Populizm – niejednoznaczny fenomen

Zestawienie perspektyw teoretycznych

Authors

  • Joanna Cichecka Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.15.2018.55.01

Keywords:

populism, neopopulism, neopluralism, delegative democracy, Latin America

Abstract

Populism – an Undefinable Phenomenon: Record of Theoretical Perspectives
The article is a summary of the most popular concepts of populism – presented both from the historical and contemporary perspective. The author pays attention to controversies of the mere concept of populism, which are still present in modern social sciences. A starting point of the analysis are XIX century agrarian populism and types of populism. The example of both the variety of the mere phenomenon and diversity of theoretical perspectives engaged by the scientists to clarify the concept are social changes in Latin America in the 80s and 90s.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Joanna Cichecka, Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków

    absolwentka polonistyki i socjologii oraz doktorantka w Katedrze Filozofii Polityki w Instytucie Nauk Politycznych i Stosunków Międzynarodowych UJ.

References

Canovan M., Populism, London 1981.
View in Google Scholar

Di Tella T., Populism and Reform in Latin America, [w:] Obstacles to Change in Latin America, red. C. Véliz, London 1965.
View in Google Scholar

Dix R.H., Populism: Authoritarian and Democratic, „Latin American Research Review” 1985, vol. 20, nr 2.
View in Google Scholar

Ellner S., The Contrasting Variants of the Populism of Hugo Chávez and Alberto Fujimori, „Journal of Latin American Studies” 2003, vol. 35, nr 1, [online] https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X02006685. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X02006685
View in Google Scholar

Ellner S., The Heyday of Radical Populism in Venezuela and Its Aftermath, [w:] Populism in Latin America, red. M.L. Conniff, Tuscaloosa 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Ellner S., Hugo Chávez y Alberto Fujimori: Análisis comparativo de dos variantes de populismo, „Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales” 2004, vol. 10, nr 1.
View in Google Scholar

Frei R., Kaltwasser C.R., El populismo como experimento político: historia y teoría política de una ambivalencia, „Revista de Sociología” 2008, nr 22, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.5354/0719‑529X.2008.14485.
View in Google Scholar

Huntington S.P., The Third Wave. Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman 1991, Julian J. Rothbaum Distinguished Lecture Series.
View in Google Scholar

Jansen R.S., Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism, „Sociological Theory” 2011, vol. 29, nr 2, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‑9558.2011.01388.x.
View in Google Scholar

Kenney Ch.D., Fujimori’s Coup and the Breakdown of Democracy in Latin America, Notre Dame 2004.
View in Google Scholar

Kitching G., Development and Underdevelopment in Historical Perspective. Populism, Nationalism and Industrialization, London–New York 1989, Development and Underdevelopment. Open University Set Book.
View in Google Scholar

Kitschelt H., Popular Dissatisfaction with Democracy. Populism and Party Systems, [w:] Democracies and the Populist Challenge, red. Y. Mény, Y. Surel, New York 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403920072_10
View in Google Scholar

Laclau E., Rozum populistyczny, red. T. Szkudlarek, przeł. A. Alchimowicz i in., Wrocław 2009, Biblioteka Współczesnej Myśli Społecznej, 16.
View in Google Scholar

Marczewska‑Rytko M., Demokracja bezpośrednia w teorii i praktyce politycznej, Lublin 2001.
View in Google Scholar

Marczewska‑Rytko M., Populizm. Teoria i praktyka polityczna, Lublin 1995.
View in Google Scholar

O’Donnell G.A., Delegative Democracy, „Journal of Democracy” 1994, vol. 5, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1994.0010
View in Google Scholar

Oxhorn P.D., Is the Century of Corporatism Over? Neoliberalism and the Rise of Neopluralism, [w:] What Kind of Democracy? What Kind of Market? Latin America in the Age of Neoliberalism, red. P.D. Oxhorn, G. Ducatenzeiler, University Park (Pa.) 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/j.ctv14gpfhw
View in Google Scholar

Populism in Latin America, red. M.L. Conniff, Tuscaloosa 1999.
View in Google Scholar

Populizm, [w:] Encyklopedia socjologii, t. 3, Warszawa 2000.
View in Google Scholar

Quintero R., El mito del populismo en el Ecuador. Análisis de los fundamentos del estado ecuatoriano moderno (1895‑1934), Quito 1980.
View in Google Scholar

Roberts K.M., Neoliberalism and the Transformation of Populism in Latin America. The Peruvian Case, „World Politics” 1995, vol. 48, nr 1, [online] https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1995.0004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1995.0004
View in Google Scholar

Roxborough I., Unity and Diversity in Latin American History, „Journal of Latin American Studies” 1984, vol. 16, nr 1, [online] https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00004016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X00004016
View in Google Scholar

Szacki J., Pytania o populizm, „Krytyka Polityczna” 2003, nr 4.
View in Google Scholar

Torre C. de la, The Ambiguous Meanings of Latin American Populisms, „Social Research” 1992, vol. 59, nr 2.
View in Google Scholar

Torre C. de la, Populist Seduction in Latin America. The Ecuadorian Experience, Athens (OH) 2000, Research in International Studies. Latin America Series, 32.
View in Google Scholar

Vilas C.M., El populismo latinoamericano: un enfoque estructural, „Desarrollo Económico” 1988, vol. 28, nr 111, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3466951. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3466951
View in Google Scholar

Walicki A., Russia, [w:] Populism. Its Meanings and National Characteristics, red. G. Ionescu, E. Gellner, London 1969.
View in Google Scholar

Weyland K., Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics, „Comparative Politics” 2001, vol. 34, nr 1, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/422412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422412
View in Google Scholar

Weyland K., Neoliberal Populism in Latin America and Eastern Europe, „Comparative Politics” 1999, vol. 31, nr 4, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/422236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/422236
View in Google Scholar

Weyland K., Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: How Much Affinity, „Third World Quarterly” 2003, vol. 24, nr 6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590310001630080
View in Google Scholar

Weyland K., Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: Unexpected Affinities, „Studies in Comparative International Development” 1996, vol. 31, nr 3, [online] http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02738987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02738987
View in Google Scholar

Weyland K., Swallowing the Bitter Pill: Sources of Popular Support for Neoliberal Reform in Latin America, „Comparative Political Studies” 1998, vol. 31, nr 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414098031005001
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

22-06-2018

Issue

Vol. 15 No. 4(55) (2018)

Section

Myśl polityczna

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Joanna Cichecka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

“Populizm – Niejednoznaczny Fenomen: Zestawienie Perspektyw Teoretycznych”. 2018. Politeja 15 (4(55): 5-19. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.15.2018.55.01.