Libertarianizm i teoria tożsamości
Koncepcja najbliższego kontynuatora Roberta Nozicka jako teoria tła zasady autowłasności
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.14.2017.48.04Keywords:
libertarianism, self‑ownership, closest continuer theory, theory of the person, personal identity over timeAbstract
Libertarianism and the Theory of Personal Identity. Robert Nozick’s Closest Continuer Theory as a Background Theory of the Principle of Self‑Ownership
The research problem of the present paper is the following question: May the closest continuer theory serve as a background theory for the principle of self‑ownership? This issue is a peculiar instance of the more general problem of the anthropological presuppositions of the libertarian political philosophy that can be phrased in a Kantian manner: How is self‑ownership possible?; or in a more detailed way: What sort of entity a human being has to be, if it is possible for him to be a self‑owner? The research thesis that is argued for in the paper says that: 1) the closest continuer theory may not serve as a background theory for a wide principle of self‑ownership since as an example of reductionist theory of personal identity it excludes the possibility of possessing this set of psychological facts which the personal identity is reducible to and possession of which is presupposed by the wide principle of self‑ownership; 2) the closest continuer theory may though serve as a background theory for a narrow principle of self‑ownership since this principle assumes that one can own only scarce resources and psychological facts are not instances thereof.
Downloads
References
Arneson R.J., Lockean Self‑Ownership: Towards a Demolition, „Political Studies” 1991, Vol. 39, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑9248.1991.tb00580.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1991.tb00580.x
View in Google Scholar
Arneson R.J., Property Rights in Persons, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 1992, Vol. 9, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003654
View in Google Scholar
Arneson R.J., Self Ownership and World Ownership: Against Left‑Libertarianism, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 2010, Vol. 27, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509990070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052509990070
View in Google Scholar
Arras J.D., The Way We Reason Now: Reflective Equilibrium in Bioethics, [w:] The Oxford Handbook of Bioethics, red. B. Steinbock, New York 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Arystoteles, Metafizyka, przeł. K. Leśniak, Warszawa 2009.
View in Google Scholar
Barry B., Self Ownership and the Libertarian Challenge, „Times Literary Supplement” 1996, 15 XI.
View in Google Scholar
Block W., Toward a Libertarian Theory of Inalienability: A Critique of Rothbard, Barnett, Smith,
View in Google Scholar
Kinsella, Gordon, and Epstein, „The Journal of Libertarian Studies” 2003, Vol. 17, nr 2.
View in Google Scholar
Cohen G.A., Self‑Ownership, Freedom, and Equality, Cambridge 1995, Studies in Marxism and Social Theory. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521270
View in Google Scholar
Dan‑Cohen M., Responsibility and the Boundaries of the Self, „Harvard Law Review” 1992, Vol. 105, nr 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1341517
View in Google Scholar
Dan‑Cohen M., The Value of Ownership, „The Journal of Political Philosophy” 2001, Vol. 9, nr 4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00134
View in Google Scholar
Daniels N., Reflective Equilibrium, [w:] The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, wiosna 2011, [online] https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2011/entries/reflective‑equilibrium/.
View in Google Scholar
Daniels N., Wide Reflective Equilibrium and Theory Acceptance in Ethics, „The Journal of Philosophy” 1979, Vol. 76, nr 5, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2025881. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2025881
View in Google Scholar
Dominiak Ł., Metoda równowagi refleksyjnej (reflective equilibrium) w filozofii polityki, „Athenaeum.
View in Google Scholar
Polskie Studia Politologiczne” 2012, Vol. 36.
View in Google Scholar
Dominiak Ł., Problem aksjomatyczności zasady autowłasności w filozofii politycznej libertarianizmu, „Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne” 2016, Vol. 49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2016.49.03
View in Google Scholar
Dworkin R., Taking Rights Seriously, London 2013, Bloomsbury Revelations.
View in Google Scholar
Feser E., Personal Identity and Self‑Ownership, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 2005, Vol. 22, nr 2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052505052052
View in Google Scholar
Feser E., Self‑Ownership, Abortion, and the Rights of Children: Toward a More Conservative Libertarianism, „The Journal of Libertarian Studies” 2004, Vol. 18, nr 3.
View in Google Scholar
Filozofia podmiotu, wybór J. Górnicka‑Kalinowska, przeł. B. Chwedeńczuk i in., Warszawa 2001, Fragmenty Filozofii Analitycznej, 8.
View in Google Scholar
Gorr M., Justice, Self‑Ownership, and Natural Assets, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 1995, Vol. 12, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004751. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004751
View in Google Scholar
Haslett D.W., What Is Wrong with Reflective Equilibria?, „The Philosophical Quarterly” 1987, Vol. 37, nr 148, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2220400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2220400
View in Google Scholar
Honoré A.M., Ownership, [w:] Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence (First Series), red. A.G. Guest, Oxford 1961.
View in Google Scholar
Hoppe H.‑H., Democracy – The God That Failed. The Economics and Politics of Monarchy, Democracy, and Natural Order, New Brunswick 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Hoppe H.‑H., Economic Science and the Austrian Method, Auburn 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Hoppe H.‑H., The Economics and Ethics of Private Property. Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy, Auburn 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Hoppe H.‑H., The Great Fiction. Property, Economics, Society, and the Politics of Decline, Baltimore 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Hoppe H.‑H., The Praxeological Foundations of Epistemology and Ethics, Q&A, „Austrian Economics Newsletter” 1988, Vol. 9, nr 2.
View in Google Scholar
Hoppe H.‑H., A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. Economics, Politics, and Ethics, Auburn 2012, Ludwig von Mises Institute’s Studies in Austrian Economics.
View in Google Scholar
Juruś D., W poszukiwaniu podstaw libertarianizmu w perspektywie Rothbardowskiej koncepcji własności, Kraków 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Kant I., Prolegomena do wszelkiej przyszłej metafizyki, która będzie mogła wystąpić jako nauka, przeł. B. Bornstein, Warszawa 1960, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.
View in Google Scholar
Kinsella S., Against Intellectual Property, Auburn 2008.
View in Google Scholar
Kinsella S., How We Come to Own Ourselves, „Mises Daily” 2006, 7 IX, [online] http://mises.org/library/how‑we‑come‑own‑ourselves.
View in Google Scholar
Left‑Libertarianism and Its Critics. The Contemporary Debate, red. P. Vallentyne, H. Steiner, New York 2000.
View in Google Scholar
Lippert‑Rasmussen K., Against Self‑Ownership: There Are No Fact‑Insensitive Ownership Rights over One’s Body, „Philosophy and Public Affairs” 2008, Vol. 36, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1088‑4963.2008.00125.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00125.x
View in Google Scholar
Locke J., Dwa traktaty o rządzie, przeł. Z. Rau, Warszawa 1992, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.
View in Google Scholar
Locke J., Rozważania dotyczące rozumu ludzkiego, t. 2, przeł. B.J. Gawecki, Warszawa 1955, Biblioteka Klasyków Filozofii.
View in Google Scholar
Mack E., The Self‑Ownership Proviso: A New and Improved Lockean Proviso, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 1995, vol. 12, nr 1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004611
View in Google Scholar
McMahan J., The Ethics of Killing. Problems at the Margins of Life, New York 2002, Oxford Ethics Series. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0195079981.001.0001
View in Google Scholar
Nozick R., Anarchy, State, and Utopia, Oxford 1999.
View in Google Scholar
Nozick R., Philosophical Explanations, Cambridge 1981.
View in Google Scholar
The Origins of Left‑Libertarianism. An Anthology of Historical Writings, red. P. Vallentyne, H. Steiner, New York 2000.
View in Google Scholar
Otsuka M., Libertarianism without Inequality, Oxford 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/0199243956.001.0001
View in Google Scholar
Palmer T.G., G.A. Cohen on Self‑Ownership,Property, and Equality, „Critical Review.
View in Google Scholar
A Journal of Politics and Society” 1998, Vol. 12, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08913819808443498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913819808443498
View in Google Scholar
Parfit D., Reasons and Persons, Oxford 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019824908X.001.0001
View in Google Scholar
Pateman C., Self‑Ownership and Property in the Person: Democratization and a Tale of Two Concepts, „The Journal of Political Philosophy” 2002, Vol. 10, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467‑9760.00141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00141
View in Google Scholar
Pendlebury M., Hudson P., Moellendorf D., Capitalist Exploitation, Self‑Ownership, and Equality, „The Philosophical Forum” 2001, Vol. 32, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0031‑806X.00062. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/0031-806X.00062
View in Google Scholar
Rawls J., Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics, „The Philosophical Review” 1951, Vol. 60, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2181696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2181696
View in Google Scholar
Rawls J., A Theory of Justice, Cambridge 1971.
View in Google Scholar
Rothbard M., The Ethics of Liberty, New York 1998.
View in Google Scholar
Rothbard M., For a New Liberty. The Libertarian Manifesto, Auburn 2002.
View in Google Scholar
Ryan A., Self‑Ownership, Autonomy, and Property Rights, „Social Philosophy and Policy” 1994, Vol. 11, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500004507
View in Google Scholar
Sandel M., Liberalism and the Limits of Justice, New York 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511810152
View in Google Scholar
Savigny F.C. von, Das Recht des Besitzes. Eine civilistische Abhandlung, Wien 1865.
View in Google Scholar
Shoemaker S., Swinburne R., Personal Identity, Oxford 1984, Great Debates in Philosophy.
View in Google Scholar
Steiner H., An Essay on Rights, Oxford 1994.
View in Google Scholar
Stump E., Non‑Cartesian Substance Dualism and Materialism without Reductionism, „Faith and Philosophy” 1995, Vol. 12, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/faithphil199512430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil199512430
View in Google Scholar
Taylor R.S., Self‑Ownership and the Limits of Libertarianism, „Social Theory and Practice” 2005, Vol. 31, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200531423. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract200531423
View in Google Scholar
Watner C., The „Criminal” Metaphor in the Libertarian Tradition, „The Journal of Libertarian Studies” 1981, Vol. 5, nr 3.
View in Google Scholar
Weinberg J., Freedom, Self‑Ownership, and Libertarian Philosophical Diaspora, „Critical Review. A Journal of Politics and Society” 1997, Vol. 11, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08913819708443464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08913819708443464
View in Google Scholar
Wile A., Stephan Kinsella on Libertarian Legal Theory, Self‑Ownership, and Drug Laws. Exclusive Interview, „The Daily Bell” 2014, 20 VII, [online] http://www.thedailybell.com/exclusive‑interviews/35492/Anthony‑Wile‑Stephan‑Kinsella‑on‑Libertarian‑Legal‑Theory‑Self‑Ownership‑and‑Drug‑Laws/.
View in Google Scholar
Williams B., Problems of the Self. Philosophical Papers, 1956‑1972, Cambridge 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621253
View in Google Scholar
Wójcik B., Bioetyka i tożsamość człowieka, Tarnów 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Wójcik B., Śmierć mózgu jako kryterium śmierci człowieka – problematyka filozoficzno‑etyczna, „Medycyna Praktyczna” 2007, nr 4.
View in Google Scholar
Wójcik B., Świadomość ponowoczesna i jej krytyka. Funkcjonalizm homunkularny w interpretacji świadomości Daniela C. Dennetta, Kraków 1997, Rozprawy OBI.
View in Google Scholar
Wójcik B., Zasady zachowania tożsamości genetycznej i psychicznej jako wyróżnik bioetyki personalistycznej, „Sympozjum” 2002, Vol. 6, nr 1.
View in Google Scholar
Ziemiński I., Metafizyka śmierci, Kraków 2010, Myśl Filozoficzna – WAM.
View in Google Scholar
Ziemiński I., Moralność i religia. Poglądy filozoficzne Josepha Butlera, Warszawa 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Ziemiński I., Życie wieczne. Przyczynek do eschatologii filozoficznej, Poznań–Kraków 2013, Wykłady Otwarte z Teologii Naturalnej im. J.M. Bochańskiego OP, 4.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
