Constructing and Deconstructing Pāṇini’s Grammar

The Role of Commentators

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/CIS.28.2026.01.01

Abstract

No abstract is avaliable for this article.

References

Bhate , S. 1989 . Pāṇini's Taddhita Rules, Pune: University of Poona.

Candotti, M. P., and T. Pontillo. 2018. From Commentary to paribhāṣās: Kātyāyana and Patañjali vis-à-vis Vyāḍi. In: Asiatische Studien 72(2): 515–566. https://doi.org/10.1515/ASIA-2018-0013.

Cardona, G. 1999. Recent Research in Paninian Studies. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

Deshpande, M. M. 1985. Historical Change and the Theology of Eternal Sanskrit. In: Zeitschrift für vergleichende Sprachforschung 98(1): 122–149. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40849517.

Deshpande, M. M. 2018. Scope of Early Sanskrit Usage: A Wider Approach. In: M. Deshpande and J. Houben (eds). Proceedings of the 17th World Sanskrit Conference, Vancouver, Canada, July 9-13, 2018, Section 2: Linguistics: 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14288/1.0379841.

Houben, J. E. M. 1996a. Socio-linguistic Attitudes Reflected in the Work of Bhartṛhari and Later Grammarians. In: J. E. M. Houben (ed.). Ideology and Status of Sanskrit. Leiden: Brill: 157–193.

Houben, J. E. M. 1996b. Introduction: Towards a Social History of the Sanskrit Language. In: J. E. M. Houben (ed.). Ideology and Status of Sanskrit. Leiden: Brill: 1–13.

Houben, J. E. M 2018. Linguistic Paradox and Diglossia: The Emergence of Sanskrit and Sanskritic Language in Ancient India. Open Linguistics 4: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1515/opli-2018-0001.

Klebanov, A. 2016. Texts Composed While Copying. A Critical Study of the Manuscripts of Selected Commentaries on the Kirātārjunīya, an Epic Poem in Sanskrit. PhD dissertation. Universität Hamburg.

Klebanov, A. 2020. Application of Structure Analysis to the Study of Sanskrit Commentaries on Mahākāvya. A General Overview of the Subject with a Special

Reference to the Commentaries on the Kirātārjunīya. In: S. Anandakichenin, and V. B. D’Avella (eds). The Commentary Idioms of the Tamil Learned Traditions. Pondicherry: IFP/EFEO: 523–590.

Pierdominici Leão, D. 2025. Describing the New in Old Style: Technological Modernity and Natural Imagery in A. R. Rājarājavarma’s Āṅgalasāmrājya. In: Acta Asiatica Varsoviensia 38: 151–170. https://doi.org/10.60018/Ac-AsVa.jwtg4818 .

Pollock, Sh. 2016. Philology and Freedom. In: Philological Encounters 1: 4–30. https://doi.org/10.1163/24519197-00000012.

Renou, L. 1956. Histoire de la Langue Sanskrite, Lyon-Paris : I.A.C.

Williams, T. 2024. Why Comment? Interlingual Commentaries in Early Modern India. In: Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 35(1): 1 –25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1356186324000464.

Tubb, G. A., and E. R. Boose. 2007. Scholastic Sanskrit: A Manual for Students. New York: American Institute of Buddhist Studies.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31

How to Cite

“Constructing and Deconstructing Pāṇini’s Grammar: The Role of Commentators”. 2026. Cracow Indological Studies 28 (1): XIX-XXVIII. https://doi.org/10.12797/CIS.28.2026.01.01.