Somebody Else’s Problem as a Practice in the Identity Discourse

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.68.05

Keywords:

identity, reflective identity, discourse, somebody else’s problem, invalidation

Abstract

The article presents the characteristics of various types of collective identities: hard, programmatic, soft, pluralistic, and proposes an outline of the concept of reflective identity as essential for democratic public discourse. Moreover, the practice of invalidation in the public discourse has been analyzed. Articulated invalidation and silent invalidation have been articulated as two communicative practices and their characteristics. The article presents the social and psychological reasons for invalidation as a practice of public discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ewa Maria Marciniak, University of Warsaw

    Is a PhD in social sciences in the field of political science and a researcher at the University of Warsaw. Her studies focus on the psychological aspects of social communication and political behavior. Marciniak is a member of the Polish Communication Association, the Political Sciences Committee, and an author of many publications including Personalization of The Electoral Behavior in Poland in the Context of the Model for Conformity of Political Preferences (2013); Social Communication (2015); 2015 Elections. Psycho- and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Electorates from The Main Political Parties (2019).

References

Cialdini R.B., Psychologia społeczna, Gdańsk 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Czyżewski M., Dunin K., Piotrowski A., “Cudze problemy, czyli wstęp do sepologii”, in M. Czyżewski, K. Dunin, A. Piotrowski (eds.), Cudze problemy. O ważności tego, co nieważne, Warszawa 1991.
View in Google Scholar

Dąmbska I., “Milczenie jako wyraz i wartość”, Roczniki Filozoficzne, vol. 11, no. 1 (1963).
View in Google Scholar

Dijk T.A. van (ed.), Dyskurs jako struktura i proces, Warszawa 2001.
View in Google Scholar

Duszak A., Tekst, dyskurs, komunikacja międzykulturowa, Warszawa 2009.
View in Google Scholar

Giddens A., The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration, Berkeley–Los Angeles 1986.
View in Google Scholar

Henry B., “Identities of the West: Reason, Myths, Limits of Tolerance”, in H. Friese (ed.), Identities. Time, Difference, and Boundaries, New York–Oxford 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Henry B., “The Role of Symbols for European Political Identity. Political Identity as Myth?”, in F. Cerutti, E. Rudolph (eds.), A Soul for Europe. On the Cultural and Political Identity of the Europeans. An Essay Collection, vol. 2, Louvain 2001.
View in Google Scholar

Hołówka T., Myślenie potoczne. Heterogeniczność zdrowego rozsądku, Warszawa 1986.
View in Google Scholar

Horolets A., Obrazy Europy w polskim dyskursie publicznym, Kraków 2006.
View in Google Scholar

Luhmann N., Systemy społeczne. Zarys ogólnej teorii, Kraków 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Marciniak E.M., “Polityka jako sztuka unieważniania”, in B. Kaczmarek (ed.), Metafory polityki 2, Warszawa 2003.
View in Google Scholar

Markiewicz B., “Sfera publiczna a kwestia tożsamości politycznej”, Filo-Sofija, vol. 24, no. 1 (2014).
View in Google Scholar

Mizińska J., Sztuka prowadzenia sporów. Aksjologiczne przesłanki dialogu, Lublin 1993.
View in Google Scholar

Mouffe C., “Citizenship and Political Identity”, October. The Identity in Question, vol. 61 (1992), https://doi.org/10.2307/778782.
View in Google Scholar

Sierotwiński S., Słownik terminów literackich, Wrocław 1986.
View in Google Scholar

Sztompka P., Sociology, Kraków 2002.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

19-11-2020

Issue

Section

COLLECTIVE IDENTITIES AS/IN POLITICS

How to Cite

“Somebody Else’s Problem As a Practice in the Identity Discourse”. 2020. Politeja 17 (5(68): 101-11. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.17.2020.68.05.