Stanowisko Niemiec wobec reformy Wspólnej Polityki Bezpieczeństwa i Obrony UE (2016-2022)

Authors

  • Krzysztof Malinowski Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Instytut Zachodni im. Zygmunta Wojciechowskiego w Poznaniu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.20.2024.88.1.11

Keywords:

CSDP, German security policy, strategic autonomy

Abstract

GERMANY’S POSITION TOWARDS THE REFORM OF THE EU’S COMMON SECURITY AND DEFENCE POLICY (2016-2022)

The aim of this article is to analyze Germany’s position towards the development of CSDP between 2016 and 2023, that is, from the enactment of the EU Global Strategy to the publication of the Strategic Compass. For the CDU/CSU-SPD (2013-2017 and 2017-2021) and SPD-Green-FDP (2021-2022) coalition governments, deepening security and defense integration was a means to advance European integration. The reasons for Germany’s increased interest in developing CSDP from 2016 onwards, regardless of the international context (Brexit, Trump’s presidency), were linked to the political elite’s growing aspirations to develop a more influential international role for Germany. However, hesitation was evident. European defense was seen as an instrument for aiding European integration and as a factor for activating the Franco-German engine. However, France – in strong contrast to Germany – saw the development of a common defense as a means to achieve strong European autonomy in the sense of independence from the US. In Germany, it was feared that this would damage the traditional relationship with NATO. Acceptance of strategic autonomy was therefore limited by the primacy of the Atlantic orientation, which was even revitalized because of the war in Ukraine. Berlin’s ambivalent position on CSDP was also due to the lack of political will to act militarily, constitutional constraints, that is, the strong role of parliament and the influence of a restrained political-military culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Krzysztof Malinowski, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu, Instytut Zachodni im. Zygmunta Wojciechowskiego w Poznaniu

    Prof. dr hab., historyk, politolog, pracownik Uniwersytetu im. Adama Mickiewicza i Instytutu Zachodniego im. Zygmunta Wojciechowskiego w Poznaniu. Główne obszary badawcze: polityka zagraniczna i bezpieczeństwa Niemiec, współczesne stosunki polsko-niemieckie. Najważniejsze publikacje: Niemiecka polityka bezpieczeństwa (1990-2005) (Poznań 2009); Polska i Niemcy w Europie. Różnice interesów – uwarunkowania i konsekwencje (Poznań 2015); redaktor monografii Polskie elity polityczne wobec stosunków z Niemcami w ramach Unii Europejskiej (Poznań 2017).

References

Becker S., Schütz T., Time for Hard Choices on Defense, „Internationale Politik Quarterly”, Winter 2022, [online] https://ip-quarterly.com/en/time-hard-choices-defense.
View in Google Scholar

Bendiek A., Die Globale Strategie für die Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik der EU, „SWP-Aktuell” 2016, nr 44.
View in Google Scholar

Besch S., PESCO: Paper Tiger, Paper Tanks?, „CER Bulletin” 2018, nr 117, December 2017/January 2018.
View in Google Scholar

Billon-Galland A., Quencez M., Can France and Germany Make PESCO Work and a Process Toward EU Defense?, „GMF Policy Brief ” 2017, nr 33.
View in Google Scholar

Bunde T., Defending European Integration by (Symbolically) Integrating European Defence? Germany and Its Ambivalent Role in European Security and Defence Policy, „Journal of European Integration” 2021, vol. 43, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1877693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1877693
View in Google Scholar

Dahl M., Germany and the Common Security and Defense Policy, „Studia Europejskie – Studies in European Affairs” 2018, vol. 4.
View in Google Scholar

Das Urteil des Bundesverfassungsgerichts zum Vertrag von Lissabon, Deutscher Bundestag, „Wissenschaftliche Dienste” , nr 54, 1 VII 2009.
View in Google Scholar

Göler D., Die aktuelle Reformdebatte der GSVP aus Sicht der strategischen Kultur Deutschlands: zwischen Kultur der Zurückhaltung und europäischem Gestaltungsanspruch, „Integration” 2019, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2019-1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2019-1-21
View in Google Scholar

Göler D., Zwischen security provider und security consultant. Veränderungen im Leitbild der strategischen Kultur der Europäischen Union, „Zeitschrift für Außen – und Sicherheitspolitik” 2014, vol. 7, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12399-014-0410-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12399-014-0410-3
View in Google Scholar

Helwig N., Germany and European Defence Cooperation. A Post-Atlantic Turn?, „FIIA Briefing Paper” 2018, nr 245.
View in Google Scholar

Huntley M., European Defence Policy at a Crossroads – Germany Preserving the Status Quo and France Seeking Change?, „European Politics and Society” 2020, vol. 23, nr 2, https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1855710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1855710
View in Google Scholar

Iso-Markku T., Germany and the EU’s Security and Defence Policy: New Role, Old Challenges, [w:] Europe’s New Political Engine. Germany’s Role in the EU’s Foreign and Security Policy, red. N. Helwig, Helsinki 2016, FIIA Report, 44.
View in Google Scholar

Iso-Markku T., Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet G., Towards German Leadership? Germany’s Evolving Role and the EU’s Common Security and Defence Policy, „German Politics” 2019, vol. 29, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2019.1611782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2019.1611782
View in Google Scholar

Janoś K., Niemcy i Wspólna Polityka Bezpieczeństwa i Obrony Unii Europejskiej, [w:] Interesy – wartości – kompromisy. Polityka zagraniczna Niemiec w erze Angeli Merkel, red. K. Janoś i in., Poznań 2022, Studium Niemcoznawcze, 99.
View in Google Scholar

Jopp M., Schubert J., Level-II-GSVP: neue Dynamik durch intergouvernementale Integration?, „Integration” 2019, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2019-1-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2019-1-37
View in Google Scholar

Kaim M., Kempin R., Kompass oder Windspiel? Eine Analyse des Entwurfs für den „Strategischen Kompass” der EU, „SWP-Aktuell” 2022, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.18449/2022A01.
View in Google Scholar

Kaim M., Kempin R., Kooperation ohne strategischen Überbau? Rahmenbedingungen der deutsch-französischen Verteidigungspolitik, „Integration” 2018, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2018-1-49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/0720-5120-2018-1-49
View in Google Scholar

Kempin R., Ondarza N. von, Die GSVP vor der Erosion? Die Notwendigkeit einer Wiederbindung Frankreichs und Großbritannien, „SWP-Aktuell” 2011, nr 25
View in Google Scholar

Major C., Mölling Ch., Deutschland, [w:] Strategische Autonomie und die Verteidigung Europas. Auf dem Weg zur Europäischen Armee?, red. H.-P. Bartels, A.M. Kellner, U. Optenhögel, Marburg 2017.
View in Google Scholar

Major C., Ein zivil-militärisches Hauptquartier für die EU. Die Initiative des Weimarer Dreiecks belebt die laufende Debatte, „SWP-Aktuell” 2010, nr 74.
View in Google Scholar

Malinowski K., Orientacja transatlantycka w Niemczech w obliczu nowego otwarcia w stosunkach niemiecko-amerykańskich, „Przegląd Zachodni” 2021, nr 1.
View in Google Scholar

Martil B., Gebhard C., Combined Differentiation in European Defense: Tailoring Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) to Strategic and Political Complexity, „Contemporary Security Policy” 2023, vol. 44, nr 1, https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2155360. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2022.2155360
View in Google Scholar

Miszczak K., Niemcy w polityce globalnej (Biała Księga), „Rocznik Polsko-Niemiecki” 2017, nr 25, z. 1, https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2017.25.01. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35757/RPN.2017.25.01
View in Google Scholar

Miszczak K., Przyszłość polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony Unii Europejskiej, „Krakowskie Studia Międzynarodowe” 2017, vol. 14, nr 1.
View in Google Scholar

Mölling Ch., Pooling und Sharing in EU und Nato, „SWP-Aktuell” 2012, nr 25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845241401-361
View in Google Scholar

Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet G., Deutsche Prioritäten für Europas Außen-, Sicherheits- und Verteidigungspolitik, [w:] Handbuch zur deutschen Europapolitik, red. K. Böttger, M. Jopp, Baden-Baden 2017, https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845274126-376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/9783845274126-376
View in Google Scholar

Müller-Brandeck-Bocquet G., Germany and the European Union. How Chancellor Merkel Shaped Europe, Cham 2022, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10627-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10627-9
View in Google Scholar

Vogel D., Schulz R., Zur Diskussion über eine 28. Armee für die Europäische Union, „SWPAktuell” 2020, nr 19.
View in Google Scholar

Węc J.J., Proces implementacji traktatu lizbońskiego w latach 2009-2014, „Politeja” 2015, vol. 12, nr 3(35), https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.35.24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.35.24
View in Google Scholar

Węc J.J., Perspektywy reformy Wspólnej Polityki Bezpieczeństwa i Obrony Unii Europejskiej do 2025 roku, „Politeja” 2022, vol. 19, nr 3(78), https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.19.2022.78.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.19.2022.78.12
View in Google Scholar

Zandee D., Stoetman A., Realising the EU Rapid Deployment Policy Brief Capacity: Opportunities and Pitfalls, „Clingendael Policy Brief ” 2022, October.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

01-07-2024

Issue

Section

Część 2. Reforma wspólnej polityki bezpieczeństwa i obrony UE (2016-2023)

How to Cite

“Stanowisko Niemiec Wobec Reformy Wspólnej Polityki Bezpieczeństwa I Obrony UE (2016-2022)”. 2024. Politeja 21 (1(88/1): 175-204. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.20.2024.88.1.11.