Wzrost zastępuje cykliczność – wpływ powstania ekonomii klasycznej na rozwój myśli politycznej

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.22.2025.99.01

Keywords:

commerce society, classical economics, liberal meliorism, idea of progress, republicanism

Abstract

GROWTH REPLACES CYCLICALITY – THE IMPACT OF THE EMERGENCE OF CLASSICAL ECONOMICS ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF POLITICAL THOUGHT

This article analyses impact of early political economy on evolution of political thought in Europe, tracing writings of David Hume and Josiah Tucker especially. Their economic theories goes to overcoming an old republican tradition of political thought. In republican thought civil virtue was fundamental for the Republic and pursuit of wealth taken as destructive for virtue. So, the main consequence of emergence of political economy was abandoning virtue – wealth contradiction. Wealth was no longer destructive for virtues (especially military ones) and became factor creating good manners, developing arts and sciences and, at the same time, backing military strenght Recognition of possibilities of economic growth by political economist paved the way to neglect the difference, important earlier, between Republic and Monarchy. In political economists’ opinion, Commerce Society thrives in different nations, having different political systems, in all produces wealth, emergence of arts and sciences and reduces social conflicts. Thus, in different political systems economic growth similarly creates more security and freedom. In consequence the main aim of political thought became not stability, but growth.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Dariusz Grzybek, Jagiellonian University

    Profesor uczelni na Wydziale Zarządzania i Komunikacji Społecznej Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego. Zajmuje się historią myśli ekonomicznej, historią myśli politycznej oraz teorią systemów politycznych. Ostatnio opublikował książki: Kwestia płacy roboczej w klasycznej ekonomii politycznej, Kraków 2018; Rosnąca współzależność. Geneza rządzenia światowego, Kraków 2019.

References

Angehrn E., Filozofia dziejów, przeł. J. Marzęcki, Kęty 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Arystoteles, Polityka, przeł. L. Piotrowicz, Wrocław 1953.
View in Google Scholar

Aspromourgos T., On the Origins of Classical Economics: Distribution and Value from William Petty to Adam Smith, London–New York 2011.
View in Google Scholar

Baron H., The Crisis of the Early Italian Renaissance: Civic Humanism and Republican Libert in an Age of Classicissm and Tyranny, Princeton 1966.
View in Google Scholar

Berdell J.F., The Present Relevance of Hume’s Open-Economy Monetary Dynamics, „Economic Journal” 1995, vol. 105, no. 432, s. 1205-1217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2235412
View in Google Scholar

Blaug M., Teoria ekonomii ujęcie retrospektywne, przeł. I. Budzyńska i in., Warszawa 2000.
View in Google Scholar

Burke P., Tacitism, Scepticism, and Reason of State, [w:] The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700, red. J.H. Burns, M. Goldie, Cambridge 2006, s. 483-484.
View in Google Scholar

Bury J.B., Idea of Progress: An Inquiry into its Origin and Growth, London 1920.
View in Google Scholar

Cabrini A.M., Machiavelli’s Florentine Histories, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli, red. J.M. Najemy, Cambridge 2010, s. 123-142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521861250.009
View in Google Scholar

The Cambridge Companion to the Scottish Enightenment, red. A. Broadie, C. Smith, wyd. 2, Cambridge 2019.
View in Google Scholar

Cantillon R., Ogólne rozważania nad naturalnymi prawami handlu (Essai sur la nature du commerce en general), red. przekładu W. Zawadzki, Warszawa 1938.
View in Google Scholar

Clark G., Pożegnanie z jałmużną. Krótka historia gospodarcza świata, przeł. J. Lang, Poznań 2014.
View in Google Scholar

Clark W.E., Josiah Tucker Economist: A Study in the History of Economics, New York 1903. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/clar91712
View in Google Scholar

Coats A.W., Changing Attitudes to Labour in the Mid-Eighteenth Century, „Economic History Review” 1958, vol. 11, no. 1, s. 35-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1958.tb01626.x
View in Google Scholar

Davis R., The Rise of Protection in England, 1689-1786, „Economic History Review” 1966, vol. 19, no. 2, s. 306-317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0289.1966.tb00975.x
View in Google Scholar

Delvaille J., Essai sur l’histoire de l’idee de progres jusqu’a la fin du XVIII siecle, Paris 1910.
View in Google Scholar

Gładziuk N., Druga Babel. Antynomie siedemnastowiecznej angielskiej myśli politycznej, Warszawa 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Grafton A., Humanism and Political Theory, [w:] The Cambridge History of Political Thought 1450-1700, red. J.H. Burns, M. Goldie, Cambridge 2008, s. 92-29.
View in Google Scholar

Gray J., Liberalizm, przeł. R. Dziubecka, Kraków 1994.
View in Google Scholar

Grzybek D., Handel i pokój. Geneza i ewolucja liberalnego pacyfizmu, Kraków 2015.
View in Google Scholar

Grzybek D., Kwestia płacy roboczej w klasycznej ekonomii politycznej, Kraków 2018.
View in Google Scholar

Harley C.K., British and European Industrialization, [w:] The Cambridge History of Capitalism, red. L. Nealand, J.G. Williamson, vol. 1, The Rise of Capitalism: Fron Ancient Origin to 1848, Cambridge 2015.
View in Google Scholar

Hill Ch., The World Turned Upside Down: Radical Ideas during the English Revolution, London 2019.
View in Google Scholar

Hirschman A.O., Namiętności i interesy. U intelektualnych źródeł kapitalizmu, przeł. I. Topińska, M. Kochanowicz, Kraków 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Hont I., Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, Cambridge (Mass.)–London 2010.
View in Google Scholar

Hume D., The Philosophical Works of David Hume, vol. 3, Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary, Edinburgh 1826.
View in Google Scholar

Hutchison T.W., Before Adam Smith: The Emergence of Political Economy 1662-1776, Cambridge (Mass.) 1990.
View in Google Scholar

Irwin D.A., Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade, Princeton 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Landreth H., Colander D.C., Historia myśli ekonomicznej, przeł. A. Szeworski, Warszawa 1998.
View in Google Scholar

Larrere C., Montesquieu on Economics and Commerce, [w:] D.W. Carrithers, M.A. Mosher,
View in Google Scholar

W. Letwin, The Origins of Scientific Economics: English Economic Thought 1660-1776, London–New York 2010.
View in Google Scholar

Lindert P.H., Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth Since the Eighteenth Century, vol. 1, Cambridge 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Lis R., Ku społeczeństwu cywilnemu i bogactwu narodów. Główne koncepcje polityczne i prawne szkockiego Oświecenia, Kraków 2014.
View in Google Scholar

Machiavelli and Republicanism, red. G. Bock, Q. Skinner, M. Viroli, Cambridge 1990.
View in Google Scholar

Machiavelli N., Książę, przeł. C. Nanke, Kęty 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Machiavelli N., Rozważania nad pierwszym dziesięcioksięgiem historii Rzymu Liwiusza, przeł. K. Żaboklicki, Warszawa 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323513056
View in Google Scholar

Mason H., Optimism, Progress, and Philosophical History, [w:] M. Goldie, R. Wokler, The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Political Thought, Cambridge 2006, s. 195-217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521374224.009
View in Google Scholar

Mayer T., David Hume and Monetarism, „Quarterly Journal of Economics” 1980, vol. 95, no. 1, s. 89-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1885350
View in Google Scholar

McCloskey D.N., Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics can’t Explain the Modern World, Chicago 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226556666.001.0001
View in Google Scholar

Pietrzyk-Reeves D., Ład Rzeczypospolitej. Polska myśl polityczna XVI wieku a klasyczna tradycja republikańska, Kraków 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Pincus S., 1688 The First Modern Revolution, New Haven–London 2009.
View in Google Scholar

Pincus S., Neither Machiavellian Moment nor Possesive Individualism: Commercial Society and the Defenders of the English Commonwealth, „American Historical Review” 1998, vol. 103, no. 3, s. 705-736. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/ahr/103.3.705
View in Google Scholar

Platon, Państwo, przeł. W. Witwicki, Kęty 2020.
View in Google Scholar

Platon, Prawa, przeł. M. Maykowska, Warszawa 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Pocock J.G.A., The Machiavelian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition, Princeton–Oxford 2003.
View in Google Scholar

Polibiusz, Dzieje, t. 1, przeł. S. Hamer, Wrocław 2005.
View in Google Scholar

Pomeranz K., The Great Divergence: China, Europe, and the Making of the Modern World Economy, Princeton–Oxford 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691217192
View in Google Scholar

Rahe P.A., Against Throne and Altar: Machiavelli and Political Theory under the English Republic, Cambridge 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509650
View in Google Scholar

Rahe P.A., Montesquieu and the Logic of Liberty: War, Religion, Commerce, Climate, Terrain, Technology, Uneasiness of Mind, the Spirit of Political Vigilance, and the Foundation of Modern Republic, New Haven–London 2009.
View in Google Scholar

Rahe P.A., Montesquieu’s Science of Politics: Essays on The Spirit of Laws, Lanham 2001.
View in Google Scholar

Rashid S., Adam Smith’s Rise to Fame: A Reexamination of the Evidence, „The Eighteenth Century” 1982, vol. 23, no. 1, s. 64-85.
View in Google Scholar

Robbins C., The Eighteenth-Century Commonwealthman: Studies in the Transition, Development, and Circumstance of English Liberal Thought from the Restoration of Charles II until the War with the Thirteen Colonies, Indianapolis 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Romer D., Makroekonomia dla zaawansowanych, przeł. A. Szeworski, Warszawa 2000.
View in Google Scholar

Rothschild E., Sen A., Adam Smith’s Economics, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Adam Smith, red. K. Haakonsen, Cambridge 2006, s. 319-365. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521770599.013
View in Google Scholar

Schumpeter J.A., History of Economic Analysis, London 1955.
View in Google Scholar

Semmel B., The Hume-Tucker Debate and Pitt’s Trade Proposals, „Economic Journal” 1965, vol. 75, no. 300, s. 759-790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2229674
View in Google Scholar

Skinner A.S., Hume’s Principles of Political Economy, [w:] The Cambridge Companion to Hume, red. D.F. Norton, J. Taylor, wyd. 2, Cambrige 2009, s. 381-413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL9780521859868.012
View in Google Scholar

Skinner Q., Wizje polityki, t. 2, Cnoty renesansowe, przeł. K. Koehler, Warszawa 2020.
View in Google Scholar

Skinner Q., Wolność przed liberalizmem, przeł. A. Czarnecka, Toruń 2013.
View in Google Scholar

Smith A., Badania nad naturą i przyczynami bogactwa narodów, t. 1, przeł. S. Wolff, O. Einfeld, Z. Sadowski, Warszawa 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Thomas P. J., Mercantilism and the East India Trade: An Early Phase of the Protection v. Free Trade Controversy, London 1926.
View in Google Scholar

Truitt Elmslie B., The Convergence Debate Between David Hume and Josiah Tucker, „Journal of Economic Perspectives” 1995, vol. 9, no. 4, s. 207-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.207
View in Google Scholar

Tucker J., Four Tracts on Political and Commercial Subjects, wyd. 2, Glo[u]cester 1774.
View in Google Scholar

Urquhart R., David Hume and Josiah Tucker: Pagan and Christian Political Economy, „History of Economic Ideas” 1995, vol. 3, no. 3, s. 1-33.
View in Google Scholar

Zabieglik S., Wiek doskonalenia. Z filozofii szkockiego Oświecenia, Gdańsk 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

27-11-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

“Wzrost Zastępuje Cykliczność – Wpływ Powstania Ekonomii Klasycznej Na Rozwój Myśli Politycznej”. 2025. Politeja 22 (5(99): 5-27. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.22.2025.99.01.