What Is the American Myth Really Like?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/AdAmericam.15.2014.15.02Abstract
This article sets out to establish the main characteristics of the American Myth. The phenomenon is defined here as “the sum of views, visions, images, values, beliefs and opinions presenting the United States as a positive country, and Americans, as a people, in a good light.” The article also addresses the concept (after W. Blum) of the American Nightmare or American Demon that encompasses all the opposites of the positive connotations of the term American Myth.
The main questions posed here are: How is it possible that the culture, civilization and society of a relatively young country can currently shape and effectively influence the world to such an extent? Why not an older and more “esteemed” civilization and culture? The author tries to establish the impact that “Americanness” has had on the rest of the world. The main elements of the American Myth seem to be: the promise of a better “something,” wealth in the American way, the American mythical millionaire, optimism and individualism, success the American way, remoteness and distance, modernity and progress, freedom and democracy and – finally – a supportive attitude towards war and violence. The paper attempts an analysis and evaluation of these from the perspective of cultural and political studies.
Myth is not a lie. A myth is a story, compounded of fact and fiction, which expresses something fundamental about the worldview and the values of the people who tell it: what they assume about how the world is and how people should and do live in it. The people who tell a myth do not judge it by whether it can be proven factually true. Rather, it shapes their view of truth; it tells them what they can accept as factually true and what they must consider false. A mythic story can be told explicitly, or it can be merely implied by a few brief words or an image or action. Either way, a myth evokes powerful emotions because it expresses something essential about the identity of the group and its members, as they see it (Chernus).
Downloads
References
“The other American Dream.” The Economist, Nov 24th 2012. Web. 23 October 2014, http://www.economist.com/news/special‑report/21566779‑border‑traffic‑isnt‑all‑one‑way‑other‑american‑dream.
Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. Ameryka. Tłum. Renata Lis, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sic!, 1998.
Google Scholar
Berezowski, Maksymilian. Krótka encyklopedia USA. Warszawa: DW Elipsa, 2001.
Google Scholar
Blum, William. Rogue State: a Guide to the World’s Only Superpower. New York: Common Courage Press, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350251175
Google Scholar
Bryson, Bill. Zapiski z wielkiego kraju. Tłum. Dagmara Chojnacka, Warszawa: Zysk i S‑ka, 2001.
Google Scholar
Brzeziński, Zbigniew. Wybór: dominacja czy przywództwo. Kraków: Znak, 2004.
Google Scholar
Carnegie, Dale. How to Win Friends and Influence People. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1936.
Google Scholar
Chernus, Ira. Mythic America. Web. 14 September 2013. http://mythicamerica.wordpress.com/about‑mythic‑america.
Google Scholar
Domosławski, Artur. Ameryka zbuntowana: siedemnaście dialogów o ciemnych stronach imperium wolności. Warszawa: Świat Książki, 2007.
Google Scholar
Garrison, Jim. Ameryka jako imperium: przywódca świata czy bandycka potęga. Warszawa: Von Borowiecky, 2005.
Google Scholar
Himmelfarb, Gertrude. Jeden naród, dwie kultury. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Akademickie i Profesjonalne, 2007.
Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. Kim jesteśmy: wyzwania dla amerykańskiej tożsamości narodowej. Tłum. Bartłomiej Pietrzyk, Kraków: Znak, 2007.
Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert, Potęga i raj: Ameryka i Europa w nowym porządku świata. Warszawa: Studia Emka, 2003.
Google Scholar
Kaiser‑Lechowicz, Anna. “Poleganie na samym sobie: indywidualizm i demokracja amerykańska.” Amerykańska demokracja w XXI wieku. Ed. Paweł Laidler. Kraków: Wydawnictwo UJ, 2006: 245‑252.
Google Scholar
Kozłowski, Sławomir Grzegorz. Współczesna Ameryka: mity i rzeczywistość. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS, 2001.
Google Scholar
Lexington. “The American Dream, RIP?” The Economist. Web. 24 October 2014, http://www.economist.com/news/united‑states/21586581‑economist‑asks‑provocative‑questions‑about‑future‑social‑mobility‑american.
Google Scholar
Lubowski, Andrzej. Kontuzjowane mocarstwo: siła i słabość Ameryki. Warszawa: Świat Książki, 2007.
Google Scholar
Łysiak, Waldemar. Asfaltowy saloon. Warszawa: Nobilis, 2005.
Google Scholar
Michałek, Krzysztof (red.). Konstytucja oraz inne podstawowe dokumenty i symbole amerykańskiej kultury patriotycznej. Warszawa: Mada, 2005.
Google Scholar
Petry‑Mroczkowska, Joanna. Amerykańska wojna kultur. Warszawa: Biblioteka “Więzi”, 1999.
Google Scholar
Sardar, Ziauddin, and Merryl Wyn Davies. Dlaczego ludzie nienawidzą Ameryki. Kraków: Post, 2004.
Google Scholar
Sorman, Guy. Made in America: spojrzenie na cywilizację amerykańską. Warszawa: Prószyński i S‑ka, 2005.
Google Scholar
Soros, George. Bańka amerykańskiej supremacji. Tłum. Dominika Chylińska, Kraków: Znak, 2004.
Google Scholar
Surdykowski, Jerzy. Dokąd zmierza Ameryka, czyli drugie czytanie Tocqueville’a. Warszawa: Politeja, 2001.
Google Scholar
Szymkowska‑Bartyzel, Jolanta. Amerykański mit – polski konsument, czyli reklamowe oblicza Ameryki. Kraków: Wydawnictwo UJ, 2006.
Google Scholar
Tocqueville de, Alexis. Democracy in America. London: Penguin, 2001.
Google Scholar
Woods Jr., Thomas. Niepoprawna politycznie historia Stanów Zjednoczonych. Tłum. Marcin Zieliński, Warszawa: Fijor Publishing, 2004.
Google Scholar
Zinn, Howard. A People’s History of the United States, 1942‑Present. New York: HarperCollins, 1995.
Google Scholar
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Mateusz Bogdanowicz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
