Did COP26 Lapse or Not Lapse the Core Objective of the UNFCCC Under the Paris Agreement-carbon markets?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.21.2024.92.10Keywords:
climate change, COP26, carbon marke, UNFCCC, negotiationsAbstract
It is widely believed that there is academic literature addressing the United Nations Climate Summit, but there is no systematic review and analysis of research on COP26 and its objectives under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. This article describes a qualitative meta-synthesis of research on COP26 that examines the extent to which evidence exists for changes in reducing greenhouse gases as a core objective of the UNFCCC. A systematic analysis and synthesis of various studies have shown that Article 6.2 (not lapsed) has undergone a significant change in relation to the core objective of the UNFCCC under the market-based approach. Several studies have found that Article 6.4 (lapsed) has hardly changed under a marketbased approach. The results for Article 6.8 under non-market-based approaches (lapsed) were similar, although COP26 did not have the opportunity to provide “Just Change Evidence”. The article concludes by identifying gaps in scientific research and suggesting additional scientific work to increase the availability of evidence for non-market approaches.
Downloads
References
Aktar M., Alam M., Al-Amin A., “Global Economic Crisis, Energy Use, CO2 Emissions, and Policy Roadmap Amid COVID-19,” Sustainable Production and Consumption, vol. 26 (2021), pp. 770-781, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.12.029
View in Google Scholar
Aldy J., Stavins R., “Climate Negotiators Create an Opportunity for Scholars,” Science, vol. 337, no. 6098 (2012), pp. 1043-1044, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223836
View in Google Scholar
Andresen S., “The Paris Agreement and Its Rulebook in a Problem-Solving Perspective,” Climate Law, vol. 9, no. 1-2 (2019), pp. 122-136, https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-00901007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18786561-00901007
View in Google Scholar
Annette L., “COP26: Reflections on the Power of Science as a Force Against Climate Change,” Impact, no. 1 (2022), pp. 4-5, https://doi.org/10.21820/23987073.2022.1.4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21820/23987073.2022.1.4
View in Google Scholar
Arora N.K., Mishra I., “COP26: More Challenges than Achievements,” Environmental Sustainability, vol. 4 (2021), pp. 585-588, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-021-00212-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-021-00212-7
View in Google Scholar
“Article 6: What is it and why is it Important?,” International Chamber of Commerce, 18 July 2019, at https://iccwbo.org/media-wall/news-speeches/article-6-important/.
View in Google Scholar
Asadnabizadeh M., “Analysis of Internal Factors of the Swing States in the International Climate Change Negotiations: A Case study of Poland in COP24,” American Journal of Climate Change, vol. 8 no. 2 (2019), pp. 263-283. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2019.82015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajcc.2019.82015
View in Google Scholar
Asadnabizadeh M., “Bump in the Road to Global Energy Transition: The Bottlenecks of the Carbon Markets,” Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne, vol. 79 (2023), pp. 90-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/athena.2023.79.05. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15804/athena.2023.79.05
View in Google Scholar
Asadnabizadeh M., “Climate Change in the Foreign Policy of the Trump Administration,” Environmental Policy and Law, vol. 49, no. 2-3 (2019), pp. 195-202. https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-190157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-190157
View in Google Scholar
Asadnabizadeh M., “Critical Findings of the Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) of Working Group I of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) for Global Climate Change Policymaking a Summary for Policymakers (SPM) Analysis,” International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, vol 15, no. 5 (2023), pp. 652-670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2022-0049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-04-2022-0049
View in Google Scholar
Asadnabizadeh M., “Development of UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Negotiations under COP25: Article 6 of the Paris Agreement Perspective,” Open Political Science, vol. 2, no. 1 (2019), pp. 113-119, https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2019-0012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/openps-2019-0012
View in Google Scholar
Asadnabizadeh M., “Did the Glasgow COP26 Negotiations Meet or Miss Article 6 (Carbon Markets) of the Paris Agreement? A Systematic Review of the Literature,” Politics & Policy, vol. 52, no. 4 (2024), pp. 757-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12621
View in Google Scholar
Asadnabizadeh M., “The Failure of Deep Decarbonising of Europe (DDE) by 2050 in Line with the Paris Agreement: a Losing Player Analysis,” International Journal of Global Energy Issues, vol. 43, no. 5/6 (2021), pp. 522-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijgei.2021.118928. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGEI.2021.10042556
View in Google Scholar
Asadnabizadeh M. “Status of Impacts of Extreme Climate Events at the UN Climate Change Conference (COP25),” International Journal of Climate Change: Impacts & Responses, vol. 13, no 1 (2020), pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-7156/CGP/v13i01/1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-7156/CGP/v13i01/1-11
View in Google Scholar
Asadnabizadeh M., “US President Joe Biden’s Administration: A New U.S. Climate Change Agenda (U.S. CCA),” Journal of Politics and Law, vol. 14, no. 3 (2021), pp. 124-137. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v14n3p124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v14n3p124
View in Google Scholar
Asadnabizadeh M., Moe E., “A Review of Global Carbon Markets from Kyoto to Paris and beyond: The persistent failure of implementation,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 12 (2024), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1368105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1368105
View in Google Scholar
Barouki R. et al., “Addendum to: ‘The COVID-19 pandemic and global environmental change: Emerging research needs’. Environ. Int. 146 (2021) 106272.” Environment International, vol. 152 (2021), pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106491. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2021.106491
View in Google Scholar
Behr P. et al., “Rethinking voluntary carbon credit markets and the EU ETS: A critical review,” Discussion Papers In Business And Economics, Discussion Paper no. 22, June 2022, at https://fuldok.hs-fulda.de/opus4/frontdoor/deliver/index/docId/960/file/Discussion+Paper+No+22+V.
View in Google Scholar
Blum M., “The Legitimation of Contested Carbon Markets after Paris – Empirical Insights from Market Stakeholders,” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, vol. 22, no. 2 (2020), pp. 226-238, https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2019.1697658. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1697658
View in Google Scholar
Broom D., “Climate Change: What is COP26 and why does it Matter?,” World Economic Forum 10 May 2021, at https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/03/cop26-un-climate-change-summit/.
View in Google Scholar
Bryden D. et al., “COP26: What is it and why is it Important?,” Travers Smith, 1 April 2021, https://www.traverssmith.com/knowledge/knowledge-container/cop26-what-is-itand-why-is-it-important/.
View in Google Scholar
Cadman T., Sarker T., De Gruyter Handbook of Sustainable Development and Finance, Berlin 2022, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110733488
View in Google Scholar
Camba A., “Inter-State Relations and State Capacity: The Rise and Fall of Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in the Philippines,” Palgrave Communications, vol. 3, no. 1 (2017), pp. 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0033-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0033-0
View in Google Scholar
Capoor K., Ambrosi P., State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2008, Washington 2008, at https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/13405/44607.pdf ?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
View in Google Scholar
Clarke B. et al., “Mechanisms and the Evidence Hierarchy,” Topoi, vol. 33, no. 2 (2013), pp. 339-360, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9220-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-013-9220-9
View in Google Scholar
“COP 19,” United Nations Climate Change, 11-12 November 2013, at https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/conferences/past-conferences/warsaw-climate-change-conference-november-2013/cop-19.
View in Google Scholar
“COP 20 Outcomes and Critiques,” African Climate & Development Institute, 23 December 2014, at http://www.acdi.uct.ac.za/acdi/news/cop-20-outcomes-and-critiques.
View in Google Scholar
“COP22 Summary Report. Marrakech,” International Emissions Trading Association, 20 November 2016, at https://www.ieta.org/resources/UNFCCC/COP22/COP22WRAP_FINAL.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
“COP24: UN Climate Change Conference, what’s at Stake and What You Need to Know?,” United Nations News, 29 November 2018, at https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/11/1026851.
View in Google Scholar
“COP25 to be the Launchpad for Significantly more Climate Ambition,” United
View in Google Scholar
Nations Climate Change, 29 November 2019, at https://unfccc.int/news/cop25-to-be-the-launchpad-for-significantly-more-climate-ambition-0.
View in Google Scholar
Daggash H.A., Dowell N.M., “Higher Carbon Prices on Emissions Alone will not Deliver the Paris Agreement,” Joule, vol. 3, no. 9 (2019), pp. 2120-2133, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.08.008
View in Google Scholar
Dagnet Y. et al., “INSIDER: 4 Key Topics Climate Negotiators Must Resolve by COP26,”.
View in Google Scholar
World Resources Institute, 11 December 2020, at https://www.wri.org/insights/insider-4-key-topics-climate-negotiators-must-resolve-cop26.
View in Google Scholar
Deheza M. et al., “COP22 in Marrakech: A Push for Accelerated Action by 2018,” Institute for Climate Economics Climate Brief, no. 43 (2016).
View in Google Scholar
DellaSala D.A., Goldstein M.I., Encyclopedia of the Anthropocene, 1st edition, Oxford 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809665-9.10536-1
View in Google Scholar
Depledge J., Saldivia M., Peñasco C., “Glass Half Full or Glass Half Empty? The 2021 Glasgow Climate Conference,” Climate Policy, vol. 22, no. 2 (2022), pp. 147-157, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2038482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2022.2038482
View in Google Scholar
“Dictionary of Psychology,” American Psychological Association, at https://dictionary.apa.org/state-orientation.
View in Google Scholar
Dröge S., Rattani V., “After the Katowice Climate Summit: Building Blocks for the EU Climate Agenda,” Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit, no. 9 (2019), pp. 1-7,https://doi.org/10.18449/2019C09.
View in Google Scholar
Evans S., Wu A.Z., “What Drives Cooperation in Carbon Markets? Lessons from Decision-Makers in the Australia-EU ETS Linking Negotiations,” Climate Policy, vol. 21, no. 8 (2021), pp. 1086-1098, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1953436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1953436
View in Google Scholar
“Fact Sheet: The Need for Mitigation,” United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, November 2009, at https://unfccc.int/files/press/backgrounders/application/pdf/press_factsh_mitigation.
View in Google Scholar
Farand C., “UK Negotiator: Countries must Resolve Carbon Market Dispute to Step up Ambition,” Climate Home News, 29 October 2020, at https://www.climatechangenews.com/2020/10/29/uk-negotiator-countries-must-resolve-carbon-market-dispute-stepambition/.
View in Google Scholar
Flemming K., Noyes J., “Qualitative Evidence Synthesis: Where are We at?,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 20 (2021), pp. 1-13, https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921993276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406921993276
View in Google Scholar
Frank S., “The Lengthened and Stony Road to Glasgow,” Carbon Market Watch, 28 January 2021, at https://carbonmarketwatch.org/2021/01/28/the-lengthened-and-stony-road-to-glasgow/.
View in Google Scholar
Gao Y., Gao X., Zhang X., “The 2 °C Global Temperature Target and the Evolution of the Long-Term Goal of Addressing Climate Change – from the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to the Paris Agreement,” Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2 (2017), pp. 272-278, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2017.01.022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.01.022
View in Google Scholar
Green E., “Voluntary Carbon Offsets ‘Need New Oversight Body’,” Argus, 27 January 2021, at https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news/2181175-voluntary-carbon-offsets-need-new-oversight-body.
View in Google Scholar
Green J.F., “Don’t Link Carbon Markets,” Nature, vol. 543 (2017), pp. 484-486, https://doi.org/10.1038/543484a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/543484a
View in Google Scholar
Greening P., Strachan E., “COP26 and Creating a Center for Carbon Trading,” mondaq, 15 November 2021, at https://www.mondaq.com/climate-change/1131200/.
View in Google Scholar
Greiner S. et al., Moving Towards Next Generation Carbon Markets: Observations from Article 6 Pilots, Freiburg 2019, at https://www.zora.uzh.ch/id/eprint/175360/1/ZORA17360.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Greiner S. et al., “COP26 Digest: The Significance of “Article 6 and CDM Transition Outcomes for Africa,” Climate Focus, May 2022, at https://climatefocus.com/publications/cop2-6-digest-significance-article-6-and-cdm-transition-outcomes-africa/, 31 XII 2024.
View in Google Scholar
Grimston M.C. et al., “The European and Global Potential of Carbon Dioxide Sequestration in Tackling Climate Change,” Climate Policy, vol. 1, no. 2 (2001), pp. 155-171, https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2001.0120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1469-3062(01)00002-X
View in Google Scholar
Hales R., Mackey B., “The Ultimate Guide to why the COP26 Summit Ended in Failure and Disappointment (Despite a Few Bright Spots),” The Conversation, 14 November 2021, at https://theconversation.com/the-ultimate-guide-to-why-the-cop26-summit-ended-infailure-and-disappointment-despite-a-few-bright-spots-171723.
View in Google Scholar
Harsh S., Clarke D., “Advancements in Research Synthesis Methods: From a Methodologically Inclusive Perspective,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 79, no. 1 (2009), pp. 395-430, https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326349
View in Google Scholar
History of UN Climate Talks,” Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, at https://www.c2es.org/content/history-of-un-climate-talks/.
View in Google Scholar
Hone D., “Article 6 at COP26,” Shell Climate Change, 11 October 2021, at https://blogs.shell.com/2021/10/11/article-6-at-cop26/.
View in Google Scholar
Jackson P., “From Stockholm to Kyoto: A Brief History of Climate Change,” United Nations, 1 June 2007, at https://www.un.org/en/chronicle/article/stockholm-kyoto-brief-historyclimate-change.
View in Google Scholar
Jennings A., “The Movement to Replace Neoliberalism Has Lost a Battle, But We Can Still Win the War,” Global Policy, 25 February 2020, at https://www.globalpolicyjournal.com/blog/25/02/2020/movement-replace-neoliberalism-has-lost-battle-we-can-still-win-war.
View in Google Scholar
Jones N., “Highs and Lows from COP20: The Twentieth UNFCCC Climate Change Negotiations in Review,” Youth Policy Labs, at https://www.youthpolicy.org/articles/participation-global-governance/cop20-in-review, 31 XII 2024.
View in Google Scholar
Kelley K., Levin K., Rambharos M., “What You Need to Know about Article 6 of the Paris Agreement,” World Resources Institute, 2 December 2019, at https://www.wri.org/insights/what-you-need-know-about-article-6-paris-agreement.
View in Google Scholar
Knaepen H., “COP25: The Eternal Challenge of Competing Interests,” ecdpm, 16 December 2019, at https://ecdpm.org/talking-points/cop25-eternal-challenge-competing-interests/.
View in Google Scholar
Kreibich N., Hermwille L., “Caught in Between: Credibility and Feasibility of the Voluntary Carbon Market Post-2020,” Climate Policy, vol. 21, no. 7 (2021), pp. 939-957, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1948384. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1948384
View in Google Scholar
“Learning for Sustainability: COP26,” Youth Link Scotland, at https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/learning-forsustainabilitycop26overview-250374091/250374091, 31 XII 2024.
View in Google Scholar
Lewis M., “The COP that was not – Will Postponing COP26 Affect Global Climate Action?,” Investors’ Corner, at https://hub.ipe.com/asset-manager/bnp-paribas-asset-management/the-cop-that-was-not-will-postponing-cop26-affect-global-climate-action/10049851.supplierarticle,31 XII 2024.
View in Google Scholar
Masood E., Tollefson J., “«COP26 hasn’t Solved the Problem»: Scientists React to UN Climate Deal,” Nature, vol. 599 (2021), pp. 355-356, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-03431-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-03431-4
View in Google Scholar
Mohan A. et al., „UNFCCC Must Confront the Political Economy of Net-Negative Emissions,” One Earth, vol. 4, no. 10 (2021), pp. 1348-1351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.10.001
View in Google Scholar
Moosmann L. et al., International Climate Negotiations: Issues at Stake in View of the COP25UN Climate Change Conference in Madrid, ENVI Committee, at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2019/642344/IPOL_STU(2019)642344_EN.pdf,31 XII 2024.
View in Google Scholar
Mountford H. et al., “COP26: Key Outcomes from the UN Climate Talks in Glasgow,” World Resources Institute, 17 November 2021, at https://www.wri.org/insights/cop26-key-outcomes-un-climate-talks-glasgow?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=socialmedia.
View in Google Scholar
Murphy D. et al., “A Systematic Review and MetaSynthesis of Qualitative Research into Mandatory Personal Psychotherapy during Training,” Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, vol. 18, no. 2 (2018), pp. 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12162. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12162
View in Google Scholar
Newell P., Taylor O., “Fiddling while the Planet Burns? COP25 in Perspective,” Globalizations, vol. 17, no. 4 (2020), pp. 580-592. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1726127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2020.1726127
View in Google Scholar
Nhamo G., “UNFCCC Decision on Agriculture: Africa Must Continue Prioritising Adaptation in the Talanoa Dialogue and (I)NDC Processes,” South African Journal of International Affairs, vol. 25, no. 3 (2018), pp. 281-299, https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2018.1522275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2018.1522275
View in Google Scholar
“November Editorial: A Bad Deal or no Deal at COP26?,” Global S&T Development Trend Analysis Platform of Resources and Environment, 26 November 2021, at http://resp.llas.ac.cn/C666/handle/2XK7JSWQ/342298.
View in Google Scholar
O’Neill S., “COP26: Some Progress, But Nations Still Fiddling while World Warms,” Engineering, vol. 11 (2022), pp. 6-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2022.02.004
View in Google Scholar
Obergassel W. et al., “Turning Point Glasgow? An Assessment of the Climate Conference COP26,” Carbon & Climate Law Review, vol. 15, no. 4 (2021), pp. 271-281, https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/4/4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/4/4
View in Google Scholar
Obergassel W. et al., “Climate Diplomacy on Hold, But not Climate Change: An Analysis of International Climate Policy in the Year of the Pandemic,” Carbon & Climate Law Review, vol. 15, no. 3 (2021), pp. 211-220, https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/3/4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2021/3/4
View in Google Scholar
Obergassel W. et al. „COP25 in Search of Lost Time for Action: An Assessment of the Madrid Climate Conference,” Carbon & Climate Law Review, vol. 14, no. 1 (2020), pp. 3-17, https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2020/1/4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2020/1/4
View in Google Scholar
Obergassel W., Hermwille L., Oberthür S., “Harnessing International Climate Governance to Drive a Sustainable Recovery from the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Climate Policy, vol. 21, no. 10 (2021), pp. 1298-1306, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1835603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2020.1835603
View in Google Scholar
Operationalizing Article 6 of the Paris Agreement: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), United Kingdom 2017, at https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=1b-491f68d68c6670e286533538e738cd2142590d7f60fdbd610e83a34cd807a7JmltdHM9MTczNzUwNDAwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=02839a5a-065f-6c32-137c-8ac507466d64&psq=Operationalizing+Article+6+of+the+Paris+Agreement%3a+European+Bank+for+Reconstruction+and+De+velopment+(EBRD)%2c+United+Kingdom+2017&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZWJyZC5jb20vc2l0ZXMvU2F0ZWxsaXRlP-2M9Q29udGVudCZjaWQ9MTM5NTI4NjgyNDk0NCZwYWdlbmFtZT1FQlJEJTJGQ29udGVudCUyRkRvd25sb2FkRG9jdW1lbnQ&ntb=1, 31 XII 2024.
View in Google Scholar
“Outcomes of the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Durban, South Africa: Seventeenth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP 17) and Seventh Session of the Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP 7): November 28-December 11 2011,” The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, 2011, at https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2011/12/outcomes-of-the-un-climate-change-conference-in-durban.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
“Outcomes of the U.N. Climate Change Conference in Warsaw: Nineteenth Session of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (COP 19): November 11-22 2013,” The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, 2013, at https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2013/11/outcomes-of-the-u-n-climatechange-conference-in-warsaw.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
“The Paris Agreement and Paris Rulebook,” The London School of Economics and Political Science, 2020, at https://www.lse.ac.uk/granthaminstitute/events/landing-the-paris-climate-agreementhow-it-happened-why-it-matters-and-what-comes-next/, 31 XII 2024.
View in Google Scholar
“Paris Climate Agreement Q&A,” Center for Climate and Energy Solutions, February 2021, at https://www.c2es.org/site/assets/uploads/2021/02/paris-climate-agreement-qa.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Persico G., “Non-Market Approaches Under Article 6 PA: Yet to be Defined,” Italian Climate Network, 4 November 2022, at https://www.italiaclima.org/en/cop26-non-market-approaches/.
View in Google Scholar
Poulopoulos S., Inglezakis V., Environment and Development: Basic Principles, Human Activities, and Environmental Implications, 1st edition, Amsterdam 2016.
View in Google Scholar
Puig D., Roberts E., Loss and Damage at COP26, DTU Library 2021, at https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/loss-and-damage-at-cop26/fingerprints/.
View in Google Scholar
Rabe B.G., “Beyond Kyoto: Climate Change Policy in Multilevel Governance Systems,” Governance, vol. 20, no. 3 (2007), pp. 423-444, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00365.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00365.x
View in Google Scholar
Rajamani L., Bodansky D., “The Paris Rulebook: Balancing International Prescriptiveness with National Discretion,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 68, no. 4 (2019), pp. 1023-1040, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020589319000320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589319000320
View in Google Scholar
“Report of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice on its Forty-Fourth Session, Held in Bonn from 16 to 26 May 2016,” United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 27 July 2016, at https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2016/sbsta/eng/02.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
“Research Guides: Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper,” USC Libraries, at https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/methodology.
View in Google Scholar
Rogelj J. et al., 2016. “Paris Agreement Climate Proposals Need a Boost to Keep Warming Well Below 2 °C,” Nature, vol. 534 (2016), pp. 631-639, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18307
View in Google Scholar
Rogelj J. et al., “Emission Pathways Consistent with a 2 °C Global Temperature Limit,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 1, no. 8 (2011), pp. 413-418, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1258. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1258
View in Google Scholar
Schleussner C.-F. et al., “Science and Policy Characteristics of the Paris Agreement Temperature Goal,” Nature Climate Change, vol. 6, no. 9 (2016), pp. 827-835, https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3096. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3096
View in Google Scholar
Seo S.N., “Beyond the Paris Agreement: Climate Change Policy Negotiations and Future Directions,” Regional Science Policy & Practice, vol. 9, no. 2 (2017), pp. 121-141, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3111175. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12090
View in Google Scholar
Shockley K., “Sustainable Development Goals and Nationally Determined Contributions: The Poor Fit between Agent-Dependent and Agent-Independent Policy Instruments,” Journal of Global Ethics, vol. 14, no. 3 (2018), pp. 369-386, https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2019.1569087. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2019.1569087
View in Google Scholar
Snyder H., “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines,”Journal of Business Research, vol. 104 (2019), pp. 333-339, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
View in Google Scholar
Stages of Climate Change Negotiations, 2021, at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/infographic/climate-negotiations-timeline/index_en.html, 31 XII 2024.
View in Google Scholar
Steinebach Y., Limberg J., “Implementing Market Mechanisms in the Paris Era: The Importance of Bureaucratic Capacity Building for International Climate Policy,” Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 29, no. 7 (2021), pp. 1153-1168, https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1925330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1925330
View in Google Scholar
Streck C. et al., “The Durban Climate Conference between Success and Frustration,” Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, vol. 9, no. 2 (2012), pp. 201-221, https://doi.org/10.1163/187601012x639853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/187601012X639853
View in Google Scholar
Streck C., von Unger M., Greiner S., “Cop 25: Losing Sight of (Raising) Ambition,” Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, vol. 17, no. 2 (2020), pp. 136-160, https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01702003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01702003
View in Google Scholar
Streck Ch., Greiner S., “COP23 – Fiji/Bonn – Progress in Two Zones,” Climate Focus, January 2018, at https://climatefocus.com/publications/cop23-fijibonn-progress-two-zones/, 31 XII 2024.
View in Google Scholar
Timperley J., “COP23: Key Outcomes Agreed at the UN Climate Talks in Bonn,” Carbon Brief, 19 November 2017, at https://www.carbonbrief.org/cop23-key-outcomes-agreed-un-climate-talks-bonn.
View in Google Scholar
“UK to Host 2021 UN Climate Summit, COP26,” Energy & Climate Intelligence Unit, 2021. https://eciu.net/analysis/briefings/international-perspectives/cop-26.
View in Google Scholar
“UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) at the SEC – Glasgow 2021,” 2021, at https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20230401054904/https://ukcop26.org/, 31 XII 2024.
View in Google Scholar
“UN Climate Talks: 1992-2023,” Council on Foreign Relations, at https://www.cfr.org/timeline/un-climate-talks.
View in Google Scholar
“Uniting on Climate,” United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2007, at https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/publications/unitingonclimate_eng.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Vetter D., “Climate Change Experts: Here’s why a Virtual COP26 won’t Work,” Forbes, 8 April 2020, at https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidrvetter/2020/04/08/climate-change-experts-heres-why-a-virtual-cop26-wont-work/?sh=4a6811074ec5.
View in Google Scholar
Victor D.G., The Collapse of the Kyoto Protocol and the Struggle to Slow Global Warming, 1st edition, New Jersey 2001.
View in Google Scholar
Wang Y., Liu Y., Gu B., “COP26: Progress, Challenges, and Outlook,” Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 39, no. 8 (2022), pp. 1209-1216, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-2097-z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-022-2097-z
View in Google Scholar
Weikmans R., van Asselt H., Roberts J.T., “Transparency Requirements under the Paris Agreement and Their (Un)Likely Impact on Strengthening the Ambition of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs),” Climate Policy, vol. 20, no. 4 (2019), pp. 511-526, https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1695571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1695571
View in Google Scholar
“What is COP26?,” The London School of Economics and Political Science, 2020, at https://www.lse.ac.uk/international-development/events/Cutting-Edge-Series-202122/Outcomes-of-COP26-and-where-next-on-Climate, 31 XII 2024.
View in Google Scholar
White C.J., Sindico F., Bell K., “Climate Change: COP26 Glasgow will Provide World Stage for Scotland’s Green Innovation,” The Conversation, 8 January 2020, at https://theconversation.com/climate-change-cop26-glasgow-will-provide-world-stage-for-scotlands-greeninnovation-129158.
View in Google Scholar
Yamin F., Climate Change and Carbon Markets, 1st edition, London 2012, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849770781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849770781
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
