The Sense of Games and Undeserved Suffering Some Comments on Book V of Vergil’s Aeneid

Authors

  • Stanisław Śnieżewski Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.15.2012.15.10

Keywords:

Virgil, Aeneid, Aeneas, Palinurus, undeserved suffering, games on Sicily, Anchisees, Acestes, fortuna, fatum, ecphrasis

Abstract

Many scholars believe that literary and artistic level of Book V of Vergils' Aeneid is much lower than in the neighbouring books four and six. Nonetheless a detailed analysis of the contents and composition allows, in my opinion, to treat Book V as interesting and valuable. Vergil concentrated primarily on the sense of suffering which often befalls innocent people. The most vivid is the example of Palinurus whose undeserved and sacrificial death permits Aeneas to continue with his mission. The death of Palinurus and Dido is, I think, a symbolic farewell of Aeneas with the Trojan past and the wandering on the sea. The participants in the games are all secondary characters. By introducing them Vergil, I believe, wished to stress the importance of every man of Aeneas' crew in the fulfilling of the task set by destiny. The importance of fatum and fortuna increases exponentially in the instances where human strength and abilities fail.

References

Bailey C., 1935, Religion in Virgil, Oxford.

Barchiesi A., 1994, ‚Rappresentazioni del dolore e interpretazione nell` Eneide’, Antike und Abendland 40, p. 109-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110241525.109

Barchiesi A., 1997, ‚Virgilian Narrative: Ecphrasis’, [in:] Ch. Martindale (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Virgil, Cambridge, p. 271-281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521495393.018

Feldherr A., 1995, ‚Ships of State: Aeneid 5 and Augustan Circus Spectacle’, Classical Antiquity 14, p. 245-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/25011022

Galinsky G.K., 1968, ‚Aeneid V and the Aeneid’, The American Journal of Philology 89, p. 157-185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/293134

Kehoe P.E., 1989, ‚Was Book 5 Once in a Different Place in the Aeneid’, The American Journal of Philology 110, p. 246-263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/295176

Miller P.A., 1995, ‚The Minotaur Within: Fire, the Labyrinth, and Strategies of Containment in Aeneid 5 and 6’, Classical Philology 90, p. 225-240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/367466

Perret J., 1942, Les origines de la légende troyenne de Rome (281-31), Paris.

Putnam M.C.J., 1962, ‚Unity and Design in Aeneid V’, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 66, p. 205-239. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/310741

Putnam M.C.J., 1965, The Poetry of the Aeneid, Cambridge.

Ravenna G., 1974, ‚L`ekphrasis poetica di opera d`arte in latino. Temi e problemi’, Quaderni dell`Istituto di Filologia Latina dell`Università di Padova 3, p. 1-51.

Sullivan F.A., 1969, ‚Virgil and the Mystery of Suffering’, The American Journal of Philology 90, p. 161-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/293424

Williams R.D., 1960, P. Vergilii Maronis Aeneidos liber quintus, edited with a commentary, Oxford.

Willis W.H., 1941, ‚Athletic Contests in the Epic’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 72, p. 392-417. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/283065

Downloads

Published

2012-05-29

How to Cite

Śnieżewski, S. “The Sense of Games and Undeserved Suffering Some Comments on Book V of Vergil’s Aeneid”. Classica Cracoviensia, vol. 15, May 2012, pp. 203-19, doi:10.12797/CC.15.2012.15.10.