The Sense of Games and Undeserved Suffering Some Comments on Book V of Vergil’s Aeneid
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.15.2012.15.10Keywords:
Virgil, Aeneid, Aeneas, Palinurus, undeserved suffering, games on Sicily, Anchisees, Acestes, fortuna, fatum, ecphrasisAbstract
Many scholars believe that literary and artistic level of Book V of Vergils' Aeneid is much lower than in the neighbouring books four and six. Nonetheless a detailed analysis of the contents and composition allows, in my opinion, to treat Book V as interesting and valuable. Vergil concentrated primarily on the sense of suffering which often befalls innocent people. The most vivid is the example of Palinurus whose undeserved and sacrificial death permits Aeneas to continue with his mission. The death of Palinurus and Dido is, I think, a symbolic farewell of Aeneas with the Trojan past and the wandering on the sea. The participants in the games are all secondary characters. By introducing them Vergil, I believe, wished to stress the importance of every man of Aeneas' crew in the fulfilling of the task set by destiny. The importance of fatum and fortuna increases exponentially in the instances where human strength and abilities fail.
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Bailey C., 1935, Religion in Virgil, Oxford.
Barchiesi A., 1994, ‚Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell` Eneide’, Antike und Abendland 40, p. 109-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241525.109
Barchiesi A., 1997, ‚Virgilian Narrative: Ecphrasis’, [in:] Ch. Martindale (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, Cambridge, p. 271-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521495393.018
Feldherr A., 1995, ‚Ships of State: Aeneid 5 and Augustan Circus Spectacle’, Classical Antiquity 14, p. 245-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25011022
Galinsky G.K., 1968, ‚Aeneid V and the Aeneid’, The American Journal of Philology 89, p. 157-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/293134
Kehoe P.E., 1989, ‚Was Book 5 Once in a Different Place in the Aeneid’, The American Journal of Philology 110, p. 246-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/295176
Miller P.A., 1995, ‚The Minotaur Within: Fire, the Labyrinth, and Strategies of Containment in Aeneid 5 and 6’, Classical Philology 90, p. 225-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/367466
Perret J., 1942, Les origines de la légende troyenne de Rome (281-31), Paris.
Putnam M.C.J., 1962, ‚Unity and Design in Aeneid V’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 66, p. 205-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/310741
Putnam M.C.J., 1965, The Poetry of the Aeneid, Cambridge.
Ravenna G., 1974, ‚L`ekphrasis poetica di opera d`arte in latino. Temi e problemi’, Quaderni dell`Istituto di Filologia Latina dell`Università di Padova 3, p. 1-51.
Sullivan F.A., 1969, ‚Virgil and the Mystery of Suffering’, The American Journal of Philology 90, p. 161-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/293424
Williams R.D., 1960, P. Vergilii Maronis Aeneidos liber quintus, edited with a commentary, Oxford.
Willis W.H., 1941, ‚Athletic Contests in the Epic’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 72, p. 392-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/283065
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Stanisław Śnieżewski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.