Nowa wojna, stara metoda. Koncepcje wykorzystania operacji peace-keeping jako instrumentu rozwiązywania rosyjsko-ukraińskiego konfliktu zbrojnego
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.93.03Słowa kluczowe:
operacja peace-keeping, Organizacja Narodów Zjednoczonych, polityka bezpieczeństwa, linia demarkacyjna, wojna rosyjsko-ukraińska, Rosja, Donbas, Ukraina, rozstrzygnięcie konfliktu zbrojnego, operacje reagowania kryzysowego, Porozumienia Mińskie, Unia EuropejskaAbstrakt
NEW WAR, OLD METHOD: CONCEPTS OF USING PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR THE RUSSIAN-UKRAINIAN ARMED CONFLICT SETTLEMENT
The aim of this article is to present concepts for resolving the Russian-Ukrainian armed conflict based on the classic crisis response mechanism of a peacekeeping operation. Proposals for establishing such an operation—both in its traditional and expanded form—were developed in various variants between 2015 and 2018, suggesting the involvement of contingents from the European Union, the United Nations, or Multinational Forces. These ideas emerged as a direct response to the stalemate in implementing provisions of the Minsk Agreements. During the first phase of the Russian-Ukrainian war, experts pointed out the high adaptability of peacekeeping mechanisms to the conditions of modern armed conflicts, particularly hybrid warfare. This adaptability included expanding the mission’s policing and civilian capabilities. Such reflections resulted in numerous analytical and state-sponsored concepts for implementing a peacekeeping operation. However, these efforts were ultimately unsuccessful due to Moscow’s position. The final part of the article analyzes the reasons behind this failure and explores the capabilities of peacekeeping operations as an instrument for overcoming the conflict—particularly in a scenario where active military operations in Ukraine come to an end. In this context, the article outlines the preconditions for resuming discussions on deploying such a mission, assessed through the lens of ripeness theory and the concept of hurting stalemate.
Pobrania
Bibliografia
Croatian Peacekeeping Model Best for Donbas – Ukraine’s Ministry for Occupied Areas, UNIAN, 23 X 2018, [online] https://www.unian.info/politics/10309443-croatian-peacekeeping-model-best-for-donbas-ukraine-s-ministry-for-occupied-areas.html.
View in Google Scholar
Domagała-Pereira K., Niemcy z dystansem o misji pokojowej UE na Ukrainie, 20 II 2015, [online] https://www.dw.com/pl/niemcy-z-dystansem-o-misji-pokojowej-ue-na-ukrainie/a-18271033.
View in Google Scholar
Dyner A.M., Szeligowski D., Perspektywy misji pokojowej ONZ w Donbasie, „Biuletyn PISM” 2017, no. 94, 5 X, 2017, [online] https://www.pism.pl/publikacje/Perspektywy_misji_pokojowej_ONZ_w_Donbasie.
View in Google Scholar
Dziewulska A., Sztuka rozwiązywania konfliktu zbrojnego, Warszawa 2007.
View in Google Scholar
Gabriel stellt die deutsche Russlandpolitik infrage, „Neue Zürcher Zeitung”, 8 IX 2017, [online]
View in Google Scholar
https://www.nzz.ch/international/aussenpolitik-im-bundestagswahlkampf-gabriel-stellt-die-deutsche-russlandpolitik-infrage-ld.1314956. Gowan R., Can the United Nations United Ukraine? Raport, Hudson Institute, Washington 2018.
View in Google Scholar
Kardaś S., Konończuk W., Mińsk 2 – kruchy rozejm zamiast trwałego pokoju, OSW, 12 II 2015, [online] https://www.osw.waw.pl/pl/publikacje/analizy/2015-02-12/minsk-2-kruchy-rozejmzamiast-trwalego-pokoju.
View in Google Scholar
Kortunov A., Will Donbass Live to See the UN Peacekeepers?, Russian International Affairs Council, 11 XII 2017, [online] https://russiancouncil.ru/en/analytics-and-comments/analytics/will-donbass-live-to-see-the-un-peacekeepers/.
View in Google Scholar
Freedman L., Ukraine and the Art of Exhaustion, „Survival: Global Politics and Strategy” 2015, no. 57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2015.1090132
View in Google Scholar
Łomanowski A., Wojna Rosji z Ukrainą. Druga rocznica inwazji niewidoczna na froncie. Kiedy przełom?, „Rzeczpospolita”, 2024, 25 II, [online] https://www.rp.pl/konflikty-zbrojne/art39-899951-wojna-rosji-z-ukraina-druga-rocznica-inwazji-niwidoczna-na-foncie-kiedy-przelom.
View in Google Scholar
Malyarenko T., Peacekeeping in Ukraine’s Donbas: Opportunities and Risks, Institutio per gli Studi di Politica Internazionale, 26 X 2021, [online] https://www.ispionline.it/en/publication/why-un-peacekeeping-mission-ukraine-doomed-fail-32116.
View in Google Scholar
Melnyk O., Umland A., Why and How a Combined UN/EU Peacekeeping Mission Could Disentangle the Donbas Conundrumd, Global IndraStra, 16 IV 2016, [online] https://www.indrastra.com/2016/04/OPINION-Why-and-How-Combined-UN-EU-Peacekeeping-Mission-Disentangle-the-Donbas-Conundrum-002-04-2016-0042.html.
View in Google Scholar
Miller Ch., Explainer: What Is the Steinmeier Formula and Did Zelenskiy Just Capitulate to Moscow?, 2 X 2019, [online] https://www.rferl.org/a/what-is-the-steinmeier-formula-and-didzelenskiy-just-capitulate-to-moscow-/30195593.html.
View in Google Scholar
Norman L., Barnes J.E., U.S. to Seek Russian Approval for Peacekeepers in Eastern Ukraine, 9 XI 2017, [online] https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-to-seek-russian-approval-for-peace keepers-in-eastern-ukraine-1510258304.
View in Google Scholar
Putin Says UN Peacekeepers Could Be Deployed Throughout Ukraine Conflict Zone, Radio Free Europe, 11 IX 2017, [online] https://www.rferl.org./a/ukraine-putin-un-peacekeepersmerkel-border-osce/28729481.html.
View in Google Scholar
Raport: misja pokojowa ONZ na Ukrainie musiałaby liczyć 20 tys. żołnierzy, Dziennik. Gazeta Prawna, 12 II 2018, [online] https://www.gazetaprawna.pl/wiadomosci/artykuly/110-3811,raport-misja-pokojowa-onz-na-ukrainie-musialaby-liczyc-20-tys-zolnierzy.html.
View in Google Scholar
Rasmussen and Vershbow: The UN Should Test Russian Sincerity for a Donbas Peacekeeping Force, Rasmussen Global, 18 IX 2017, [online] https://rasmussenglobal.com/rasmussen-andvershbow-the-un-should-test-russian-sincerity-for-a-donbas-peacekeeping-force/.
View in Google Scholar
Pobrania
Opublikowane
Numer
Dział
Licencja

Utwór dostępny jest na licencji Creative Commons Uznanie autorstwa – Użycie niekomercyjne – Bez utworów zależnych 4.0 Międzynarodowe.
