Korean Unification Prospects and the United States’ Policy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/AdAmericam.14.2013.14.03Abstract
Korean unification seemed a conceivable prospect at the turn of the century, especially after the Inter‑Korean summit in 2000. This is not the case nowadays, however, in light of the provocative behavior of the North Korean regime in 2010, 2012 and 2013 (especially the declarations made in March 2013).
Since such an option seems likely in the future, U.S. foreign policy‑makers should analyze possible scenarios for Korean integration and its influence on the regional system. The costs of such an endeavor are hard to estimate, although using German unification for comparison, we may expect that such a process could ruin the economies of both Koreas, as well as the socio‑political systems of both countries. There are even greater doubts concerning whether there is any actor in the regional scene that could support Korean unification. As for the main regional players – China, Japan and the United States – such a change would be a serious challenge. This is why it is important to focus on the German example in order to strengthen the regional trust and alliance system.
The main goal of this paper is to analyze the crucial Northeast Asian challenge of American foreign policy, present the possibilities of Korean unification, assess its costs, use German unification as a point of comparison, and assess the possible influence of Korean unification on the regional system and the approaches of regional powers towards the process of creating a New Korea.
Downloads
References
Bleiker, Roland. “Identity, Difference, and the Dilemmas of Inter‑Korean Relations: Insides from Northern Defectors and the German Precedent.” Asian Perspective 28 (2), 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2004.0021
Google Scholar
A Blueprint for U.S. Policy Toward a Unified Korea: A Working Group Report of the CSIS International Security Program. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2002.
Google Scholar
Blum, Ulrich. Can Korea Learn from German Unification?. Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle Discussion Papier, no. 3, Feb. 2011.
Google Scholar
Brzeziński, Zbigniew. The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy And Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Basic Books, 1997.
Google Scholar
Carpenter, Ted. “Rolling Asia: U.S. Coziness with China Upsets the Neighbors.” Foreign Affairs Nov./Dec., 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20049124
Google Scholar
Christensen, Thomas. “China, the U.S.‑Japan Alliance and the Security Dilemma in East Asia,” [in:] Ikenberry, John, Mastanduno, Michael (eds.). International Relations Theory and the Asia‑ Pacific. New York: Columbia University Press, 2003.
Google Scholar
Dent, Christopher. “Japan, China and East Asian Regionalism: Implications for the European Union.” Asia‑ Europe Journal 7, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10308‑008‑0205‑z. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-008-0205-z
Google Scholar
Eui‑Gak, Hwang. Policy Priorities for Unified Korea. The International Centre for the Study of East Asian Development (ICSEAD), Working Paper Series, vol. 2009‑17, May 2009.
Google Scholar
The Failed States Index 2012. Web. 25 March 2013. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/failed_states_index_2012_interactive.
Google Scholar
Foster‑Carter, Aidan. “North Korea: All Roads Lead to Collapse – All the More Reasons to Engage Pyongyang,” [in:] Noland, Marcus (ed.). Economic Integration of the Korean Peninsula. Washington: Institute of International Economics, 1998: 27‑38.
Google Scholar
Garver, John. “The China‑India‑U.S. Triangle: Strategic Relations in the Post‑Cold War Era.” NBR Analysis 13 (5), 2002. The National Bureau of Asian Research. Web. 25 November 2010.
Google Scholar
Grabowski, Marcin. “An Overview of Sino American Relations 1989‑2001.” Ad Americam 5, 2006.
Google Scholar
He, Yinan. The Search for Reconciliation: Sino‑ Japanese and German Polish Relations since World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511770463
Google Scholar
Hilpert, Hans. “A Comparison of German and Korean Division: Analogies and Differences.” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies 19 (1), 2010.
Google Scholar
Kim, Jin‑Ha. “On the Threshold of Power, 2011/2012 Pyongyang’s Politics of Transition.” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies 20 (2), 2011.
Google Scholar
Kim, Woosang. “Korea as a Middle Power in the Northeast Asian Security Environment,” [in:] Ikenberry, John, Chung‑in Moon (eds.). The United States and Northeast Asia: Debates, Issues, and New Order. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield, 2008.
Google Scholar
Kyongmann, Yeong. “The Likelihood and Implications of a North Korean Attack on the South,” [in:] Noland, Marcus (ed.). Economic Integration of the Korean Peninsula. Washington: Institute of International Economics, 1998: 9‑25.
Google Scholar
Lankov, Andrei. “Kim Jong‑un’s North Korea: What Should We Expect?.” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies 21 (1), 2012.
Google Scholar
Lim Hua Sing. Japan and China in East Asian Integration. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1355/9789812307484
Google Scholar
Manyin, Mark, Nikithin, Mary, Chanlett‑Avery, Emma, Rinehart, Ian, Cooper, William. U.S.‑South Korean Relations: CRS Report for Congress. Washington: Congressional Research Service, 2013.
Google Scholar
Ming Zhang. “The Emerging Asia‑Pacific Triangle.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 52 (1), 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10357719808445237
Google Scholar
Noland Marcus (ed.). Economic Integration of the Korean Peninsula. Washington: Institute of International Economics, 1998.
Google Scholar
Noland, Marcus, Robinson, Sherman, Li‑Gang Liu. The Costs and Benefits of Korean Unification. Washington: Institute of International Economics, 1998. Web. 25 July 2011. http://www.iie.com/publications/wp/wp.cfm?ResearchID=142.
Google Scholar
OPLAN 5029 – Collapse of North Korea. Web. 25 March 2013. http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/oplan‑5029.htm.
Google Scholar
Overholt, William. Asia, America and the Transformation of Geopolitics. New York: Cambridge University Press‑RAND Corporation, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790775
Google Scholar
Pant, Harsh. “Feasibility of the Russia‑China‑India Strategic Triangle: Assessment of Theoretical and Empirical Issues.” International Studies 43 (1), 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002088170504300103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002088170504300103
Google Scholar
Pollack, Jonathan, Chung Min Lee. Preparing for Korean Unification: Scenarios and Implications. Santa Monica: RAND, 1999.
Google Scholar
Ross, Robert (ed.). China, the United States, and the Soviet Union: Tripolarity and the Policy Making in the Cold War. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe, 1993.
Google Scholar
Rourke, John. International Politics on the World Stage. Guilford: McGraw Hill, 1997.
Google Scholar
Seung Mo Choi, Hyung Seok Kim, St. Brown, Max. Economic Impact of Reunifications in Germany and in Korea. Apr. 2011. Web. 25 July 2011. http://user.chol.com/~estudiar/English/reunification.pdf.
Google Scholar
Shambaugh, David. “The New Strategic Triangle: U.S. and European Reactions to China’s Rise.” The Washington Quarterly 28 (3), 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/0163660054026470
Google Scholar
Silver, Neil. The United States, Japan, and China: Setting the Course. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2000.
Google Scholar
Snyder, Scott. “Managing Integration on the Korean Peninsula: The Positive and Normative Case for Gradualism with or without Integration,” [in:] Noland, Marcus (ed.). Economic Integration of the Korean Peninsula. Washington: Institute of International Economics, 1998: 39‑50.
Google Scholar
Snyder, Scott. “Prospects for Sino‑American Policy Coordination toward North Korea.” International Journal of Korean Unification Studies 21(1), 2012.
Google Scholar
Soerensen, Camilla. “Strategic ‘Triangularity’ in Northeast Asia: The Sino‑Japanese Security Relationship and U.S. Policy.” Asian Perspective 30 (3), 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2006.0014
Google Scholar
Statement of Ms. Mindy Kotler, Director, Asia Policy Point: Japan’s Relationship with Its Neighbors: Back to the Future?. 2006. Hearing before the Committee on International Relations, House of Representatives, One Hundred Ninth Congress, Second Session, September 14, 2006. Web. 10 Januart 2013. http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa29883.000/hfa29883_0f.htm.
Google Scholar
U.S. Policy Toward the Korean Peninsula. Snyder, Scott (project director). Indepentent Task Force Report no. 64. New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2010.
Google Scholar
Vogel, Ezra, Yuan Ming, Akihiko Tanaka (eds.). The Age of Uncertainty: The U.S.‑ China Japan Triangle from Tiananmen (1989) to 9/11 (2001). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Asia Center, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvrs8z88
Google Scholar
Wolf, Charles, Akramov, Kamil. North Korean Paradoxes: Circumstances, Costs and Consequences of Korean Unification. Santa Monica: RAND, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/MG333
Google Scholar
Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka. Japan and East Asia in Transition: Trade Policy, Crisis and Evolution, and Regionalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781403918673
Google Scholar
You Ji. “East Asian Community: A New Platform for Sino‑Japanese Cooperation and Contention.” Japanese Studies 26 (1), 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10371390600636059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10371390600636059
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2013 Marcin Grabowski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
