Is BJP Conservative?

In Search of India’s Conservative Party

Authors

  • Krzysztof Iwanek Asia Research Centre, War Studies University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.16.2019.59.04

Keywords:

Indian politics, Indian conservatism, Hindu conservatism, Hindu nationalism, Bharatiya Janata Party, Ramrajya Parishad

Abstract

This article will consider whether the Bharatiya Janata Party (the BJP), the party currently ruling India, may be considered conservative. The author will use Swapan Dasgupta’s 2015 lecture on conservatism as a starting point for further deliberations. While agreeing with some of Dasgupta’s points, the author will conclude that the defining elements of Indian conservatism which he had proposed can, at the same time, define Hindu nationalism as well. To find the difference between the two, the text will consider a few historical examples of disputes and cooperation between the parties of the Hindu Right (and between Hindu conservatives and Hindu nationalists in general) such as the issue of the civil code reform, the attitude towards Dalits (untouchables) and the question of monarchy abolition. The final conclusion of the text is that while Hindu nationalism does share certain aspects and goals with Hindu conservatism, it also differs with it on some other points, and thus the BJP is more of a nationalist than a conservative party. It was the Ramrajya Parishad, a small and now defunct party, that in the author’s view represented the strand of Hindu conservatism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Krzysztof Iwanek, Asia Research Centre, War Studies University

is the Head of the Asia Research Centre at the War Studies University. In his academic work, he focuses on Indian history and politics, especially Hindu nationalism and Hindu conservatism. He is a regular contributor to The Diplomat magazine, and an occasional contributor to a number of other publications, such as The Interpreter (by Lowy Institute) or Obserwator Finansowy. He graduated from History (M.A.), Indology (M.A.) and Cultural Studies (PhD), all from the University of Warsaw. In the past he has taught at the Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Warsaw University and Collegium Civitas. He has co-authored a history of modern India (Indie. Od kolonii do mocarstwa. 1857-1947) with Adam Burakowski. His forthcoming book will cover Vidya Bharati: a chain of of private schools run by Hindu nationalists in India.

References

Bharatiya Janata Party, Ek Bharat Shreshtha Bharat. Sabka Saath Sabka Vikas. Election Manifesto 2014, New Delhi 2014.
Google Scholar

Baxter C., Jana Sangh. A Biography of an Indian Political Party, New Delhi 1971, https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-1971-2-228_1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-1971-2-228_1
Google Scholar

Bhagavan M., “Princely States and the Hindu Imaginary: Exploring the Cartography of Hindu Nationalism in Colonial India”, The Journal of Asian Studies, vol. 67, no. 3 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911808001198. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911808001198
Google Scholar

Bhargava R., “What is Secularism For?”, in idem (ed.), Secularism and its Critics, New Delhi 2014.
Google Scholar

Brass P., The Politics of India since Independence, Cambridge 2006, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316257005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316257005
Google Scholar

Chandra B. et al., India’s Struggle for Independence, 1857-1947, New Delhi 2000.
Google Scholar

Chari S., “Nepal: Another Tryst with Constitution”, Organiser, 29 September 2015, at <http://organiser.org//Encyc/2015/9/28/Nepal--Another-Tryst-with-Constitution.aspx?NB=&lang=3&m1=&m2=&p1=&p2=&p3=&p4=>, 21 November 2017.
Google Scholar

Chatterjee P., “Secularism and Tolerance”, in R. Bhargava (ed.), Secularism and its Critics, New Delhi 2014.
Google Scholar

Copland I., The Princes of India in the Endgame of Empire, 1917-1947, Cambridge 1997, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511583292
Google Scholar

Das N., “Opinion: Bring an End to Cow Slaughter”, The Organiser, 14 September 2015, at <http://organiser.org//Encyc/2015/9/14/Opinion-Bring-an-End-to-Cow-Slaughter.aspx?NB=&lang=3&m1=&m2=&p1=&p2=&p3=&p4=>, 21 November 2017.
Google Scholar

Dasgupta S., “How Conservative Is Indian Conservatism”, King’s College London Youtube Channel, 16 December 2015, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0l_3m4w0Tg>, 23 June 2016.
Google Scholar

Dasgupta S., “Indian Conservatism as Protest Movement”, King’s College London Youtube Channel, 16 December 2015, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UdREQdvygY>, 23 June 2016.
Google Scholar

Dasgupta S., “Indian Conservatism and the Compulsions of Political Power”, King’s College London Youtube Channel, 16 December 2015, <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xnVKXvDEKP4>, 23 June 2016.
Google Scholar

Dhooria R.L., I Was a Swayamsevak (An Inside View of the RSS), New Delhi n.d.
Google Scholar

“Editorial”, Sanmārg, 7 May 1957.
Google Scholar

“Editorial”, Sanmārg, 24 June 1957. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3002(57)90137-3
Google Scholar

“Editorial”, Sanmārg, 14 April 1970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8693(70)90127-4
Google Scholar

Erdman H., “Chakravarty Rajagopalachari and Indian Conservatism”, The Journal of Developing Areas, vol. 1, no. 1 (1966).
Google Scholar

Erdman H., “Conservatism in India”, Journal of Contemporary History, vol. 13, no. 4 (1978), https://doi.org/10.1177/002200947801300409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002200947801300409
Google Scholar

Erdman H., The Swatantra Party and Indian Conservatism, Cambridge 1967.
Google Scholar

Gellner E., Narody i nacjonalizm, transl. by T. Hołówka, Warszawa 1991.
Google Scholar

Guha R., India after Gandhi. The History of World’s Largest Democracy, London 2007.
Google Scholar

Huntington S.P., “Conservatism as an Ideology”, The American Political Science Review, vol. 51, no. 2 (1957), https://doi.org/10.2307/1952202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1952202
Google Scholar

Iwanek K., Burakowski A., Indie. Od kolonii do mocarstwa. 1857-2013, Warszawa 2013.
Google Scholar

Jaffrelot C., The Hindu Nationalist Movement and Indian Politics, 1925 to the 1990s. Strategies of Identity-Building, Implantation and Mobilisation (with Special Reference to Central India), New Delhi 1999.
Google Scholar

Jones K., Arya Dharm. Hindu Consciousness in Nineteenth-Century Punjab, New Delhi 2006.
Google Scholar

Karpātrijī mahārāj, Mārksvād aur Rāmrājy, Gorakhpur n.d.
Google Scholar

Karpātrijī mahārāj, “Ye rājnītik dal”, Sanmārg, 23 February 1962.
Google Scholar

Kheer D., Veer Savarkar, Bombay 1966.
Google Scholar

Kirk R., The Conservative Mind. From Burke to Santayana, Chicago 1953.
Google Scholar

Lutgendorf P., The Life of a Text. Performing the Rāmcaritmānas of Tulsidas, Berkeley 1991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520909342
Google Scholar

McGuire J., Copland I. (eds.), Hindu Nationalism and Governance, New Delhi 2007.
Google Scholar

McKean L., Divine Enterprise. Gurus and the Hindu Nationalist Movement, Chicago 1996.
Google Scholar

Savarkar V.D., Hindu Rashtra Darshan, Poona n.d.
Google Scholar

Savarkar V.D., Hindutva. Who Is a Hindu?, New Delhi 2006.
Google Scholar

Sherpa A.N., “Politics in Nepal: Why Is Secular Nepal a Better Idea?”, Organiser, 15 November 2014, at <http://organiser.org//Encyc/2014/11/15/Politics-In-Nepal--Why-is-Secular-Nepal--A-Better-Idea-.aspx?NB=&lang=3&m1=&m2=&p1=&p2=&p3=&p4=>, 21 November 2017.
Google Scholar

Smith D.E., India as a Secular State, Princeton 1963, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400877782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400877782
Google Scholar

Venkataram R., “Uniform Civil Code: Nothing Religious about It”, Organiser, 11 July 2016, at <http://organiser.org//Encyc/2016/7/11/Uniform-Civil-Code---Nothing-Religious-About-it.aspx?NB=&lang=3&m1=&m2=&p1=&p2=&p3=&p4>, 5 March 2017.
Google Scholar

Weiner M., Party Politics in India. The Development of a Multi-Party System, Princeton 1990.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2019-04-29

How to Cite

Krzysztof Iwanek. 2019. “Is BJP Conservative? In Search of India’s Conservative Party”. Politeja 16 (2(59):55-72. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.16.2019.59.04.