Bringing Pyongyang Back: the Prospects for Establishing Multilateral Cooperation Mechanism in East Asia

Authors

  • Agnieszka Batko Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Poliarchia.03.2015.05.02

Keywords:

Cooperation, East Asia, North Korea, Security in the Asia-Pacific, Six-Party Talks

Abstract

In this interconnected world, the multilateral mechanisms become more and more present and relevant. However, East Asia is a notable exception with no such institutionalised tool. The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) remains the most troubling state and the main reason why collaboration has not resulted in strengthening the stability in East Asia. Although a formal dialogue called the Six Party Talks exists, it currently remains in deadlock after two nuclear tests conducted by Pyongyang in 2009. The actions that took place throughout last year have once again drawn greater attention to the Korean Peninsula, raising the possibility of resuming the negotiations. Nevertheless, the question about what this new agenda should include remain relevant. The purpose of this paper is to outline international relations in Northeast Asia from both theoretical and practical perspective and provide ideas on what can be done to facilitate the cooperation between the states.

Author Biography

Agnieszka Batko, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków

A graduate who received her Master’s Degree in “International Relations” at the Jagiellonian University in Kraków in 2015. Her thesis focused on the United States Policy toward Korean Peninsula in the 21st Century. She has also been studying at Griffith University (Australia) and University of Hull (United Kingdom). Currently, she is working as a research assistant at Jagiellonian University, participating in the project relating to cooperation of states in the Asia-Pacific. Her interests include international relations theories, politics in the Asia-Pacific region, U.S. Policy, foreign policy analysis.

References

I. Printed sources:

Auxiliary literature:

– monographs:

Brown Ch., Ainley K., Understanding International Relations, Houndmills–New York 2005.

Keohane R. O., Nye J. S., Power and Interdependence, Glenview 1989.

Sutter R. G., The United States in Asia, Lanham 2008.

Waltz K. N., Theory of International Politics, Long Grove 2002.

– collective works:

Acharya A., Buzan B. (eds.), Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, London–New York 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203861431

Cziomer E., Zyblikiewicz L. W., Zarys współczesnych stosunków międzynarodowych, Warszawa 2005.

– chapters in collective works:

Dunne T., “Realism”, in J. Baylis, S. Smith (eds.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, New York 1997.

– articles in scientific journals/reports:

Batchimeg M., “Mongolia’s DPRK Policy: Engaging North Korea”, Asian Survey, vol. 46, no. 2 (2006), [online] http://dx.doi.org/10/1525/as.2006.46.2.275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2006.46.2.275

Blanchard J. F., Lu F., “Thinking Hard about Soft Power: A Review and Critique of the Literature on China and Soft Power”, Asian Perspective, no. 36 (2012). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2012.0021

Keohane R., “International Institutions: Can Interdependence Work?”, Foreign Policy, no. 110 (1998), [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1149278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1149278

Keohane R. O., Nye J. S. Jr., “Power and Interdependence in the Information Age”, Foreign Affairs, vol. 77, no. 5 (1998), [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/20049052. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20049052

Wacker G., Security Cooperation in East Asia: Structures Trends and Limitations, SWP Research Paper, German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin 2015.

Wendt A., “Collective Identity Formation and the International State”, The American Political Science Review, vol. 88, no. 2 (1994), [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2944711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2944711

Wendt A., “Constructing International Politics”, International Security, vol. 20, no. 1 (1995), [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2539217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539217

Young N., Cho J. H., “China’s Soft Power: Discussions, Resources and Prospects”, Asian Survey, vol. 48, no. 3 (2008), [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/as.2008.48.3.453. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/as.2008.48.3.453

II. Electronic sources:

Primary sources:

Elbegdorj T., Mongolia’s Foreign Policy in the 21st Century, The Brookings Institution 2011, [online] http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/events/2011/6/16%20mongolia/20110616_mongolia.

Japan-China Summit Meeting, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, [online] http://www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/c_m1/cn/page4e_000151.html.

Japan-Mongolia Summit Meeting, Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, [online] http://www.mofa.go.jp/a_o/c_m1/mn/page3e_000240.html.National Security Strategy, Washington 2010, [online] http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf.

U.S. Relations with Mongolia, U.S. Department of State, [online] http://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/2779.htm.

United Nations Security Council Resolution 1718 (2006), [online] http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1718(2006).

Auxiliary literature:

– articles in scientific journals/reports:

Campi A. J., “Ulaanbaatar Dialogue on East Asian Security”, Eurasia Daily Monitor, vol. 11, no. 126 (2014), [online] http://www.jamestown.org/programs/edm/single/?tx_ttnews%5Btt_news%5D=42618&cHash=ec1cf151b8c35e97e5048fb26f02a969#.VPHmQvmG-So.

Capara D. L., Moon K. H. S., Park P., Mongolia: Potential Mediator Between the Koreas and Proponent of Peace in Northeast Asia, The Brookings Institution, [online] http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2015/01/20-mongolia-north-korea-caprara-moon-park.

Chanlett-Avery E., Taylor M. A., “North Korea: U.S. Relations, Nuclear Diplomacy, and Internal Situation”, Foreign Press Center website, 10 November 2010, [online] http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/152629.pdf.

“China’s military rise: the dragon’s new teeth”, The Economist, 7 April 2012, [online] http://www.economist.com/node/21552193.

Dolven B., Kan S. A., Manyin M. E., “Maritime Territorial Disputes in East Asia: Issues for Congress”, Federation of American Scientists website, 30 January 2013, [online] https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/R42930.pdf.

Haba K., The Power Shift: National Anxiety, Territorial Disputes and Confidence Building in Asia under the American Rebalance Strategy, a presentation at the 12th Rhodes Forum, 27 September 2014, [online] http://wpfdc.org/images/docs/Kumiko_Haba_Rhodes_2014_web.pdf.

Hassing R., Kongdan O., “Kim Jong-un Inherits the Bomb”, International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, vol. 1, no. 20, (2011), [online] http://www.kinu.or.kr/eng/pub/pub_03_01.jsp?page=1&num=187&mode=view&field=&text=&order=&dir=&bid=DATA03&ses=&category=11.

Nye J. S., “Comparative Regional Integration: Concept and Measurement”, International Organization, vol. 22, no. 4 (1968), [online] http://www.jstor.org/stable/2705847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300013837

Snyder S., Byun S., China-Korea Relations: China’s Red Line on the Korean Peninsula, Center for Strategic and International Studies, [online] http://csis.org/files/publication/1401qchina_korea.pdf.

Ts G., Ulanbaatar Dialogue on the Northeast Asian Security, presentation given during the 9th CSCAP General Conference, 3 December 2013, [online] http://www.cscap.org/uploads/docs/Related%20Research/9GCUlaanbaatarDialogueOnTheNEASecurity-GanbatTs.pdf. – press releases: Japan, Korea Participate in First Summit Since 2012, Nippon: Your Doorway To Japan website, [online] http://www.nippon.com/en/features/h00050/.

Panda A., “U.S. and North Korea: Talking about Talks”, The Diplomat, 4 February 2015, [online] http://thediplomat.com/2015/02/us-and-north-korea-talking-about-talks/.

Panda A., “What Do North Korea And Mongolia Have In Common”, The Diplomat, 30 October 2013, [online] http://thediplomat.com/2013/10/what-do-north-korea-and-mongolia-have-in-common/.

Song S., “Korea’s balancing act in history dispute”, The Korea Herald, 26 January 2014, [online] http://www.koreaherald.com/view.php?ud=20140126000224.

Tiezzi S., “Kerry: Return to the Six Party Talks Possible ‘in the Next Weeks, Months’”, The Diplomat, 25 October 2014, [online] http://thediplomat.com/2014/10/kerry-return-to-sixparty-talks-possible-in-the-next-weeks-months/.

Turner W., “ASEM 2016: Mongolia in the Spotlight”, The Diplomat, 9 December 2014, [online] http://thediplomat.com/2014/12/asem-2016-mongolia-in-the-spotlight/.

Websites:

Asia-Europe Meeting (ASEM), [online] http://www.aseminfoboard.org/about.

Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, [online] http://apec.org/.

Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), [online] http://www.asean.org/.

International Monetary Fund, [online] http://www.imf.org.

Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat website, [online] http://tcs-asia.org/dnb/main/index.php.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-30

How to Cite

Batko, Agnieszka. 2021. “Bringing Pyongyang Back: The Prospects for Establishing Multilateral Cooperation Mechanism in East Asia”. Poliarchia 3 (5):7-23. https://doi.org/10.12797/Poliarchia.03.2015.05.02.

Issue

Section

Stosunki międzynarodowe i geopolityka