Democracy as Telecracy?
Bernard Stiegler on the Erosion of Democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.102.13Słowa kluczowe:
democracy, telecracy, Bernard Stiegler, citizen, consumerAbstrakt
This paper examines Bernard Stiegler’s concept of telecracy as a structural threat to democracy, analyzing its epistemological, political, and ontological consequences. Stiegler argues that modern democracies are increasingly dominated by media and algorithmic perception management, transforming active citizens into passive consumers. Drawing on classical political thought – from Plato’s critique of democracy’s susceptibility to demagoguery to Aristotle’s emphasis on civic virtue – the study highlights how contemporary information systems undermine deliberation and participatory governance. The shift from citizen to consumer, driven by drive-based capitalism and psychopower, erodes democratic engagement, reducing politics to a market-driven spectacle rather than a space for rational discourse. The paper further explores how noetic entropy, the decline of critical thinking, results in a political landscape shaped by algorithmic control rather than informed decision-making. Ultimately, it argues that democracy’s survival depends on reclaiming the public sphere from media-driven manipulation through an ‘ecology of attention’ – restructuring digital and educational institutions to promote reflective political engagement. Without such reforms, democracy risks degenerating into a technocratic system where sovereignty is nominal and political agency is merely a symbolic gesture. The study contributes to political philosophy and media theory by critically evaluating the contemporary transformation of democratic subjectivity under telecratic conditions.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Aristotle, The Athenian Constitution, Public Domain Books, 2009.
View in Google Scholar
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. R.C. Bartlett, S.D. Collins, Chicago 2011.
View in Google Scholar
Aristotle, Politics, ed. by M. Deslauriers, P. Destrée, Cambridge 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Baranzoni S., “After Politics: Governing through Affect,” Deleuze and Guattari Studies, vol. 18, no. 1 (2024), pp. 120-142, https://doi.org/10.3366/dlgs.2024.0545.
View in Google Scholar
Baudrillard J., The Consumer Society. Myth & Structures, London–Thousand Oakes–New Delhi 1998.
View in Google Scholar
Bauman Z., Consuming Life, Cambridge 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Bauman Z., Globalization. The Human Consequences, Cambridge 1998.
View in Google Scholar
Bevir M., Rhodes R.A., “Interpretive Theory,” in D. Marsh, G. Stoker (eds), Theory and Methods in Political Science, Houndmills 2002.
View in Google Scholar
Chambers S., “Deliberative Democracy and the Digital Public Sphere: Asymmetrical Fragmentation as a Threat to Democracy,” Constellations, vol. 30, no. 1 (2023), pp. 61-68, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12662.
View in Google Scholar
Dahlberg L., “The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring the Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere,” Information, Communication & Society, vol. 4, no. 4 (2001), pp. 615-633, https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180110097030.
View in Google Scholar
Dahlberg L., “Rethinking the Fragmentation of the Cyberpublic: From Consensus to Contestation,” New Media & Society, vol. 9, no. 5 (2007), pp. 827-847, https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807081228.
View in Google Scholar
Deleuze G., Guattari F., Anti-Oedipus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis 1983.
View in Google Scholar
Deleuze G., Guattari F., A Thousand Plateaus. Capitalism and Schizophrenia, Minneapolis 1987.
View in Google Scholar
Filipowicz S., “Idola Theatri. Interpretacja i zagadnienie realizmu,” Teoria Polityki, no. 3 (2019), pp. 103-121, https://doi.org/10.4467/25440845TP.19.005.10288.
View in Google Scholar
Filipowicz S., “O fundamentalnej roli interpretacji,” Politeja, vol. 12, no. 4 (36) (2015), pp. 191-204, https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.36.12.
View in Google Scholar
Gadamer H.G., Truth and Method, London 2004.
View in Google Scholar
Habermas J., A New Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere and Deliberative Politics, Cambridge 2023.
View in Google Scholar
Heawood J., “Pseudo-public Political Speech. Democratic Implications of the Cambridge Analytica Scandal,” Information Polity, vol. 23, no. 4 (2018), pp. 429-434, https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180009.
View in Google Scholar
Hobbes T., Leviathan, Oxford 2014.
View in Google Scholar
Hobbes T., Writings on Common Law and Hereditary Right, Oxford 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Horkheimer M., Critical Theory. Selected Essays, trans. M.J. O’Connell, New York 2002.
View in Google Scholar
Hu M., “Cambridge Analytica’s Black Box,” Big Data & Society, vol. 7, no. 2 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951720938091.
View in Google Scholar
Kassner M., “O pierwszeństwie interpretacji przed ontologią. Przyczynek do krytyki realizmu w filozofii nauk społecznych,” Teoria Polityki, no. 3 (2019), pp. 123-145, https://doi.org/10.4467/25440845TP.19.006.10289.
View in Google Scholar
Kułakowska M., “Interpretive Theories in Political Science,” Teoria Polityki, no. 4 (2020), pp. 31-41, https://doi.org/10.4467/25440845TP.19.014.11780.
View in Google Scholar
Locke J., An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. A. Campbell Fraser, introd. W.R. Ott, 2004.
View in Google Scholar
Locke J., Two Treatises of Government and a Letter Concerning Toleration, ed. and introd. I. Shapiro, New Haven 2008.
View in Google Scholar
Plato, The Republic, Cambridge 2018.
View in Google Scholar
Rousseau J.J., The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, Cambridge 2019.
View in Google Scholar
Rutkowski P., “Homo Cōnsūmēns. Kulturowy model człowieka w epoce zglobalizowanego kapitalizmu kognitywnego,” Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis, Studia Politologica, vol. 22, no. 297 (2019), pp. 37-52, https://doi.org/10.24917/20813333.22.3.
View in Google Scholar
Schäfer S., Muller P., Ziegele M., “The Double-Edged Sword of Online Deliberation. How Evidence-based User Comments Both Decrease and Increase Discussion Participation Intentions on Social Media,” New Media & Society, vol. 23, no. 3 (2024), pp. 1403-1428, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211073059.
View in Google Scholar
Stiegler B., The Age of Disruption. Technology and Madness in Computational Capitalism, Newark 2019.
View in Google Scholar
Stiegler, B., The Decadence of Industrial Democracies, Cambridge 2011.
View in Google Scholar
Stiegler B., La Télécratie contre la Démocratie, Paris 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Stiegler B., The Neganthropocene, London 2018.
View in Google Scholar
Stiegler B., States of Shock. Stupidity and Knowledge in the 21st Century, Cambridge 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Stiegler B., Taking Care of Youth and the Generations, Stanford 2010.
View in Google Scholar
Stiegler B., Technics and Time, vol. 1: The Fault of Epimetheus, Stanford 1998.
View in Google Scholar
Zuboff Sh., The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power, New York 2019.
View in Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
