Dispute over the Guardian of the Constitution. Hans Kelsen, Carl Schmitt and the Weimar Case
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.72.10Keywords:
guardian of the constitution, law and politics, Weimar constitutionalism, Hans Kelsen, Carl SchmittAbstract
The paper discusses one of the most important debates on the meaning of constitutional adjudication in the 20th century that engaged two eminent legal and political thinkers Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt. The paper focuses on the constitutional dispute over the guardianship of the constitution in the final years of Weimar’s Germany and reconstructs the arguments of the two major protagonists in this dispute concerning the Weimar constitution and the fundamental question whether the guardian of the constitution is (or should be) the constitutional court or the president of the Reich. The debate highlights the complexity of the political problems of a democratic state, as well as the intricate relationship between law and state and has retained high level of topicality. The paper also pays attention to the philosophical-political premises that underlined the distinctly different views on the relationship between law and politics in the thought of Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt.
Downloads
References
Balakrishan G., The Enemy. An Intellectual Portrait of Carl Schmitt, London–New York 2000.
View in Google Scholar
Baume S., Hans Kelsen and the Case for Democracy, transl. by J. Zvesper, Colchester 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Bendersky J., Carl Schmitt. Theorist for the Reich, Princeton 1983, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400853250.
View in Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus D., Legality and Legitimacy. Carl Schmitt, Hans Kelsen and Hermann Heller in Weimar, Oxford 2003.
View in Google Scholar
Elias N., Germans. Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth
View in Google Scholar
Centuries, M. Schröter (ed.), transl. by E. Dunning, S. Mennell, New York 1996.
View in Google Scholar
Gniazdowski A., Antynomie radykalizmu. Fenomenologia polityczna w Niemczech 1914-1933, Warszawa 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Grzybowski K., Powstanie republiki niemieckiej. Szkic polityczno-prawny, Kraków 1929.
View in Google Scholar
Kalyvas A., “Constituent Power”, in Political Concepts: A Critical Lexicon 3.1 (2013), p. 13, at <http://www.politicalconcepts.org/constituentpower>.
View in Google Scholar
Kelsen H., The Essence and Value of Democracy, N. Urbinati, C. Accetti (eds.), transl. by B. Graf, Lanham–Plymouth 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Kelsen H., Essays in Legal and Moral Philosophy, O. Weinberger (ed.), transl. by P. Heath, Dordrecht–Boston 1973.
View in Google Scholar
Kelsen H., “Das Urteil des Staatsgerichtshoff vom 25. Oktober 1932“, Die Justiz, no. 8 (1932), pp. 65-91.
View in Google Scholar
Kelsen H., “Wer soll der Hüter der Verfassung sein?“ in H. Klecatsky, R. Marcic, H. Schambeck (eds.), Die Wiener rechtstheoretische Schule. Schriften von Hans Kelsen, Adolf Merkl, Alfred Verdross, Bd. 2, Wien 2010.
View in Google Scholar
Kelsen H., “Wesen und Entwicklung der Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit”, in H. Kelsen, Wer soll der Hüter der Verfassung sein?, R. Ch.van Oyen (ed.), Tübingen 2019, https://doi.org/10.1628/978-3-16-158979-9.
View in Google Scholar
Koselleck R., Europäische Umrisse deutscher Geschichte, Heidelberg 1999.
View in Google Scholar
Loewenstein K., “Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights (I)”, The American Political Science Review, vol. 31, no. 3 (1937), pp. 417-432, https://doi.org/10.2307/1948164.
View in Google Scholar
Loughlin M., Walker N. (eds.), The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form, Oxford–New York 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Métall R., Hans Kelsen. Leben und Werk, Wien 1969.
View in Google Scholar
Mommsen H., The Rise and Fall of Weimar Democracy, transl. by E. Forster, L.E. Jones, Chapel Hill–London 1996.
View in Google Scholar
Möller H., Weimar. Niespełniona demokracja, transl. by A. Marcinek, Warszawa 1997.
View in Google Scholar
Naumowicz T. (ed.), Państwo a społeczeństwo. Wizje wspólnot niemieckich od oświecenia do okresu restauracji, Poznań 2001.
View in Google Scholar
Majchrowski J.M., Szlachta B., Wieciech T., Zakrzewski M., O praworządność i zdrowy ustrój państwowy. Zagadnienia zabezpieczenia konstytucyjności ustaw w polskiej myśli politycznej i prawniczej okresu międzywojennego, Kraków 2006.
View in Google Scholar
Peukert D.J.K., Republika Weimarska. Lata kryzysu klasycznego modernizmu, transl. by B. Ostrowska, Warszawa 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Schmitt C., Constitutional Theory, transl. by J. Seitzer, Durham–London 2008, https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822390589.
View in Google Scholar
Schmitt C., Gesetz und Urteil. Eine Untersuchung zum Problem der Rechtspraxis, München 1969.
View in Google Scholar
Schmitt C., Der Hüter der Verfassung, Berlin 2016.
View in Google Scholar
Schmitt C., Legalität und Legitimität, Berlin 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Schmitt C., Positionen und Begriffe im Kampf mit Weimar-Genf-Versailles 1923-1939, Berlin 2014, https://doi.org/10.3790/978-3-428-54327-4.
View in Google Scholar
Schultz E., Jünger F.G., Das Gesicht der Demokratie. Ein Bilderwerk mit Texten zur Geschichte der deutschen Demokratie nach dem Ersten Weltkrieg, Viöl–Nordfriesland 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Sontheimer K., Antidemokratisches Denken in der Weimarer Republik, München 1978.
View in Google Scholar
Szlachta B., Polscy konserwatyści wobec ustroju politycznego do 1939 r., Kraków 2000.
View in Google Scholar
Vinx, L. (ed.), The Guardian of the Constitution. Hans Kelsen and Carl Schmitt on the Limits of Constitutional Law, transl. and ed. by L. Vinx, Cambridge 2015, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316136256.
View in Google Scholar
Voegelin E., “The Authoritarian State. An Essay on the Problem of the Austrian State”, in G. Weiss (ed.), The Collected Works, vol. 4, Columbia–London 1999.
View in Google Scholar
Weitz E.D., Weimar Germany. Hopes and Tragedy, Princeton–Oxford 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
