Stabilność systemu międzynarodowego – wybrane ujęcia i problemy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.69.04Keywords:
international system, stability, system analysis, research modelsAbstract
Stability of the International System – Selected Issues and Approaches
Classical theoretical concepts offer many possibilities for study the issue of stability of the international system. Therefore, the article presents a brief analysis of the development of this research, but focuses only on selected theoretical models. Despite the constant creation of new concepts and attempts to formalize research on this question, it was not possible to develop common solutions or conclusions. Numerous cognitive problems either resulted from the preliminary assumptions or were a consequence of using simplified research models. That is why theorists, while analyzing the same problems connected with achieving stability at the level of the international system, so often came to different or even opposite conclusions. The aim of this article is to show the diversity of research on stability of the international system, to present some achievements and to try to diagnose the main problems of the discussed theoretical concepts.
Downloads
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Angell N., The Great Illusion: A Study of the Relation of Military Power to National Advantage, Memphis 2012.
Google Scholar
Aron R., Wojna i pokój między narodami, przeł. A. Mielczarek, Warszawa 1995.
Google Scholar
Barbieri K., The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace?, Ann Arbor 2005, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.16590.
Google Scholar
Bertalanffy L. von, Ogólna teoria systemów. Podstawy, rozwój, zastosowania, przeł. E. Woydyłło-Woźniak, Warszawa 1984.
Google Scholar
Collected Papers of Lewis Fry Richardson, red. O.M. Ashford i in., vol. 2: Quantitative Psychology and Studies of Conflict, red. I. Sutherland, Cambridge 1993.
Google Scholar
Crucé E., The New Cyneas of Émeric de la Crucé, Franklin Classics Trade Press, 2018.
Google Scholar
Deutsch K.W., Singer J.D., Multipolar Power System and International Stability, „World Politics” 1964, vol. 16, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.2307/2009578.
Google Scholar
Dungen P., The Abbé de Saint-Pierre and the English ‘Irenists’ of the 18th Century (Penn, Bellers, and Bentham), „International Journal on World Peace” 2000, vol. 17, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.2307/20753253.
Google Scholar
Dunn F.S. i in., The Absolute Weapon: Atomic Power and World Order, red. B. Brodie, New York 1946.
Google Scholar
Dunne A.P., International Theory: To the Brink and Beyond, Westport, Conn. 1996.
Google Scholar
Easton D., A System Analysis of Political Life, New York 1965.
Google Scholar
Frazier R., Kennan, “Universalism”, and the Truman Doctrine, „Journal of Cold War Studies” 2009, vol. 11, nr 2.
Google Scholar
Gaddis J.L., The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War, New York–Oxford 1989.
Google Scholar
Gaddis J.L., The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System, „International Security” 1986, vol. 10, nr 4.
Google Scholar
Gallarotti G.M., The Limits of International Organization: Systematic Failure in the Management of International Relations, „International Organization” 1991, vol. 45, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300033063.
Google Scholar
Gilpin R., Theory of Hegemonic War, „The Journal of Interdisciplinary History” 1988, vol. 18, nr 4.
Google Scholar
Gilpin R., War and Change in World Politics, Cambridge 1981, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664267.
Google Scholar
Gold E., Lewis Fry Richardson. 1881-1953, „Obituary Notices of Fellows of the Royal Society” 1954, vol. 9, nr 1.
Google Scholar
Grotius H., O prawie wojny i pokoju. Trzy księgi, w których znajdują wyjaśnienie prawo natury
Google Scholar
i prawo narodów a także główne zasady prawa publicznego. Tom 1, przeł. R. Bierzanek, Warszawa 1957.
Google Scholar
Grunberg I., Exploring the “Myth” of Hegemonic Stability, „International Organization” 1990, nr 44.
Google Scholar
Hamati-Ataya I., The Missed Promises of Systemic Pragmatism, „International Studies Quarterly” 2012, vol. 56, nr 2.
Google Scholar
Heilbron J., Auguste Comte and Modern Epistemology, „Sociological Theory” 1990, vol. 8, nr 2.
Google Scholar
Hess G.D., An Introduction to Lewis Fry Richardson and His Mathematical Theory of War
Google Scholar
and Peace, „Conflict Management and Peace Science” 1995, vol. 14, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/073889429501400104.
Google Scholar
Hirschman A.O., The Strategy of Economic Development, London 1988.
Google Scholar
James P., Brecher M., Stability and Polarity: New Paths for Inquiry, „Journal of Peace Research” 1988, vol. 25, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/002234338802500104.
Google Scholar
Kaloudis G., Could the United Nations Preserve International Peace?, „International Journal on World Peace” 1993, vol. 10, nr 2.
Google Scholar
Kant I., Do wiecznego pokoju, [w:] I. Kant, Rozprawy z filozofii historii, przekł. i oprac. Translatorium Filozofii Niemieckiej Instytutu Filozofii Uniwersytetu im. Mikołaja Kopernika pod kierunkiem M. Żelaznego, Kęty 2005, s. 164-203.
Google Scholar
Kaplan M.A., System and Process in International Politics, New York 1957.
Google Scholar
Keohane R., Institutional Theory and the Realist Challenge after the Cold War, [w:] Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, red. D.A. Baldwin, New York 1993.
Google Scholar
Keohane R., Martin L.L., The Promise of Institutionalist Theory, „International Security” 1995, vol. 20, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.2307/2539214.
Google Scholar
Keohane R.O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, NJ 1984.
Google Scholar
Kindleberger Ch.P., The World in Depression 1929-1939, Berkeley 1986.
Google Scholar
Kissinger H., Porządek światowy, przeł. M. Antosiewicz, Wołowiec 2017.
Google Scholar
Kissinger H.A., Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy, New York 1957.
Google Scholar
Krzyżanowska I., Współzależność a konfliktowość stosunków międzynarodowych, „Politeja” 2007, nr 8.
Google Scholar
Layne Ch., Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace, „International Security” 1994, vol. 19, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.2307/2539195.
Google Scholar
Lebow R.N., The Long Peace, the End of the Cold War, and the Failure of Realism, „International Organization” 1994.
Google Scholar
Leiserson A., Charles Merriam, Max Weber, and the Search for Synthesis in Political Science, „The American Political Science Review” 1975, vol. 69, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.2307/1957898.
Google Scholar
McGinnis M.D., Richardson, Rationality, and Restrictive Models of Arms Races, „Journal of Conflict Resolution” 1991, vol. 35, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002791035003003.
Google Scholar
Mearsheimer J.J., The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York–London 2001.
Google Scholar
Mearsheimer J.J., Tragizm polityki mocarstw, przeł. P. Nowakowski, J. Sadkiewicz, Kraków 2014.
Google Scholar
Miller J.G., Living Systems, New York 1978.
Google Scholar
Morgenthau H.J., Polityka między narodami. Walka o potęgę i pokój, oprac. K.W. Thompson, przeł. R. Włoch, Warszawa 2010.
Google Scholar
Morgenthau H.J., The Intellectual and Political Functions of Theory, [w:] International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science, red. A. Linklater, London–New York 2000.
Google Scholar
Nicholson M., Lewis Fry Richardson and Causes of War, „British Journal of Political Science” 1999, vol. 29, nr 3.
Google Scholar
Niou E.M.S., Ordeshook P.C., A Theory of the Balance of Power in International Systems, „The Journal of Conflict Resolution” 1986, vol. 30, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002786030004005.
Google Scholar
Niou E.M.S., Ordeshook P.C., Rose G.F., The Balance of Power: Stability in International Systems, Cambridge 1989.
Google Scholar
Rapoport A., Lewis F. Richardson’s Mathematical Theory of War, „Conflict Resolution” 1957, vol. 1, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1177/002200275700100301.
Google Scholar
Riker W.H., The Theory of Political Coalition, New Haven 1962.
Google Scholar
Rosecrance R.N., International Relations: Peace or War?, New York 1973.
Google Scholar
Rosecrance R.N., The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World, New York 1986.
Google Scholar
Russett B. i in., The Democratic Peace, „International Security” 1995, vol. 19, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.2307/2539124.
Google Scholar
Schelling T.C., The Strategy of Conflict, Cambridge 1960.
Google Scholar
Smith R.P, The Influence of the Richardson Arms Race Model, [w:] Lewis Fry Richardson: His Intellectual Legacy and Influence in the Social Science, red. N.P. Gleditsh, Oslo 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31589-4_3.
Google Scholar
Snidal D., The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory, „International Organization” 1985, vol. 39, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002703X.
Google Scholar
Snyder G.H., Mearsheimer’s World – Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security, „International Security” 2002, vol. 27, nr 1.
Google Scholar
Spencer H., The Principles of Sociology, vol. 1, New York 1901.
Google Scholar
The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, red. Ch. Reus-Smit, D. Snidal, Oxford 2010, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199219322.001.0001.
Google Scholar
Waltz K.N., Theory of International Politics, Reading, MA 1979.
Google Scholar
Waltz K.N., Struktura teorii stosunków międzynarodowych, przeł. R. Włoch, Warszawa 2010.
Google Scholar
Waltz K.N., The Stability of a Bipolar World, „Daedalus” 1964, vol. 93, nr 3.
Google Scholar
Webb M.C., Krasner S.D., Hegemonic Stability Theory: An Empirical Assessment, „Review of International Studies” 1989, vol. 15, nr 2.
Google Scholar
Young O.R., International Regimes: Toward a New Theory of Institutions, „World Politics” 1986, vol. 39, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.2307/2010300.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.