Suwerenność technologiczna - teoretyczna i analityczna konceptualizacja pojęcia w obszarze badań społecznych
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.90.11Keywords:
technological sovereignty, strategic autonomy, international security, sovereignty theory, geo-economics, technological conflictsAbstract
TECHNOLOGICAL SOVEREIGNTY – THEORETICAL AND ANALYTICAL CONCEPTUALIZATION OF THE CONCEPT IN THE FIELD OF SOCIAL RESEARCH
The purpose of the article is to adapt the concept of technological sovereignty to the Polish scientific discourse with the postulate of expanding research in this area. This article is an effort to implement the concept and improve the perception of the policy of technological sovereignty into the properties of the cognitive category of security science and political science. Under this premise, the theoretical and analytical designators extracted in the course of analysis allow the construction of a research operative. The article attempts to provide a theoretical and cognitive account of technological sovereignty in the context of the geo-economic paradigm and the concept of technological warfare.
Downloads
References
Apanowicz J., Metodologia ogólna, Gdynia 2002.
View in Google Scholar
Babbie E., Badania społeczne w praktyce, przeł. W. Betkiewicz, M. Bucholc, P. Gadomski, Warszawa 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Bäcker R. i in., Metodologia badań politologicznych, Warszawa 2016.
View in Google Scholar
Baran M., Struktura procesu badawczego, [w:] Metody badań ilościowych w zarządzaniu, red. Ł. Sułkowski, R. Lenart-Gansiciec, K. Kolasińska-Morawska, Łódź 2021.
View in Google Scholar
Barrinha A., Christou G., Speaking Sovereignty: the EU in the Cyber Domain, „European Security” 2022, vol. 31(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2102895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2102895
View in Google Scholar
Beaucillon Ch., Poli S., EU Strategic Autonomy and Technological Sovereignty, „European Papers” 2023, vol. 8(2).
View in Google Scholar
Bellanova R., Carrapico H., Duez D., Digital/Sovereignty and European Security Integration: An Introduction, „European Security” 2022, vol. 31(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2101887. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2101887
View in Google Scholar
Calzada I., Technological Sovereignty: Protecting Citizens’ Digital Rights in the AI-Driven and Post-GDPR Algorithmic and City-Regional European Realm Regional Studies, „Regions eZine” 2019, vol. 4, [online:] https://regions.regionalstudies.org/ezine/article/technologicalsovereignty-protecting-citizens-digital-rights-in-the-ai-driven-and-post-gdpr-algorithmicand-city-regional-european-realm/?doi=10.1080/13673882.2018.00001038. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13673882.2018.00001038
View in Google Scholar
Chomsky N., Crisis and Hope: Theirs and Ours, [w:] The Global Industrial Complex: Systems of Domination, red. S. Best, R. Kahn, A.J. Nocella II, P. McLaren, Plymouth 2011.
View in Google Scholar
Chrétien J., Drouard E., Buffet G., Castex L., Dechoux A. i in., European Technological Sovereignty. Research Report, Think tank Renaissance Numérique 2022.
View in Google Scholar
Cooper R., Pękanie granic. Porządek i chaos w XXI wieku, przeł. P. Kłossowicz, Poznań 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Crespi F., Caravella S., Menghini M., Salvatori Ch., European Technological Sovereignty: An Emerging Framework for Policy Strategy, „Industrial Policy” 2021, nr 56(6), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-021-1013-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-021-1013-6
View in Google Scholar
Csernatoni R., The EU’s Hegemonic Imaginaries: From European Strategic Autonomy in Defence to Technological Sovereignty, „European Security” 2022, vol. 31(3), https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2103370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2103370
View in Google Scholar
Dementiev V.E., Technological Sovereignty and Priorities of Localization of Production, „Terra Economicus” 2023, vol. 21(1), https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-1-6-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-1-6-18
View in Google Scholar
Diesen G., Great Power Politics in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The Geoeconomics of Technological Sovereignty, London 2021, https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755607037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755607037
View in Google Scholar
Dyduch W., Ilościowe badanie i operacjonalizacja zjawisk w naukach o zarządzaniu, [w:] Podstawy metodologii w naukach o zarządzaniu, red. W. Czakon, Warszawa 2015.
View in Google Scholar
Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T., Technology Sovereignty as an Emerging Frame for Innovation Policy. Defining Rationales, Ends and Means, „Research Policy” 2023, nr 52(6), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2023.104765
View in Google Scholar
Fägersten B., Lovcalic U., Lundborg Regnér A., Vashishtha S., Controlling Critical Technology in an Age of Geoeconomics: Actors, Tools, and Scenarios, Swedish Institute of International Affairs, UI Report 2023, no. 1.
View in Google Scholar
Hernández Fuentes A.P., Cooperación digital y soberanía tecnológica para cerrar la brecha digital
View in Google Scholar
en la cuarta revolución industrial, „Oasis” 2022, vol. 36, https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n36.06. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18601/16577558.n36.06
View in Google Scholar
Verde Garrido M., „All Your Internet Are Belong to Us”: On Nation States’ Claims of Sovereignty over ICT Architecture and Contents, „Berlin Forum on Global Politics” 2016.
View in Google Scholar
Haliżak E., Geneza geoekonomii – ideowe i materialne przesłanki, [w:] Geoekonomia, red. E. Haliżak, Warszawa 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Haliżak E., O istocie geoekonomicznego działania, [w:] Geoekonomia, red. E. Haliżak, Warszawa 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Haliżak E., Pojęcie i istota przestrzeni geoekonomicznej, [w:] Geoekonomia, red. E. Haliżak, Warszawa 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Haliżak E., Wstęp, [w:] Geoekonomia, red. E. Haliżak, Warszawa 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Helwig N., Wigell M., The EU’s Quest for Geoeconomic Power Pursuing Open Strategic Autonomy, „FIIA” 2022, vol. 334.
View in Google Scholar
González Hernández W., Hernández Revilla D.O., González Castillo J.M., Migration Towards Free Software in the Training of Computer Teachers as a Strategy of Technological Sovereignty, „Eccos – Revista Científica” 2021, nr 58.
View in Google Scholar
Heyen N., Friedewald M., Jochem E., Reiß T., Thielmann A., Assessing Technological Innovations: From Early Warning to the Governance of Socio-Technical Transformations, Karlsruhe 2022.
View in Google Scholar
Illgner K., Technological Sovereignty: Methodology and Recommendations, „VDE Position Paper” 2021.
View in Google Scholar
Ilves L., Osula A.M., The Technological Sovereignty Dilemma – and How New Technology Can Offer a Way Out, „European Cybersecurity Journal” 2020, vol. 6(1).
View in Google Scholar
Jančárková T., Sovereignty as a Factor in Securing, Securitizing, and Fragmenting Cyberspace, „Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze” 2023, nr 2(59), https://doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2023.2.09. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26881/gsp.2023.2.09
View in Google Scholar
Jean C., Geopolityka, przeł. T. Orłowski, J. Pawłowska, Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków 2003.
View in Google Scholar
Keating M., Jordana J., Marx A., Wouters J., States, Sovereignty, Borders and Self-Determination in Europe, [w:] Changing Borders in Europe: Exploring the Dynamics of Integration, Differentiation and Self-Determination in the European Union, red. J. Jordana, M. Keating, A. Marx, J. Wouters, London 2019, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492044
View in Google Scholar
Key Enabling Technologies for Europe’s Technological Sovereignty, European Parliamentary Research Service. Scientific Foresight Unit (STOA), XII 2012.
View in Google Scholar
Klimas P., Skale pomiaru: konstrukcja i walidacja skal nowych versus weryfikacja i adaptacja skal replikowanych, [w:] Metody badań ilościowych w zarządzaniu, red. Ł. Sułkowski, Łódź 2021.
View in Google Scholar
Kolasińska-Morawska K., Operacjonalizacja zmiennych, [w:] Metody badań ilościowych w zarządzaniu, red. Ł. Sułkowski, Łódź 2021.
View in Google Scholar
Lewandowski P., Gębska M., Geoeconomic Leaders among the Three Seas Initiative Countries.
View in Google Scholar
Part 1: Geoeconomics as a Paradigm for Research on International Security, „European Research Studies Journal” 2021, vol. 24, https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/2618
View in Google Scholar
Lewandowski P., Ład międzynarodowy jako przedmiot poznania w naukach o bezpieczeństwie, „Wiedza Obronna” 2023, nr 284(3).
View in Google Scholar
Luttwak E.N., From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics. Logic of Conflict. Grammar of Commerce, „The National Interest” 1990/1991, no. 20.
View in Google Scholar
Luttwak E.N., Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace, Cambridge 2021.
View in Google Scholar
Luttwak E.N., The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone, Oxford 2002.
View in Google Scholar
Luttwak E.N., Turbokapitalizm. Zwycięzcy i przegrani światowej gospodarki, przeł. E. Kania, Wrocław 2000.
View in Google Scholar
March Ch., Schieferdecker I., Technological Sovereignty as Ability, Not Autarky, „International Studies Review” 2023, vol. 25(2), https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viad012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viad012
View in Google Scholar
Maurer T., Morgus R., Skierka I., Hohmann M., Technological Sovereignty: Missing the Point?, [w:] 2015 7th International Conference on Cyber Conflict: Architectures in Cyberspace, Tallinn 2015, https://doi.org/10.1109/CYCON.2015.7158468. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CYCON.2015.7158468
View in Google Scholar
Michalski K., Jurgilewicz M., Konflikty technologiczne. Nowa architektura zagrożeń w epoce wielkich wyzwań, Warszawa 2021.
View in Google Scholar
Moerel L., Timmers P., Reflections on Digital Sovereignty, „Research in Focus” 2021.
View in Google Scholar
Nye J.S., Soft power. Jak osiągnąć sukces w polityce światowej, przeł. J. Zaborowski, Warszawa 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Pilch P., Problemy konceptualizacji i operacjonalizacji pojęcia sukcesu zawodowego, [w:] Metody i techniki zarządzania. Inspiracje dla teorii i praktyki, red. M. Kołodziejczak, I. Bednarska-Wnuk, I. Świątek-Barylska, Łódź 2020, https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-435-3.11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-435-3.11
View in Google Scholar
Pioch M., Technological Sovereignty, Industrial Resilience and European Competences, ZVEI, X 2020, [online] https://www.zvei.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Presse_und_Medien/Publikationen/ 2020/Oktober/Technologische_Souveraenitaet__Resilienz_der_Industrie_und_europaeische_Kompetenzen/Technological-Sovereignty-Industrial-Resilience-and-European-Competences-Discussion-Paper.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Shaping Europe’s Digital Future, European Commision, Luxembourg 2020, [online] https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2020-02/communication-shaping-europes-digital-future-feb2020_en_4.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Skarbek W.W., Wybrane zagadnienia metodologii nauk społecznych, Piotrków Trybunalski 2013.
View in Google Scholar
Stańczyk J., Konceptualizacja kategorii bezpieczeństwa w perspektywie wzrostu znaczenia tożsamości kulturowych, „Bezpieczeństwo. Teoria i Praktyka” 2009, nr 3-4.
View in Google Scholar
Statement on Technological Sovereignty, [w:] Statement to accompany the launch of the full EIC, 18 III 2021, [online] https://eic.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2021-03/EIC%20Advisory%20Board%20statement%20at%20launch%20of%20EIC_1.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Wallerstein I., Analiza systemów-światów. Wprowadzenie, przeł. K. Gawlicz, M. Starnawski, Warszawa 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Yergin D., Nowa mapa. Jak energetyka zmienia geopolitykę, przeł. P. Cichawa, Warszawa 2021.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
