Stała Współpraca Strukturalna (PESCO) jako przykład dyferencjalizmu eksperymentalnego w Unii Europejskiej

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.20.2024.88.1.10

Keywords:

Permanent Structured Cooperation, experimental differentialism, European Union

Abstract

POLAND IN THE EUROPEAN UNION TOWARDS EUROSCEPTIC SELF-ISOLATION

By joining the European Union on 1 May 2004, Poland symbolically finalized the transformation process from the position of a nation state (NS) towards a member state (MS). The European Union Member States, in addition to being the main actors of the integration process, are also affected by various natural centrifugal forces in this atypical international organization. It results from selfishness and particularism of the states as well as from natural national selfinterests, on which stable national preferences are clearly defined and exposed by member states. From the perspective of the transformation process of Poland as the largest and most important EU member state located in Central and Eastern Europe, we can distinguish two periods: 1. 2004-2015. At that time, Poland strongly supported the European Commission (EC) and the Community method, which gives the EC a central role in the decision-making process. This period can be defined by the process of transition from a nation state to a Member State. 2. From 2015, when Poland was ruled by anti-liberal and more Eurosceptic government. This period, in turn, can be defined by the hybrid accumulation of features of a national state and a Member State, which makes us deal with a national member state (NMS). However, the tendency that can be observed runs in the direction of a backward transformation from a Member State to a nation-state. The subject of this study is only the second period in the European policy of Poland expressed by the accumulation of the features of NS and MS with a tendency in the reverse direction of transformation from a Member State to a nation- state. The main research thesis focuses on the statement that after 2015 Poland in the European Union drifts towards Eurosceptic self-isolation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

Author Biography

Janusz Ruszkowski, Jean Monnet Chair ad Personam; University of Szczecin, oland

Politolog, europeista, prof. dr hab. w Instytucie Nauk o Polityce i Bezpieczeństwie Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, Jean Monnet Chair ad Personam oraz kierownik Katedry Studiów Międzynarodowych i Europejskich, Jean Monnet Centre of Excellence. Zainteresowania naukowe: procesy europeizacji, wielopoziomowe zarządzanie i ponadnarodowość w Unii Europejskiej, teorie i metody w studiach europejskich.

References

Adler-Nissen R., Behind the Scenes of Differentiated Integration: Circumventing National Opt-Outs in Justice and Home Affairs, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2009, vol. 16, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802453239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802453239
Google Scholar

Andersen S.S., Sitter N., Differentiated Integration: What Is It and How Much Can the EU Accommodate, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2006, vol. 28, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330600853919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330600853919
Google Scholar

Biała Księga w sprawie przyszłości Europy. Refleksje i scenariusze dotyczące przyszłości UE-27 do 2025 r., COM(2017) 2025 final.
Google Scholar

Börzel T.A., Experimentalist Governance in the EU: The Emperor’s New Clothes, „Regulation & Governance” 2012, vol. 6, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01159.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01159.x
Google Scholar

Bunge M., Matter and Mind. A Philosophical Inquiry, Dordrecht 2010, Boston Studies in The Philosophy and History of Science, vol. 287, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9225-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9225-0
Google Scholar

Bunge M., Treatise on Basic Philosophy, vol. 4: Ontology II: A World of Systems, Dordrecht 1979, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9392-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-9392-1
Google Scholar

Buras P., Dyskusja o finalité politique Unii Europejskiej. Przegląd stanowisk, [w:] Polska – Unia Europejska. W pół drogi. Wybrane problemy, red. M.A. Cichocki, Warszawa 2002.
Google Scholar

Challenges of Multi-Level Constitutionalism. IVR 21st World Congress, Lund, Sweden, 12-18 August 2003 Law and Political in Search of Balance, red. J. Nergelius, P. Policastro, K. Urata, Cracow 2004.
Google Scholar

Cianciara A.K., De Facto Differentiated Disintegration in the European Union. The Case of Poland, „Journal of European Integration” 2023, vol. 45, nr 6, https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2212122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2212122
Google Scholar

Cianciara A.K., (De-)legitimating Differentiated (Dis)integration in the European Union: Between Technocratic and Populist Narratives, „Journal of Contemporary European Research” 2021, vol. 17, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v17i2.1179
Google Scholar

Cianciara A.K., Differentiated Integration and the Future of Europe. Debate in Poland, „Yearbook of Polish European Studies” 2014, nr 17.
Google Scholar

Decyzja Rady (WPZiB) 2017/2315 z dnia 11 grudnia 2017 r. w sprawie ustanowienia stałej współpracy strukturalnej (PESCO) oraz ustalenia listy uczestniczących w niej państw członkowskich, Dz. Urz. UE 2017, L 331.
Google Scholar

Dyson K., Marcussen M., Transverse Integration in European Economic Governance: Between Unitary and Differentiated Integration, „Journal of European Integration” 2010, vol. 32, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330903375107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330903375107
Google Scholar

Explaining Institutional Change. Ambiguity, Agency, and Power, red. J. Mahonney, K. Thelen, Cambridge 2010, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806414
Google Scholar

Explaining Social Institution, red. J. Knight, J. Sened, Michigan 1995, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14827. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14827
Google Scholar

Fossum J.E., Reflections on Experimental Governance, „Regulation & Governance” 2012, vol. 6, nr 3, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01158.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01158.x
Google Scholar

Franco-British Summit, London, 24 November 2003. Strengthening European Cooperation in Security and Defence Declaration, [online] https://dorie.ec.europa.eu/en/web/dorie/details/-/card/125359.
Google Scholar

Franco-British Summit, Le Touquet, 4 February 2003, [w:] From Copenhagen to Brussels. European Defence: Core Documents, red. A. Missiroli, Paris 2003, Chaillot Paper, nr 67.
Google Scholar

Hooghe L., Marks G., Grand Theories of European Integration in the Twenty-First Century, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2019, vol. 26, nr 8, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1569711
Google Scholar

Jensen C.B., Slapin J.B., Institutional Hokey-Pokey: The Politics of Multispeed Integration in the European Union, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2012, vol. 19, nr 6, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.610694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.610694
Google Scholar

Leruth B., Experimental Differentiation as an Innovative Form of Cooperation in the EU: Evidence from the Nordic Battlegroup, „Contemporary Security Policy” 2023, vol. 44, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2143890. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2143890
Google Scholar

Leruth B., Lord Ch., Differentiated Integration in the European Union: A Concept, a Process, a System or a Theory?, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2015, vol. 22, nr 6, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1021196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1021196
Google Scholar

Lindström G., The Origins of The Battlegroups, [w:] G. Lindström, Enter the EU Battlegroups, Paris 2007, Chaillot Paper, nr 97.
Google Scholar

Neve de J.-E., The European Onion? How Differentiated Integration is Reshaping the EU, „Journal of European Integration” 2007, vol. 29, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330701502498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330701502498
Google Scholar

Niemann A., Explaining Decisions in the European Union, Cambridge 2006, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492044
Google Scholar

Podraza A., Unia Europejska w procesie reform traktatowych, Lublin 2007.
Google Scholar

Princen S. i in., Different Yet the Same? Differentiated Integration and Flexibility in Implementation in the European Union, „West European Politics” 2022, December, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2150944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2022.2150944
Google Scholar

Rezolucja Parlamentu Europejskiego z dnia 17 stycznia 2019 r. w sprawie zróżnicowanej integracji, 2018/2093/INI.
Google Scholar

Ruszkowski J, Europeizacja ad extra w zarządzaniu zewnętrznym (external governance) Unii Europejskiej, „Rocznik Integracji Europejskiej” 2010, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.14746/rie.2010.4.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rie.2010.4.1
Google Scholar

Ruszkowski J., From Finalité Politique to Multifinalité. Theoretical Basis Explaining the Turn in the Process of Defining the Future of the European Union, „Romanian Journal of European Integration” 2020, vol. 20, nr 2.
Google Scholar

Ruszkowski J., Podstawy ontologii zróżnicowanej integracji, [w:] Europa wielu prędkości. Problemy, wyzwania, konsekwencje, red. M. Golińczak, R. Klementowski, Wrocław–Warszawa 2021.
Google Scholar

Sabel Ch.F., Zeitlin J., Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture, Oxford 2010.
Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig F., Brexit: Differentiated Disintegration in the European Union, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2018, vol. 25, nr 8, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1467954. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1467954
Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig F., Winzen T., Grand Theories, Differentiated Integration, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2019, vol. 26, nr 8, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1576761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1576761
Google Scholar

Schimmelfennig F., Winzen T., Instrumental and Constitutional Differentiation in the European Union, „Journal of Common Market Studies” 2014, vol. 52, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12103
Google Scholar

Shilin A., Building Euro Area Bodies: The Institutionalisation of Differentiated Integration in Economic and Monetary Union, „Comparative European Politics” 2023, September, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-023-00368-y. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-023-00368-y
Google Scholar

Stubb A.C.-G., A Categorization of Differentiated Integration, „Journal of Common Market Studies” 1996, vol. 34, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00573.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00573.x
Google Scholar

The New Intergovernmentalism. States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era, red. Ch.J. Bickerton, D. Hodson, U. Puetter, Oxford 2015, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703617.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703617.001.0001
Google Scholar

Traktat o Unii Europejskiej, wersja skonsolidowana, Dz. Urz. UE 2016, C 202.
Google Scholar

Tsoukalis L., In Defence of Europe. Can the European Project Be Saved?, Oxford 2016.
Google Scholar

Warleigh-Lack A., Differentiated Integration in the European Union: Towards a Comparative Regionalism Perspective, „Journal of European Public Policy” 2015, vol. 22, nr 6, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020837. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020837
Google Scholar

Wolfe D.A., Experimental Governance: Conceptual Approaches and Practical Cases, Paris–Brussels 2018.
Google Scholar

Published

2024-07-01

How to Cite

Ruszkowski, Janusz. 2024. “Stała Współpraca Strukturalna (PESCO) Jako przykład Dyferencjalizmu Eksperymentalnego W Unii Europejskiej”. Politeja 21 (1(88/1):157-74. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.20.2024.88.1.10.

Issue

Section

Część 2. Reforma wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony UE (2016-2023)