La crisi, la política i la llengua
Estratègies de com conceptualitzar la difícil situació econòmica catalana: el cas dels discursos oficials d’Artur Mas dels anys 2010‑2011
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/SI.14.2015.14.07Palavras-chave:
financial crisis, Catalan politics, political discourse, metaphor, euphemismResumo
The aim of this paper is to analyse the official speeches delivered between 2010 and 2011 by the President of Catalan Government, Artur Mas, according to the strategies adopted to talk about the financial crisis and its consequences in the Catalan context. The goal is to capture the perception of these phenomena, which emerge from the linguistic mechanisms that have been used (especially, metaphors).
Referências
CHILTON, P., LAKOFF, G. (2005), “Foreign Policy by Metaphor”, en: Schäffner, Ch., Wenden, A. L. (eds.), Language and Peace, Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 37‑60.
View in Google Scholar
CHILTON, P. (2006), “Metaphors in Political Discourse”, en: Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, vol. 8, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 63‑65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00728-8
View in Google Scholar
DEDAIĆ, M. N. (2006), “Political Speeches and Persuasive Argumentation”, en: Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics, vol. 9, Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 700‑707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-044854-2/00721-5
View in Google Scholar
FOUCAULT, M. (1969), L’Archéologie du savoir, Gallimard, Paris.
View in Google Scholar
JÄGER, S. (2001), “Discourse and knowledge: Theoretical and methodological aspects of a critical discourse and dispositive analysis”, en: Wodak, R., Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE Publications, London–Thousand Oaks–New Delhi, pp. 32‑62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n3
View in Google Scholar
LAKOFF, G. (2009), The Political Mind. A Cognitive Scientist’s Guide to Your Brain and Its Politics, Penguin Books, New York.
View in Google Scholar
LAKOFF, G., JOHNSON, M. (1980), Metaphors We Live By, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
View in Google Scholar
LEEUWEN, T. VAN (2005), Introducing Social Semiotics, Routledge, London–New York. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203647028
View in Google Scholar
MONZÓ, Q. (2012), entrevista en Jot Down, disponible en: http://www.jotdown.es/2012/08/quim‑monzo‑catala/ – 7.06.2015.
View in Google Scholar
WESTEN, D. (2007), The Political Brain, The Role of the Emotion in Deciding the Fate of the Nation, Public Affairs, New York.
View in Google Scholar
WILSON, J. (2001), “Political Discourse”, en: Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Blackwell Publishers, Massachusetts, pp. 398‑415.
View in Google Scholar
WODAK, R. (2001), “The discourse – historical approach”, en: Wodak, R., Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE Publications, London–Thousand Oaks–New Delhi, pp. 63‑94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857028020.n4
View in Google Scholar
ŽIŽEK, S. (2009), First as Tragedy, then as Farce, Verso, London.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2015 Marta Pawłowska
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
