The OSCE and Human Dimension in the Republic of Georgia
Reflections on Current Developments
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.22.2025.96.2.15Keywords:
OSCE, Republic of Georgia, human dimension, democratic institutions, rule of law, electionsAbstract
The article focuses on the OSCE’s actions in the human dimension, using Georgia as a case study of a country facing constant challenges. The research aligns with the functionalist school, highlighting the essential role of international organizations in tasks beyond state capabilities. Research methods include archival research, interviews during a study visit to Georgia, election observation missions, and analysis of OSCE documents, focusing on the 2023-2024 political crisis. The OSCE’s presence and support have been crucial for progress in areas like rule of law, institution building, and electoral transparency. However, although the OSCE has been present and active in that region, its recommendations are not fully implemented by the Georgian government. Georgian authorities have often contradicted OSCE recommendations, particularly in upholding civil rights and ensuring transparent elections.
Downloads
References
“Address by President Zourabichvili on the Non-Recognition of the Election Results,” President of Georgia, 27 October 2024, at https://president.ge/index.php?m=206&appeals_id=424.
View in Google Scholar
“Amb. Herczyński: A Completely New, ‘Heartbreaking’ Reality,” Civil Georgia, 29 November 2024, at https://civil.ge/archives/639126.
View in Google Scholar
Baylis J., Smith S. (eds), The Globalization of the World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Oxford 2005.
View in Google Scholar
Brodowski J., Krzysztan B., Piechowiak J., “Instrumentalization of the Constitutional Order as a Tool of Political Control in the Post-Soviet Space: The Case of the Republic of Georgia,” Przegląd Prawa Konstytucyjnego, vol. 64, no. 6 (2021), pp. 281-290, https://doi.org/10.15804/ppk.2021.06.22.
View in Google Scholar
Cichocki B., “Kryzys OBWE i polityka Rosji,” Bezpieczeństwo Narodowe, vol. III-IV, no. 5-6 (2007), pp. 366-377.
View in Google Scholar
“Countries and Territories: Georgia,” Freedom House, at https://freedomhouse.org/countries/freedom-world/scores.
View in Google Scholar
“EU Accession Process Halted, Aid to MoD Frozen, Relations at a Low Point, Ambassador Herczyński Regrets,” Civil Georgia, 9 July 2024, at https://civil.ge/archives/615670.
View in Google Scholar
Gelashvili N., “Georgian ‘Foreign Agent’ Bill Would Hamper NGOs, OSCE Official Warns,” Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty, 30 April 2024, at https://www.rferl.org/a/georgian-foreign-agent-bill-osce-ngos/32927822.html.
View in Google Scholar
“Georgia – Parliamentary Elections, 26 October 2024: Statement of Preliminary Findings and Conclusions,” Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, at https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/3/0/579346.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
“Georgia, Parliamentary Elections, 31 October 2020: Final Report,” Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, at https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/georgia/480500.
View in Google Scholar
“Georgia, Parliamentary Elections, 26 October 2024: Final Report,” Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, at https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/georgia/584029.
View in Google Scholar
“Georgia’s ‘Transparency of Foreign Influence’ Law Incompatible with Democratic Standards and Human Rights Law: International Human Rights Office ODIHR,” Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, at https://www.osce.org/odihr/569925.
View in Google Scholar
Greminger T., “Czas kryzysu dla OBWE,” Polski Przegląd Dyplomatyczny, vol. 2 (2022), pp. 42-51.
View in Google Scholar
Górecki W., “OBWE na Kaukazie Południowym. Czas przeszły niedokonany?,” Polski Przegląd Dyplomatyczny, vol. 2 (2022), pp. 61-69.
View in Google Scholar
Górecki W., “The EU’s Ambivalent Neighbours: Brussels on the South Caucasus,” OSW Commentary, vol. 582 (2024), pp. 1-7, at https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/oswcommentary/ 2024-03-15/eus-ambivalent-neighbours-brussels-south-caucasus.
View in Google Scholar
Hill W.H., “The OSCE Approaching Fifty: Does the Organization Have a Future?,” in C. Friesendorf, A. Kartsonaki (eds), OSCE Insights 2022: War in Europe, Baden-Baden 2023, pp. 13-22, https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748933625-01.
View in Google Scholar
Jarosiewicz A., “Azerbaijan Expels the OSCE,” Centre for Eastern Studies Analyses, 17 June 2015, at https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2015-06-17/azerbaijan-expels-osce.
View in Google Scholar
Kolarz S., “Underestimated, Yet Irreplaceable: The OSCE Maintains Focus on the Human Dimension,” PISM Bulletin, vol. 169, no. 2086 (2022), at https://pism.pl/publications/underestimated-yet-irreplaceable-the-osce-maintains-focus-on-the-human-dimension.
View in Google Scholar
Kościński P., “Misja OBWE musi opuścić Gruzję,” Rzeczpospolita, 23 December 2008, at https://www.rp.pl/swiat/art15872871-misja-obwe-musi-opuscic-gruzje.
View in Google Scholar
Kuźniak B., “Międzyrządowe organizacje międzynarodowe,” in E. Haliżak E (ed.), Encyklopedia stosunków międzynarodowych, Warszawa 2024, pp. 526-537.
View in Google Scholar
Mikeladze L., “Georgia and the OSCE,” in Institut für Friedensforschung und Sicherheitspolitik (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 1999, Baden-Baden 2000, pp. 93-104.
View in Google Scholar
“NATO Washington Declaration Omits Reference to Georgia’s Membership Path,” Civil Georgia, 11 July 2024, at https://civil.ge/archives/615873.
View in Google Scholar
“ODIHR Experts Discuss Electoral Recommendations and Reform in Georgia,” Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, 3 November 2022, at https://www.osce.org/odihr/elections/georgia/530419.
View in Google Scholar
“Ombudsman Asks OSCE/ODIHR for Legal Assessment on Amendments to Law on Assemblies and Demonstrations,” Civil Georgia, 18 October 2023, at https://civil.ge/archives/564260.
View in Google Scholar
Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Survey of OSCE Field Operations, Vienna
View in Google Scholar
2021, at https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/6/5/74783_3.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
“OSCE Human Rights Office Condemns Use of Excessive Force by Police during Protests in Georgia,” Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, 30 November 2024, at https://www.osce.org/odihr/581962.
View in Google Scholar
“OSCE Mission to Georgia: Overview,” Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, at https://www.osce.org/georgia-closed/43383.
View in Google Scholar
OSCE/ODIHR, Georgia, Parliamentary Elections, 26 October 2024: ODIHR Needs Assessment Mission Report 20-24 May 2024, Warsaw 2024, at https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/6/4/571810_0.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
“OSCE/ODIHR Legal Analysis: Agent’s Law Incompatible with International Human Rights Law,” Civil Georgia, 30 May 2024, at https://civil.ge/archives/610577.
View in Google Scholar
“OSCE/ODIHR Mission Visits Georgia,” Civil Georgia, 23 May 2024, at https://civil.ge/archives/609045.
View in Google Scholar
“OSCE/ODIHR Needs Assessment Mission Representatives Visit Georgia,” Civil Georgia, 21 May 2024, at https://civil.ge/archives/608532.
View in Google Scholar
OSCE/ODIHR, OSCE Human Dimension Commitments, vol. 1: Thematic Compilation, Warsaw 2022, at https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/8/4/542154_0.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
“OSCE/ODIHR Urges Government to Reject Controversial ‘Tents Law,’” Civil Georgia, 10 November 2023, at https://civil.ge/archives/568841.
View in Google Scholar
OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, Urgent Opinion on the Law of Georgia ‘On Transparency of Foreign Influence’, Warsaw 2024, https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/b/d/569922.pdfat https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/b/d/569922.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
“OSCE PA Special Representative on the South Caucasus Calls for Dialogue and Restraint Amidst Tensions in Georgia,” OSCE Parliamentary Assembly, 3 December 2024, at https://www.oscepa.org/en/news-a-media/press-releases/press-2024/osce-pa-special-representative-on-the-south-caucasus-calls-for-dialogue-and-restraint-amidst-tensions-in-georgia.
View in Google Scholar
Stöber S., “The Failure of the OSCE Mission to Georgia – What Remains?,” in Institut für Friedensforschung und Sicherheitspolitik (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2010, Baden-Baden 2011, pp. 203-220.
View in Google Scholar
Strachota K., “Drifting towards Russia: An Acute Political Crisis in Georgia,” Centre for Eastern Studies, 22 April 2024, at https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/analyses/2024-04-22/drifting-towards-russia-acute-political-crisis-georgia.
View in Google Scholar
“Trust – Ombudsman,” Caucasus Barometer 2024 Georgia, at https://www.caucasusbarometer.org/en/cb2024ge/TRUOMB/.
View in Google Scholar
“U.S. ‘Indefinitely’ Postpones Noble Partner Exercise in Georgia,” Civil Georgia, 5 July 2024, at https://civil.ge/archives/615571.
View in Google Scholar
Zellner W., Using the OSCE More Effectively – Ideas and Recommendations: Unpublished Paper for the Federal Foreign Office, Hamburg 2020, at https://ifsh.de/file/publication/2021_OSZE-Studie/20210301_USING_THE_OSCE_MORE_EFFECTIVELY.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
