Descriptive Criteria of nominal inflectional categories in Ancient Greek Grammar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.16.2013.16.13Keywords:
ancient linguistics, inflection, Dionysius Thrax, AristotleAbstract
Descriptive Criteria of nominal inflectional categories in Ancient Greek Grammar
The present paper analyses the methodology adopted in the ancient Greek grammatical tradition to define and describe the nominal inflectional categories, i.e. gender, number, and case. The main source for the said analysis is the treatise Tekhne grammatike attributed to Dionysius Thrax, but references are also made to the works of Aristotle and some other authors. The research shows that semantic (functional) criteria played the principal part in describing the nominal inflectional categories, and especially that of the case. This does not mean, however, that the formal factor was completely absent: Aristotle’s determination in searching for formal criteria of gender classes of nouns is noteworthy in this respect, as well as the attempt to associate the
number category with some formal factors, evidenced in the Tekhne.
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Allen W. S., Brink C. O., 1980, ‘The Old Order and the New: a Case History’, Lingua, No. 50, pp. 61-100.
Auerbach M., Golias M., 1952, Gramatyka grecka, Warszawa.
Von Arnim J. (ed.), 1903-1905, Stoicorum Veterum Fragmenta, Vol. 2, Lipsiae.
Belardi W., 1985, ‘Ptosis e onoma aoriston’, [in:] W. Belardi, Filosofia, grammatica e retorica nel pensiero antico, Roma, pp. 121-130.
Botas V. B.,1985, Diccionario de terminologia gramatical griega, Salamanca.
Calboli G., 1972, ‘I casi nella grammatica greca e latina’, [in:] G. Calboli, La linguistica moderna e il latino. I casi, Bologna, pp. 83-113.
Choeroboscus G., 1965, ‘Prolegomena et scholia in Theodosii Alexandrini canones isagogicos de flexione nominum’ Grammatici Graeci, A. Hilgard (ed.), Vol. 4, No. 1.
D’Avino R., 1975, ‘Il posto del ‘numero’ nella economia della ptosis aristotelica’, Helikon, No. 15-16, pp. 118-129.
Delamarre A. J.-L., 1980, ‘La notion de ptosis chez Aristote et les Stoïciens’, [in:] P. Aubenque (ed.), Concepts et catégories dans la pensée antique, Paris, pp. 321-345.
Frede M., 1978, ‘Principles of Stoic Grammar’, [in:] J. Rist (ed.), The Stoics, Los Angeles, pp. 27-75.
Frede M., 1994, ‘The Stoic Notion of a Grammatical Case’, Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies, No. 39, pp. 13-24.
Gallavotti C., 1986, ‘La flessione di nome e verbo nella „Poetica” di Aristotele’, [in:] A. Jannone, Energeia. Études aristotéliciennes offertes à Antonio Jannone, Paris, pp. 240-248.
Hilgard A., (ed.) 1901, ‘Scholia in Dionysii Thracis artem grammaticam’, Grammatici Graeci, Vol. 1, No. 3, Lipsiae (= Schol. D.T.) 257.
Koller H. 1958, ‘Die Anfänge der griechischen Grammatik’, Glotta, No. 37, pp. 5-40.
Lallot J., 1989, La Grammaire de Denys le Thrace. Traduction annotée, Paris.
Levin S., 1983, ‘The Origin of Grammar in Sophistry’, General Linguistics, No. 23, pp. 41-47.
Long A. A., 1971, ‘Language and Thought in Stoicism’, [in:] A. A. Long, Problems in Stoicism, London, pp. 75-113.
Manitius, M., 1911, Geschichte der lateinischen Literatur, Vol. 1, Monachium.
De Mauro T., 1965, ‘Il nome del dativo e la teoria dei casi greci’, Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei (Rendiconti: Classe di Scienze morali, storiche e filologiche), series 8, Vol. 20, pp. 151-211.
Montanari E., 1988, La sezione linguistica del „Peri hermeneias” di Aristotele, II. Il commento, Firenze.
Murray G., 1948, ‘The Beginnings of Grammar, or First Attempts at a Science of Language in Greece’, [in:] G. Murray, Greek Studies, Oxford, pp. 171-191.
Pagliaro A., 1955, ‘Il capitolo linguistico della Poetica di Aristotele’, Ricerche Linguistiche, No. 3, pp. 1-55.
Pohlenz M., 1939, ‘Die Begründung der abendländischen Sprachlehre durch die Stoa’, Nachrichten von der Gesellschaft der Wissenschaften zu Göttingen. Philologisch-Historische Klasse, Fachgruppe 1: Altertumswissenschaft, Neue Folge, Bd. 3, Nr. 6, pp. 151-198.
Primavesi O., 1994, ‘Casus – ptosis. Zum aristotelischen Ursprung eines umstrittenen grammatischen Terminus’, Antike und Abendland, Nr. 40, pp. 86-97.
Robins R. H., 1951, Ancient & Mediaeval Grammatical Theory in Europe (with particular reference to modern linguistic doctrine), London.
Ross W. D. (ed.), 1928, The Works of Aristotle, trans. W. A. Pickard-Cambridge, Vol. 1, Oxford.
Schwyzer E., Debrunner A., 1950, Griechische Grammatik, Vol. 2, München.
Steinthal H., 1891, Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bei den Griechen und Römern, Berlin.
Thorp J., 1989, ‘Standing up Falling down. Aristotle and the history of grammar’, Echos du Monde Classique / Classical Views, No. 33, pp. 315-331.
Trendelenburg F. A., 1836, ‘Accusativi nomen quid tandem sibi velit’, Acta Societatis Graecae, Vol. 1, pp. 117-124.
Uhlig G., 1883, ‘Dionysii Thracis Ars Grammatica (Te)’, Grammatici Graeci, Vol. 1, No. 1, Lipsiae (= D.T.)
Uhlig G. (ed.), 1910, ‘Apollonii Dyscoli Pei Sintazeos’, Grammatici Graeci, Vol. 2, No. 2, Lipsiae.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
