Ku dialogicznemu pluralizmowi w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych – o roli, substancji i konsekwencjach podstaw metateoretycznych w praktyce badawczej

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.101.03

Keywords:

metatheory, theory, state, international relations, dialogical pluralism

Abstract

TOWARDS DIALOGICAL PLURALISM IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS – ON THE ROLE, SUBSTANCE AND CONSEQUENCES OF METATHEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS IN RESEARCH PRACTICE
The aims of the article are the following: (1) to point out the rung occupied by metatheory on the ladder of abstraction of the actual work of International Relations scholars; (2) to present a typology of possible metatheoretical approaches to the study of international reality; (3) to provide examples of classic IR works that are based on specific metatheoretical approaches; (4) to help particular scholars to identify their own metatheoretical bases using the aforementioned typology and examples; and (5) to propose an approach allowing ideas to flow between approaches based on different metatheories while maintaining the integrating role of the discipline.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Mateusz Filary-Szczepanik, Ignatianum University in Cracow

    Badacz stosunków międzynarodowych, doktor nauk o polityce. Adiunkt w Katedrze Teorii i Filozofii Polityki na Uniwersytecie Ignatianum w Krakowie. W swoich badaniach naukowych koncentruje się na realistycznej teorii stosunków międzynarodowych. Jego pozostałe zainteresowania to filozofia nauki, metody i proces komponowania badań, historiografia nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych oraz teoria i praktyka odstraszania nuklearnego. Autor monografii pt. Anarchia i dyscyplina. Rzecz o realistycznych teoriach stosunków międzynarodowych Hansa Morgenthaua i Kennetha Waltza (Kraków 2019).

References

Aron R., Pokój i wojna między narodami, [tłum. A. Mielczarek], Warszawa 1995 [1962].
View in Google Scholar

Barbieri K., Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?, „Journal of Peace Research” 1996, vol. 33, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343396033001003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343396033001003
View in Google Scholar

Booth K., Security and Emancipation, „Review of International Studies” 1991, vol. 17, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112033. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112033
View in Google Scholar

Chernoff F., Theory and Metatheory in International Relations: Concepts and Contending Accounts, New York 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230606883
View in Google Scholar

Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, eds I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave, Cambridge 1970.
View in Google Scholar

Debating the Democratic Peace, eds M. Brown, S. Lynn-Jones, S. Miller, Cambridge 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Deutsch K., Political Community in the International Level: Problems of Definition and Measurement, Garden City 1954.
View in Google Scholar

Deutsch K., Toward an Inventory of Basic Trends and Patterns in Comparative and International Politics, „The American Political Science Review” 1960, vol. 54, no. 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1952407
View in Google Scholar

Evaluating Progress in International Relations: How do You Know, eds A. Fryberg-Inan, E. Harrison, P. James, New York 2017.
View in Google Scholar

Filary M., Demystifying Deconstruction – Deconstruction as a Tool for Analysis of IR Theory, „Horyzonty Polityki” 2014, vol. 5, nr 13.
View in Google Scholar

Filary-Szczepanik M., Anarchia i dyscyplina. Rzecz o realistycznych teoriach stosunków międzynarodowych Hansa Morgenthaua i Kennetha Waltza, Kraków 2019.
View in Google Scholar

Filary-Szczepanik M., Discipline in the Times of Cholera, „Global Affairs” 2020, vol. 3, no. 2, https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2020.1842226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2020.1842226
View in Google Scholar

Filary-Szczepanik M., Principle of Economy of Language and the Question of Anthropomorphism of State – a Case of Ockham’s Razor?, „Horyzonty Polityki” 2020, vol. 11, nr 34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35765/hp.1885
View in Google Scholar

Filary-Szczepanik M., Wybrane idee regulatywne w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych, „Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations” 2019, vol. 55, nr 1.
View in Google Scholar

Gałganek A., Filozofia nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych. Ontologia. Epistemologia. Metodologia, Kraków 2021.
View in Google Scholar

Gratzke E., Li Q., Boehmer C., Investing in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict, „International Organization” 2001, vol. 55, no. 2, dx.doi.org/10.1162/00208180151140612. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/00208180151140612
View in Google Scholar

Haliżak E., Obszar badawczy nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych, „Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations” 2015, vol. 51, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.7366/020909613201701.
View in Google Scholar

Haliżak E., Przedmiot, teoria i metodologia nauki o stosunkach międzynarodowych, „Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations” 2015, vol. 51, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.7366/020909611201501.
View in Google Scholar

Hajduk Z., Geneza teorii naukowych. Uaktualniona forma kontrowersji o pluralizm metodologii, „Roczniki Filozoficzne” 2002, vol. 50, nr 3.
View in Google Scholar

Herbut M., Polus A., Syntezy nie osiągniesz? Holizm konfirmacyjny wobec dyskursu teoretycznego w Stosunkach Międzynarodowych, „Politeja” 2022, vol. 19, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.19.2022.76.11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.19.2022.76.11
View in Google Scholar

Jackson P., The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations, New York 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843321
View in Google Scholar

Jørgensen K., What is International Relations?, Bristol 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529210965.001.0001
View in Google Scholar

Kaplan M., Problems of Theory Building and Confirmation in International Relations, „World Politics” 1961, vol. 14, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.2307/2009553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009553
View in Google Scholar

Kaplan M., System and Process in International Relations, Colchester 2005 [1957].
View in Google Scholar

Klahr D., Simon H., Studies of Scientific Discovery: Complementary Approaches and Convergent Findings, „Psychological Bulletin” 1999, vol. 125, nr 5, https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.5.524
View in Google Scholar

Kozub-Karkut M., Realizm neoklasyczny w perspektywie teorii stosunków międzynarodowych i polityki zagranicznej, Kraków 2020.
View in Google Scholar

Kozub-Karkut M., Stosunki międzynarodowe. Między pozytywizmem a postpozytywizmem, „Stosunki Międzynarodowe – International Relations” 2016, vol. 52, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.7366/020909612201603.
View in Google Scholar

Krauz-Mozer B., Teorie polityki, Warszawa 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Lakatos I., Pisma z filozofii nauk empirycznych, przeł. W. Sady, Warszawa 1995.
View in Google Scholar

Mearsheimer J., Why the Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault: The Liberal Delusions That Provoked Putin, „Foreign Affairs” 2014, vol. 93, no. 5.
View in Google Scholar

Mearsheimer J., Walt S., Leaving Theory Behind: Why Simplistic Hypothesis Testing is Bad for International Relations, „European Journal of International Relations” 2013, vol. 19, no. 3, https://doi.org/10.1177/135406611349432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494320
View in Google Scholar

Morgenthau H., Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York 1948. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2086875
View in Google Scholar

Motycka A., Ideał racjonalności. Szkice o filozoficznych rozdrożach nauki, Wrocław 1986.
View in Google Scholar

Motycka A., Główny problem epistemologiczny filozofii nauki, Wrocław 1990.
View in Google Scholar

Neorealism and Its Critics, ed. R. Keohane, New York 1986.
View in Google Scholar

Popper K., Logika odkrycia naukowego, przeł. U. Niklas, Warszawa 1977.
View in Google Scholar

Popper K., Wiedza obiektywna. Ewolucyjna teoria epistemologiczna, przeł. i przyp. opatrzył A. Chmielewski, Warszawa 1992.
View in Google Scholar

Positivism and Beyond, eds K. Booth, S. Smith, M. Zaleski, Cambridge 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Progress in International Relations Theory: Apprising the Field, eds C. Elman, M. Fendius-Elman, Cambridge, MA 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Pugacewicz T., Teorie polityki zagranicznej. Perspektywa amerykańskiej analizy polityki zagranicznej, Kraków 2017.
View in Google Scholar

Reichenbach H., Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge, Chicago 1938.
View in Google Scholar

Romine T., McCleary K., Mossburg Ch., A Stanford University Instructor Has Been Removed from the Classroom Amid Reports They Called Jewish Students Colonizers and Downplayed the Holocaust, CNN News, 13 X 2013, [online] https://edition.cnn.com/2023/10/13/us/stanford-instructor-jewish-holocaust-comments-reaj/index.html.
View in Google Scholar

Sady W., Racjonalna rekonstrukcja odkryć naukowych, Lublin 1990.
View in Google Scholar

Scientific Realism and International Relations, eds J. Joseph, C. Wight, Basingstoke 2010.
View in Google Scholar

Searle J., The Construction of Social Reality, New York 1995.
View in Google Scholar

Sill R., Katzenstein P., Beyond Paradigms: Analytic Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics, Basingstoke 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-01359-0_1
View in Google Scholar

Simons A.H., Models of Discovery: And Other Topics in the Method of Science, Dordrecht 1977.
View in Google Scholar

Studia bezpieczeństwa, red. P. Williams, Kraków 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Tanious M., The Impact of Economic Interdependence on the Probability of Conflict Between States: The Case of American-Chinese Relationship on Taiwan Since 1995, „Review of Economics and Political Science” 2018, vol. 4, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1108/REPS-10-2018-010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/REPS-10-2018-010
View in Google Scholar

The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E.N. Zalta, [online] https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/scientific-discovery/.
View in Google Scholar

Ungerer J., Assessing the Progress of the Democratic Peace Research Program, „International Studies Review” 2012, vol. 14, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01103.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2012.01103.x
View in Google Scholar

Walker T., The Perils of Paradigm Mentalities: Revisiting Kuhn, Lakatos, and Popper, „Perspectives on Politics” 2010, vol. 8, no. 2, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710001180
View in Google Scholar

Waltz K., Theory of International Politics, New York 1979.
View in Google Scholar

Wendt A., Perceptions of the European Union’s Identity in International Relations, ed. A. Skolimowska, London 2018.
View in Google Scholar

Wendt A., Społeczna teoria stosunków międzynarodowych, przeł. W. Derczyński, Warszawa 2008 [1999].
View in Google Scholar

Wendt A., The State as Person in International Theory, „Review of International Studies” 2004, vol. 30, no. 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210504006084
View in Google Scholar

Widening the World of International Relations, eds E. Aydınlı, G. Biltekin, New York 2018.
View in Google Scholar

Zahar E., Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Invention?, „British Journal for the Philosophy of Science” 1983, vol. 34, no. 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/34.3.243
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

28-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“Ku Dialogicznemu Pluralizmowi W Nauce O Stosunkach Międzynarodowych – O Roli, Substancji I Konsekwencjach Podstaw Metateoretycznych W Praktyce Badawczej”. 2026. Politeja 23 (1(101): 59-80. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.23.2026.101.03.