Wdrażanie koncepcji Mission Command i Versatile Leadership w kontekście kulturowych wymiarów zaprogramowania umysłowego

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.88.3.15

Keywords:

commanding, leadership, chaos

Abstract

INTRODUCING OF THE MISSION COMMAND AND VERSATILE LEADERSHIP CONCEPTS IN THE CONTEXT OF CULTURAL DIMENSIONS OF MIND PROGRAMMING

The concepts of Mission Command and Versatile Leadership are very similar in many ways, regardless the fact that they develop in ‘parallel’ realities – military and civilian. Both concepts require the use of a culture dependent methods of introducing into the military or civilian organisations. The cultural dimension of mind programming creates the set of specific conditions for introducing the MC and VL – some of those aspects can be positive and some negative toward those two concepts. But without researching and without awareness of those conditions there will be a lot of chaos and misinterpretations in the organisations where MC and VL concepts appear.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Maciej Milczanowski, University of Rzeszów

    Doktor habilitowany, profesor Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, kapitan rezerwy, uczestnik operacji wojskowych. Historyk, politolog, absolwent AON i UJ. Obecnie pracuje nad problemem przywództwa i strategii, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem koncepcji wojskowej Mission Command. Autor książek i artykułów naukowych oraz wielu tekstów popularnych, a także bloga StratLider. Artykuł powstał w ramach projektu Regionalna Inicjatywa Doskonałości – „Migranci z Ukrainy w województwie podkarpackim. Implikacje społeczno-gospodarcze”.

References

Allen V.L., Levine J.M., Consensus and Conformity, „Journal of Experimental Social Psychology” 1969, vol. 5, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(69)90032-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(69)90032-8
View in Google Scholar

Army Doctrine Reference Publication 6-0 Mission Command, Headquaters Department of the Army, Washington D.C., 17 V 2012.
View in Google Scholar

Asch S., Social Psychology, New York 1952, https://doi.org/10.1037/10025-000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10025-000
View in Google Scholar

Berne E., W co grają ludzie. Psychologie stosunków międzyludzkich, wyd. V, Warszawa 2015.
View in Google Scholar

Chełpa S., Witkowski T., Psychologia konfliktów, Wrocław 2015.
View in Google Scholar

Collins J., Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap… and Others Don’t, Boulder 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24260/alalbab.v1i1.18
View in Google Scholar

Kim D., Starks L.T., Gender Diversity on Corporate Boards: Do Women Contribute Unique Skills?, „American Economic Review”, vol. 106, no. 5, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20161032
View in Google Scholar

Dowodzenie i kierowanie w działaniach lądowych DT-3.2.2 (B), Dowództwo Generalne Rodzaju Sił Zbrojnych, Bydgoszcz 2018.
View in Google Scholar

Niepokój psychiczny, Encyklopedia PWN, [online] https://encyklopedia.pwn.pl/haslo/niepokoj-psychiczny;3947472.html.
View in Google Scholar

Forlicz S., Informacja w biznesie, Warszawa 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Galula D., Counterinsurgency Warfare: Theory and Practice, Westport 1964.
View in Google Scholar

Goleman D., Inteligencja emocjonalna, Poznań 1997.
View in Google Scholar

Hanayama A., Mor K., Conformity of Six-Year-Old Children in the Asch Experiment without Using Confederates, „Psychology” 2011, vol. 2, no. 7, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2011.27100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2011.27100
View in Google Scholar

Harvey J.B., The Abilene Paradox and Other Meditations on Management, San Francisco 1996.
View in Google Scholar

Hersh E., Why Diversity Matters: Women on Boards of Directors, 21 VII 2016, [online] https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/ecpe/why-diversity-matters-women-on-boards-of-directors/.
View in Google Scholar

Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Kultury i organizacje. Zaprogramowanie umysłu, Warszawa 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Jacko J.F., Typy i funkcje autorytetu w „czasach nieufności”, [w:] Komunikacja marketingowa w czasach nieufności, red. G.P. Maj, Radom 2007.
View in Google Scholar

Kaplan B., Kaiser R., The Versatile Leader: Make the Most of Your Strengths Without Overdoing It, San Francisco 2006.
View in Google Scholar

Krulak C.C., The Strategic Corporal: Leadership in the Three Block War, „Marines Magazine” 1999, no. 1, https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA399413. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA399413
View in Google Scholar

Lorenz E.N., A Study of the Predictability of a 28-Variable Atmospheric Model, „Tellus” 1965, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1965.tb01424.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1965.tb01424.x
View in Google Scholar

Mattis J., Hoffman F., Future Warfare: The Rise of Hybrid Wars, „US Naval Institute Proceedings Magazine” 2005, vol. 131/11/1,233.
View in Google Scholar

Milczanowski M., Sztuka budowania pokoju. Przywództwo strategiczne na przykładzie fazy IV operacji Iracka Wolność, Rzeszów 2020.
View in Google Scholar

Milczanowski M., Wdrażanie koncepcji Mission Command w warunkach polskich – problemy pojęciowe, „Polityka i Społeczeństwo” 2023, t. 21, nr 4, https://doi.org/10.15584/polispol.2023.4.18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15584/polispol.2023.4.18
View in Google Scholar

Milgram S., Behavioral Study of Obedience, „The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology” 1963, vol. 64, no. 4, https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040525
View in Google Scholar

Milgram S., Obedience to Authority, New York 1974.
View in Google Scholar

Moscovici S., Faucheux C., Social Influence, Conformity Bias, and the Study Ofactive Minorities, [w:] Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, red. L. Berkowitz, t. 6, New York 1972, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60027-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60027-1
View in Google Scholar

Moscovici S., Social Influence and Social Change, New York 1976.
View in Google Scholar

Moscovici S., Toward a Theory of Coiwersion Behavior, [w:] Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, red. L. Berkovitz, t. 13, New York 1980, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60133-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60133-1
View in Google Scholar

Mission Command is a Philosophy of Command, with Centralised Intent and Decentralised Execution, that is Particularly Suitable for Complex, Dynamic and Adversarial Situations, „Army Doctrine Publication Operations”, Bicester 2011.
View in Google Scholar

Murray K., Język liderów, Warszawa 2014.
View in Google Scholar

Santorski J., Meta skrypt lidera, Warszawa 2014.
View in Google Scholar

Santorski J., Milczanowski M., Jak w wojsku – „Mission Command” w służbie cywilnej, „Coaching” 2017, no. 2.
View in Google Scholar

Schermerhorn J.R., Zarządzanie. Kluczowe koncepcje, Warszawa 2008.
View in Google Scholar

Schreiber H., Świadomość międzykulturowa – „odświeżony” paradygmat prowadzenia operacji wojskowych, [w:] B. Janusz-Pawletta, Konwencje Genewskie 60 lat później, Warszawa 2010.
View in Google Scholar

Stewart I., Czy Bóg gra w kości? Nowa matematyka chaosu, Warszawa 1994.
View in Google Scholar

Tempczyk M., Teoria chaosu a filozofia, Warszawa 1998.
View in Google Scholar

The Culture Factor, Country Comparision Tool, [online] https://www.hofstede-insights.com/country-comparison-tool, 29 XII 2023.
View in Google Scholar

Zimbardo P.G., Paradoks czasu, Warszawa 2017.
View in Google Scholar

Zimbardo P.G., Psychologia i życie, Warszawa 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

06-12-2024

Issue

Vol. 21 No. 1(88/3) (2024): Society, Culture, Migration

Section

Dilemmas of European societies

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

“Wdrażanie Koncepcji Mission Command I Versatile Leadership W Kontekście Kulturowych Wymiarów Zaprogramowania Umysłowego”. 2024. Politeja 21 (1(88/3): 229-45. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.88.3.15.