China – EU’s “Significant Other”?
Not a Chess Game Strategy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.18.2021.73.03Keywords:
European Union, China, strategy, identity, governanceAbstract
Following the idea of the “other” in the work of Ernesto Laclau and the perspective of post-foundational discourse analysis, the study focusses on Chinese strategical internal and external pre- and post-Covid-19 political specifics and policies and how they interact (or contradict) with the “European” vision of the world and most importantly itself. As Laclau says, “the notion of “constitutive outside” emphasizes the always present possibility that differential relationship between an entity and its “constitutive outside” turns into antagonism.” For more than three decades, the EC/EU has been steadily building up its foreign relations architecture and has proven its desire to project its ideals and values worldwide. However, during the same period, after “the century of humiliation,” China has also reached a point in its history where it wants to see the world according to its national interests and views. This work attempts to analyze some key features inherent to both the EU and China, such as strategies, relation with other countries, typical governmental architecture, and some aspects of identity, which could help in better understanding the possible contradictions and areas of cooperation in their way of conceptualizing themselves as key players on the world stage. This will reflect the need for greater European civic awareness in the upcoming decades, as suggested by the author.
Downloads
References
Allison G., Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’ Trap?, London 2018.
View in Google Scholar
Bertram B., “New Reflections on the ‘Revolutionary’ Politics of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe”, Duke University Press, vol. 22, no. 3 (1995), pp. 81-110, https://doi.org/10.2307/303724. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/303724
View in Google Scholar
“China: Communists Likely to Enshrine ‘Xi Jinping Thought’”, DW, 19 October 2017, at https://www.dw.com/en/china-communists-likely-to-enshrine-xi-jinping-thought/a-41027158.
View in Google Scholar
China Investment, Africa Version, Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China (MOFCOM).
View in Google Scholar
Chunrong L., “The New Logic of China’s Global Influence”, Friends of Europe, 12 January 2017, at https://www.friendsofeurope.org/insights/the-new-logic-of-chinas-global-influence/.
View in Google Scholar
Cook S., China’s Global Media Footprint Democratic Responses to Expanding Authoritarian Influence 2021, at https://www.ned.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Chinas-Global-Media-Footprint-Democratic-Responses-to-Expanding-Authoritarian-Influence-Cook-Feb-2021.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
EU Position in World Trade, 2019, at http://ec.europa.eu/trade/policy/eu-position-in-worldtrade/.
View in Google Scholar
Eurostat. China-EU – International Trade in Goods Statistics, 2020, at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=China-EU_-_international_trade_in_goods_statistics#EU-China_most_traded_goods.
View in Google Scholar
Ferguson N., The Square and the Tower, New York 2018.
View in Google Scholar
Grace, A., “China’s Influence Operations Are Pinpointing America’s Weaknesses”, Foreign Policy, 10 April 2018, at https://foreignpolicy.com/2018/10/04/chinas-influenceoperations-are-pinpointing-americas-weaknesses/.
View in Google Scholar
Gu J., China’s Private Enterprises in Africa and the Implications for African Development. The Power of the Chinese Dragon, London 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57449-7_7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-57449-7_7
View in Google Scholar
Hartz R., “‘The People’ and Its Antagonistic Other: The Populist Right-Wing Movement Pegida in Germany”, in T. Marttila (ed.), Discourse, Culture and Organization. Postdisciplinary Studies in Discourse, Cham 2019, pp. 223-244, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94123-3_10
View in Google Scholar
Hemenway D., “Chinese Strategic Engagement with Assad’s Syria”, Atlantic Council, 21 December 2018, at https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/syriasource/chinese-strategicengagement-with-assad-s-syria/.
View in Google Scholar
Herbert J., “Ssŭma Ch’ien’s Historical Records: Introductory Chapter,” transl. by H.J. Allen, The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1894).
View in Google Scholar
“Hu Jintao Calls for Enhancing ‘Soft Power’ of Chinese Culture”, Beijing Review, November 2017, at http://www.bjreview.com.cn/17thCPC/txt/2007-10/15/content_80539.htm.
View in Google Scholar
Huaxia, “What are China’s Two Centennial Goals and Why do They Matter?”, New China, 17 October 2017, at http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2017-10/17/c_136686770.htm.
View in Google Scholar
“Is China Taking Advantage of COVID-19 to Pursue South China Sea Ambitions?”, DW, 26 May 2020, at https://www.dw.com/en/is-china-taking-advantage-of-covid-19-to-pursuesouth-china-sea-ambitions/a-53573918.
View in Google Scholar
Jacques M., at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uBjvklYLShM – [00:02:42-00:04:05].
View in Google Scholar
Kissinger H., On China, New York 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Kissinger H., World Order, New York 2014.
View in Google Scholar
Labrador E.C., “The Venezuelan Exodus”, Council on Foreign Relations, 2019, at https://www.cfr.org/in-brief/venezuelan-exodus.
View in Google Scholar
Leung K. et al., “Culture and International Business: Recent Advanced and Future Directions”, Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 36 (2005), pp. 357-378, https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400150
View in Google Scholar
Mohan G., “China in Africa: Impacts and Prospects for Accountable Development”, in S. Hickey, K. Sen, B. Bukenya (eds.), The Politics of Inclusive Development: Interrogating the Evidence, Oxford 2014, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722564.003.0011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722564.003.0011
View in Google Scholar
Shambaugh D., “China’s Quiet Diplomacy”, China: An International Journal, vol. 5, no. 1 (2007), pp. 26-54, https://doi.org/10.1353/chn.2007.0004.Tanev T., The Statehood, Sofia 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219747207000039
View in Google Scholar
“The Role of China as an Education Aid Donor”, UNESCO Digital Library, 2015, at https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232475.
View in Google Scholar
Welsh J.M., “The Role of the Inner Enemy in European Self-definition: Identity, Culture and International Relations Theory”, History of European Ideas, vol. 19, nos 1-3 (1994), pp. 53-61, https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(94)90197-X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-6599(94)90197-X
View in Google Scholar
Whitten G. et al., “Do Political Relations Affect International Trade? Evidence from China’s Twelve Trading Partners”, Journal of Shipping and trade, vol. 5, no. 21 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-020-00076-w. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-020-00076-w
View in Google Scholar
Wight M., Systems of States, Leicester 1977.
View in Google Scholar
Žižek S., “Beyond Discourse – Analysis”, in New Reflections of Our Time. Verso, London–New York 1990.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
