern Europe and Central and Eastern Asia. He pays particular attention to issues concerning national and ethnic minorities, as well as topics related to propaganda and political communication.

Bibliografia

Bar-Tal D., Magal T., “Socio-Psychological Analysis of the Deterioration of Democracy and the Rise of Authoritarianism. The Role of Needs, Values and Context,” in J.P. Forgas, W.D.
View in Google Scholar

Crano, K. Fiedler (eds), The Psychology of Populism. The Tribal Challenge to Liberal Democracy, New York 2021, pp. 42-61.
View in Google Scholar

Bartlett J., Ludzie przeciw technologii. Jak Internet zabija demokrację (i jak możemy ją ocalić), trans. K. Umiński, Katowice 2019.
View in Google Scholar

Batko-Tołuć K., “Nie daj sobie wcisnąć ‘referendum’,” Sieć obywatelska Watchdog, 9 October 2023, at https://siecobywatelska.pl/nie-daj-sobie-wcisnac-referendum/.
View in Google Scholar

Buchner W., “Demokratyczna dewaluacja polityczności,” Horyzonty Polityki, vol. 2, no. 2 (2011), pp. 67-87, https://horyzontypolityki.ignatianum.edu.pl/HP/article/view/144.
View in Google Scholar

Bugaric B., “Could Populism Be Good for Constitutional Democracy?,” Annual Review of Law and Social Science, vol. 15 (2019), pp. 41-58, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042927
View in Google Scholar

Burton M., Gunther R., Higley J., “Elity a rozwój demokracji,” in J. Szczupaczyński (selected and ed.), Władza i społeczeństwo. Antologia tekstów z zakresu socjologii polityki, Warszawa 1995, pp. 42-45.
View in Google Scholar

Campi A., Transformazioni della politica, Soveria Mannelli 2024.
View in Google Scholar

CBOS, “Ekspozycja polityków i poglądów politycznych w stacjach telewizyjnych,” CBOS Flash, no. 2 (2023), at https://www.cbos.pl/PL/publikacje/flashe/pliki/2023/fl_002_2023.pdf.
View in Google Scholar

CBOS, “Ocena prawidłowości przebiegu wyborów oraz funkcjonowania demokratycznych mechanizmów i procedur wyborczych,” Komunikat z badań, no. 146 (2023), at https://www.cbos.pl/PL/publikacje/raporty/open_file.php?id=6709.
View in Google Scholar

CBOS, “Ocena Sejmu IX kadencji i oczekiwania wobec nowego,” Komunikat z badań, no. 138 (2023), at https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2023/K_138_23.PDF.
View in Google Scholar

CBOS, “Rozmowy o polityce i podziały polityczne w najbliższym otoczeniu,” Komunikat z badań, no. 85 (2023), at https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2023/K_085_23.PDF.
View in Google Scholar

CBOS, “Spadek poczucia podmiotowości obywatelskiej,” Komunikat z badań, no. 39 (2022), at https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2022/K_039_22.PDF.
View in Google Scholar

Danek A., “Czy suweren prowadzi politykę? Przywództwo państwowe wobec suwerenności,” Horyzonty Polityki, vol. 7, no. 18 (2016), pp. 107-123, https://horyzontypolityki.ignatianum.edu.pl/HP/article/view/764.
View in Google Scholar

Di Gregorio L., Demopathy and the Democratic Malaise. Symptoms, Diagnosis and Therapy, London 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781800881518.00007
View in Google Scholar

Halmai G., “Populism, Authoritarianism and Constitutionalism,” German Law Journal, vol. 20, no. 3 (2019), pp. 296-313, https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.23
View in Google Scholar

Harari Y.N., 21 lekcji na XXI wiek, trans. M. Romanek, Kraków 2018.
View in Google Scholar

Heywood A., Ideologie polityczne. Wprowadzenie, ed. T. Żyro, trans. M. Habura, N. Orłowska, D. Stasiak, Warszawa 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Kiwior-Filo M., “‘Brak’ państwa czy jego ‘nadmiar’ – wyzwania i zagrożenia współczesnej demokracji,” Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia Politologica, vol. 21, no. 282 (2018), pp. 19-33, https://doi.org/10.24917/20813333.21.2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24917/20813333.21.2
View in Google Scholar

Kłosińska K., Rusinek M., Dobra zmiana, czyli jak się rządzi światem za pomocą słów, Kraków 2019.
View in Google Scholar

“Kobiety na równość muszą czekać 107 lat. Dzięki naszej akcji wie o tym już 19 milionów Polaków,” Forbes, at https://www.forbes.pl/forbeswomen/nie-czekam-107-lat-dzieki-akcji-forbeswomen-i-ofeminin-wie-tym-juz-19-milionow/nqg.
View in Google Scholar

Kurkowski K., “Realizacja zasad wyborczych podczas wyborów parlamentarnych i referendum ogólnokrajowego w Polsce z 15 października 2023 r.,” Kortowski Przegląd Prawniczy, no. 1 (2024), pp. 53-64, https://doi.org/10.31648/kpp.9760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31648/kpp.9760
View in Google Scholar

Lakomy M., Demokracja 2.0. Interakcja polityczna w nowych mediach, Kraków 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Majchrzak A., Szymkiewicz A., “Deepfake (nie)doskonały. Czy AI tworzy realistyczne obrazy,” Demagog, 25 May 2023, at https://demagog.org.pl/analizy_i_raporty/deepfakeniedoskonaly-czy-ai-tworzy-realistyczne-obrazy.
View in Google Scholar

Manin B., Zasady rządów przedstawicielskich, Warszawa 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Markowski M. P., Wojny nowoczesnych plemion. Spór o rzeczywistość w epoce populizmu, Kraków 2019.
View in Google Scholar

Matyja M., Trudnowski P., Synowiec T., Zygmunt R., Demokracja bezpośrednia. Wizja-propozycjedoświadczenia-badania, Lewin Brzeski 2024.
View in Google Scholar

Mudde C., Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe, Cambridge 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492037
View in Google Scholar

Musiał-Karg M., Bértoa F.C., “Polskie wybory parlamentarne i referendum z 15 października 2023 roku. Wokół najważniejszych wątpliwości i zastrzeżeń co do łączenia obu głosowań powszechnych,” Politeja, vol. 21, no. 1 (88/2) (2024), pp. 41-59, https://doi.org/10.12797/ Politeja.20.2024.88.2.03. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.20.2024.88.2.03
View in Google Scholar

Nowak L., “Demokracja i mizantropia. Przemiany wyobrażeń na temat ludu a problem intelektualnego uprawomocnienia demokracji,” Horyzonty Polityki, vol. 11, no. 34 (2020), pp. 13-26, https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.1870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.1870
View in Google Scholar

Ortega y Gasset J, Bunt mas, trans. P. Niklewicz, Zakrzewo 2016.
View in Google Scholar

Pappas T., “Populists in Power,” Journal of Democracy, vol. 30, no. 2 (2019), pp. 70-84, https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0026
View in Google Scholar

Perloff R.M., The Dynamics of Political Communication. Media and Politics in a Digital Age, London–New York 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429298851
View in Google Scholar

Referendum i wybory z 2023 r. w Polsce. Problemy prawne i kontekst polityczny, w: Opinie i komentarze FRDL, Opinia nr. 20/2023, Centrum Ekspertyzy Lokalnej, Fundacja Rozwoju Demokracji Lokalnej im. Jerzego Regulskiego, 10.XIII.2025.
View in Google Scholar

Sartori G., Homo videns. Telewizja i postmyślenie, trans. J. Uszyński, Warszawa 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Schmitter P., “Demokracja – zagrożenia i problemy,” in P. Śpiewak (selected and introd.), Przyszłość demokracji, Warszawa 2005, pp. 13-37.
View in Google Scholar

Simon Y.R., Filozofia rządu demokratycznego, trans. R. Legutko, Kraków 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Stachurski M., “Niesprawiedliwość w relacji obywatel-państwo jako przykład sytuacji granicznej.
View in Google Scholar

Refleksja prawno-etyczna,” in D. Kobylański (ed.), Człowiek w sytuacji granicznej. Wybrane zagadnienia, Łódź 2023, pp. 231-245.
View in Google Scholar

Sweetman B., The Crisis of Democratic Pluralism. The Loss of Confidence in Reason and the Clash of Worldviews, London 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78382-2
View in Google Scholar

Szlachta B., Demokracja liberalna. Źródła, ustanowienie(?) i kres(?), Warszawa 2022.
View in Google Scholar

Taras D., Davis R. (eds), Power Shift? Political Leadership and Social Media, London–New York 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429466007
View in Google Scholar

Ustawa z dnia 14 marca 2003 r. o referendum ogólnokrajowym (Dz.U. z 2003 r. Nr 57, poz. 507 z późn. zm.).
View in Google Scholar

Viviani L., Leadership and Democracy. A Political Sociology of the Personalisation of Leadership, London 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77163-7
View in Google Scholar

Walker Ch., Diamond L., Platt M.F. (eds), Authoritairianism Goes Global. The Challange to Democracy, Baltimore 2016.
View in Google Scholar

Weber M., Politik als Beruf, Berlin 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-07724-3
View in Google Scholar

Wildhorn F., Murphy J., “Rudolf – Affaire Mayerling,” song “Die Fäden in der Hand,” dir. D. Leveaux, Vereinigte Bühnen Wien, at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrOCMODjTJ0).
View in Google Scholar

Opublikowane

29-05-2026

Jak cytować

„Power of the Demos or Power over the Demos – Condition, Consolidation, Leadership and Threats of Modern Democracy in Political Science Discourse”. 2026. Politeja 23 (2(102): 9-31. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.102.01.