Teaching Note-Taking to Beginners Using a Digital Pen
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.12797/MOaP.24.2018.42.01Mots-clés :
digital pen, note-taking, teaching methodology, consecutive, décalageRésumé
Teaching consecutive interpreting comprises the teaching of many different skills, inter alia note-taking. Translation scholars such as Gile [1983], Matyssek [1989], Andres [2002] and Gillies [2005] have drafted a plethora of manuals, books and articles that suggest different rules, structures, detailed symbols and abbreviations for note-taking.
Teachers of consecutive interpreting face the difficulty of analyzing the students’ notes, giving direct feedback and personal advice at class, often with very limited time at their disposal. Orlando [2010; 2015] suggests using digital pen technology in note-taking training to concentrate on the process of note-taking itself in order to observe improvements and strategies needed to acquire this skill. Thanks to this technology, teachers and students can reflect upon the reasons why students noted in a certain way and used a particular structure.
This article sets out to describe how this approach has been tested at note-taking classes at Innsbruck University, with particular attention given to the analysis of different aspects of the process. The aim of the article is to demonstrate if a digital pen can be useful in training, what are the main advantages in terms of efficacy of teaching and time efficiency inter alia and if it can be used at the beginning of a note-taking course.
Téléchargements
Références
Andres, D. (2002), Konsekutivdolmetschen und Notation, Peter Lang Verlag, Frankfurt.
View in Google Scholar
Gile, D. (1983), “L’enseignement de l’interprétation: utilisation des exercices unilingues en début d’apprentissage”, Traduire, 133(4), pp. 7-12.
View in Google Scholar
Gillies, A. (2005), Note-taking for Consecutive Interpreting – A Short Course, St. Jerome Publishing, Manchester.
View in Google Scholar
Kalina, S. (1998), Strategische Prozesse beim Dolmetschen: Theoretische Grundlagen, empirische Fallstudien, didaktische Konsequenzen, Narr, Tübingen.
View in Google Scholar
Kirchhoff, H. (1979), “Die Notationssprache als Hilfsmittel des Konferenzdolmetschers im Konsekutivvorgang”, in: W. Mair and E. Sallager (eds.), Sprachtheorie und Sprachenpraxis, Narr, Tübingen, pp. 121-133.
View in Google Scholar
Matyssek, H. (1989), Handbuch der Notizentechnik für Dolmetscher: Ein Weg zur sprachunabhängigen Notation, Teil I+II, Julius Groos, Heidelberg.
View in Google Scholar
Orlando, M. (2010), “Digital Pen Technology and Consecutive Interpreting: Another Dimension in Note-Taking Training and Assessment”, The Interpreters’ Newsletter, 15, pp. 71-86.
View in Google Scholar
Orlando, M. (2015), “Implementing Digital Pen Technology in the Consecutive Interpreting Classroom”, in: A. Dörte and M. Behr (eds.), Transkulturalität – Translation – Transfer, Bd. 16, Frank & Timme GmbH, pp. 171-199.
View in Google Scholar
Rozan, J.-F. (1956), La prise de notes en interprétation consécutive, Georg & Cie S.A, Genève.
View in Google Scholar
Willett, R. (1984), “Die Ausbildung zum Konferenzdolmetscher”, in: V. Kapp (ed.), Übersetzer und Dolmetscher, Francke, München, pp. 87-109.
View in Google Scholar
Téléchargements
Publiée
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Merci de créditer les auteurs lors de toute citation : Eleonora Romano (2018)

Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
