Byzantine Scholiasts on the Description of the Grammatical Category of the Noun Number in Τέχνη γραμματική Attributed to Dionysius Thrax

Authors

  • Hubert Wolanin Jagiellonian University, Kraków

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.27.2024.27.17

Keywords:

Greek grammarians, Dionysius Thrax, Techne grammatike, scholia, grammatical number

Abstract

The article cites passages from Τέχνη γραμματική which characterise the grammatical category of the noun number (ἀριθμοὶ ὀνομάτων) and define two classes of nouns, i.e. collective nouns (ὀνόματα περιληπτικά) and distributive (pro)nouns (ὀνόματα ἐπιμεριζόμενα), which are closely related to the category of the number. Subsequently, the passages are confronted with the comments of Byzantine scholiasts on them, quoted from A. Hilgard’s scholia edition. Familiarisation with and interpretation of the analysed scholia made it possible to demonstrate the way in which the model description of the grammatical noun number as well as the characteristics of collective nouns and distributive pronouns, contained in the textbook, were received in the circle of Byzantine grammarians. In particular, focus was put on the scholiasts’ choice in regard to which of the passages required further explanation or complement, and what explanations or complements thereof were formulated in the scholia, as well as which statements were met with objections or criticism from Byzantine commentators, what where the reasons behind those, and what were the suggested corrections. The analyses conducted, though limited to selected issues, allow for at least a partial understanding of the specificity of the grammatical education in the Byzantine Empire and the nature of the Byzantine discourse on the content of Τέχνη.

PlumX Metrics of this article

References

Hertz M., 1855, Prisciani Grammatici Caesariensis Institutionum Grammaticarum Libri XVIII, vol. 2: Libros I–XII Continens, M. Hertz (ed.), Lipsiae.

Hilgard A., 1889, Theodosii Alexandrini Canones de Flexione Nominum et Verborum. Georgii Choerobosci Prolegomena et Scholia in Canones de Flexione Nominum, A. Hilgard (ed.), Lipsiae.

Hilgard A., 1894, Prolegomena. Georgii Choerobosci. Prolegomena et Scholia in Canones de Flexione Verborum. Sophronii Excerpta ex Ioannis Characis Commentariis in Canones, A. Hilgard (ed.), Lipsiae.

Hilgard A., 1901, Scholia in Dionysii Thracis artem grammaticam, A. Hilgard (ed.), Lipsiae.

Kemp A.J., 1986, ‘The Tekhnē Grammatikē of Dionysius Thrax: English Translation with Introduction and Notes’, [in:] The History of Linguistics in the Classical Period, D.J. Taylor (ed.), Amsterdam, pp. 169–190, https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.46.10kem. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/sihols.46.10kem

Murray A.T., 1919, Homer, The Odyssey, vol. 1–2, transl. A.T. Murray, London.

Murray A.T., 1924, Homer, The Iliad, vol. 1–2 , transl. A.T. Murray, London.

Uhlig G., 1883, Dionysii Thracis Ars Grammatica, G. Uhlig (ed.), Lipsiae.

Uhlig G., 1910, Apollonii Dyscoli De constructione libri quattuor, G. Uhlig (ed.), Lipsiae.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Wolanin, H. “Byzantine Scholiasts on the Description of the Grammatical Category of the Noun Number in Τέχνη γραμματική Attributed to Dionysius Thrax”. Classica Cracoviensia, vol. 27, Dec. 2024, pp. 407-42, doi:10.12797/CC.27.2024.27.17.

Issue

Section

Classica Linguistica