The Reasons of Non-Institutional Character of the Early Visegrad Cooperation in the View of Neorealist and Neoliberal Theories in International Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Poliarchia.02.2014.03.05Keywords:
Visegrad Group, VG, neorealism, neoliberal institutionalism, noninstitutional cooperationAbstract
This article examines the reasons for adopting a non‑institutional character of the Visegrad cooperation in the years 1991‑1992. Its focus concerns two causes of the initial reluctance to institutionalise the Visegrad Group: the high level of unpredictability in Central Europe after the collapse of Communism and the symbolic role the Group was expected to play outside the region. These issues are considered through the prism of two theories in International Relations: neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism. Both provide theoretical grounds to support the research hypothesis which assumes that the informal character of the Visegrad cooperation was a pragmatic choice of its founding members. However, neorealist and neoliberal explanations of how the political background and security issues could have influenced their decision vary. The article concludes that the neorealist approach holds more explanatory power in this regard, suggesting that the choice of the Visegrad states was dictated by the preservation of their national interests and subjected to external limitations, rather than motivated by a common intention to facilitate their regional cooperation.
References
I. Books:
Reference literature:
– monographs:
Calvocoressi P., World Politics Since 1945, Harlow 2009.
Jørgensen K.E., International Relations Theory. A New Introduction, London 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36694-7
Keohane R., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton 1984.
Szczepaniak M., Państwa wyszehradzkie, systemy polityczne, gospodarka, współpraca (The Visegrad countries: Political Systems, Economy, Cooperation), Poznań 1996.
Waltz K., Theory of International Politics, New York 1979.
– collective works:
Keohane R., Nye J., Power and Interdependence, New York 2001.
Morgenthau H.J., Thompson K.W., Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York 1985.
Wolchik S.L., Curry J.L., Central and East European Politics: From Communism to Democracy, Plymouth 2011.
– chapters in collective works:
Ash T.G., “The Puzzle of Central Europe” in A. Jagodziński (ed.), The Visegrad Group – A Central European Constellation, Bratislava 2006.
Ben‑Itzhak S., “Realism and Neorealism” in J.T. Ishiyama, M. Breuning (eds.), 21st Century Political Science: A Reference Handbook, 2011.
Bielecki J.K., “Through Visegrad to the West” in A. Jagodziński (ed.), The Visegrad Group – A Central European Constellation, Bratislava 2006.
Chmel R., “My Visegrad Question” in A. Jagodziński (ed.), The Visegrad Group – A Central European Constellation, Bratislava 2006.
Dienstbier J., “Visegrad: The First Phase” in A. Jagodziński (ed.), The Visegrad Group – A Central European Constellation, Bratislava 2006.
Heinze E.A., Jolliff B.J., “Idealism and Liberalism” in J.T. Ishiyama, M. Breuning (eds.), 21st Century Political Science: A Reference Handbook, 2011.
Keohane R., “Neoliberal Institutionalism: A Perspective on World Politics” in Keohane R. (ed.), International institutions and state power: Essays in international relations theory, Boulder 1989.
Keohane R., Martin L., “Institutional Theory as a Research Program” in C. Elman, M.F. Elman (eds.), Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field, Cambridge, MA 2003.
Leska V., Dancák B., Mares M., Morvay P., “Ceská republika a region strední Evropy” (Czech Republic and the Region of Central Europe) in V. Kotyk (ed.), Ceská zahranicní politika.
Úvahy o prioritách (Czech Foreign Policy. Considerations about Priorities), Prague 1997.
Waltz K., “Realist thought and neorealist theory” in R.L. Rothstein, W.T.R. Fox (eds.), The Evolution of Theory in International Relations, Columbia 1992.
– articles in scientific journals:
Andreatta F., Koenig‑Archibugi M., “Which Synthesis? Strategies of Theoretical Integration and the Neorealist‑Neoliberal Debate”, International Political Science Review, vol. 31, no. 2 (2010), [online] DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192512110364258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110364258
Axelrod R., Keohane R., “Achieving Cooperation under Anarchy: Strategies and Institutions”, World Politics, vol. 38, no. 1 (1985). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010357
Dangerfield M., “The Visegrád Group in the Expanded European Union: From Preaccession to Postaccession Cooperation”, East European Politics and Society, vol. 22, no. 3 (2008), [online] DOI: 10.1177/0888325408315840. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325408315840
Hasenclever A., Meyer P., Rittberger V., “Integrating Theories of International Regimes”, Review of International Studies, vol. 26, no. 1 (2000). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500000036
Jervis R., “Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation. Understanding the Debate”, International Security, vol. 24, no. 1 (1999). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560040
Kopecek M. “Politics, Antipolitics, and Czechs in Central Europe: The Idea of ‘Visegrád Cooperation’ and Its Reflection in Czech Politics in the 1990s”, Questionable Return, vol. 12, no. 1 (2002).
Mearsheimer J.J., “The False Promise of International Institutions”, International Security, vol. 19, no. 3 (1994/1995). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078
Szpringer Z., “Publiczne zadłużenie zagraniczne Polski z perspektywy historycznej” (Public Foreign Debt in Poland Seen from the Historical Perspective), Analizy BAS, vol. 69, no. 2
(2012).
– articles:
Kundera M., “The Tragedy of Central Europe”, The New York Review of Books, 26 IV 1984.
II. Electronic publications:
Reference literature:
Declaration on Cooperation between the Czech and Slovak Federal Republic, the Republic of Poland and the Republic of Hungary in Striving for European Integration, adopted in Visegrád on 15 February 1991, the Visegrad Group website, [online] http://www.visegradgroup.eu/documents/visegrad‑declarations/visegrad‑declaration‑110412.
Struktura a vývoj státního dluhu (The Structure and Evolution of Domestic Debt), Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic, [online] http://www.mfcr.cz/cs/verejny‑sektor/hospodareni/rizeni‑statniho‑dluhu/dluhova‑statistika/struktura‑a‑vyvoj‑statniho‑dluhu.
Websites:
Official website of the Visegrad Group – http://www.visegradgroup.eu.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
