The Discourse on the Difference Between Audacity and Real Fortitude in De bellis by Procopius of Caesarea
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.27.2024.27.13Keywords:
Procopius of Caesarea, audacity, fortitude, courage, virtueAbstract
In De bellis by Procopius of Caesarea, there are multiple, though quite dispersed, instances of a discourse concentrated thematically on the distinction between true fortitude and audacity, with the latter being a mere semblance of the former, and actually a vice that is just the opposite of fortitude. The weight of this discourse comes from the role played by the virtue of fortitude in Procopius’ vision of history – being, on the one hand, the proper motive for preserving the remembrance of martial deeds and, on the other hand, the human-related factor that makes the greatest impact on the course of history. To understand this discourse properly, we need to abandon modern insights (with the mediaeval origin) expressed by concepts such as ‘courage’ and ‘bravery’ that blurred the boundary between virtue and emotion. Analysis of this discourse points to a relationship between real fortitude and prudence/integrity, while audacity is related to cowardice in the sense that it turns into the latter instantly in the face of danger (a stereotypical characteristic of villains in Antiquity). Likewise, seeking a certain death would be an act of audacity, not fortitude. However, a closer analysis of individual cases within this discourse shows a surprising rule: nearly all of them are examples of the moral philosophy applied in a perverse manner, to justify often disgraceful acts. Procopius himself, even though considering the reckless risking of one’s life as unworthy of fortitude, looks with admiration on all those who choose fighting until the end over accepting the shame of surrender (including also the opponents of Rome such as Vandals, Goths, and Persians). It appears then that the Late-Antique historiographer had already viewed the Platonic-Aristotelean distinction of fortitude and audacitywith some reserve, being closer in spirit to a new conception of fortitude, later on to be expressed by the term ‘courage’.
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Arnold J.J., 2014, Theoderic and the Roman Imperial Restoration, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107294271. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107294271
Ayto J., 1990, Bloomsbury Dictionary of Word Origins, London.
Bassi K., 2003, ‘The Semantics of Manliness in Ancient Greece’, [in:] Andreia: Studies in Manliness and Courage in Classical Antiquity, R.M. Rosen, I. Sluiter (eds), Leiden, pp. 25–58, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400738_003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400738_003
Basso F., Greatrex G., 2017, ‘How to Interpret Procopius’ Preface in the Wars’, [in:] Procopius of Caesarea: Literary and Historical Interpretations, Ch. Lillington-Martin, E. Turquois (eds), London–New York, pp. 59–72, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602288-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315602288-5
Borri F., 2023, ‘Savage Dreams: Militant Masculinity between Antiquity and the Middle Ages’, [in:] Masculinities in Early Medieval Europe: Tradition and Innovation, 450–1050, F. Borri, C. La Rocca, F. Veronese (eds), Turnhout, pp. 113–125, https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SCISAM-EB.5.135241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SCISAM-EB.5.135241
Brodka D., 2004, Die Geschichtsphilosophie in der spätantiken Historiographie.
Studien zu Prokopios von Kaisareia, Agathias von Myrina und Theophylaktos Simokattes, Frankfurt am Main.
Brodka D., 2011, ‘Prokopios und Malalas über die Schlacht bei Callinicum (19.04.531)’, Classica Cracoviensia 14, pp. 71–93.
Brodka D., 2015, Prokopiusz z Cezarei, Historia wojen, vol. 2: Wojny z Gotami (ks. V–VIII), transl., introd., comm. D. Brodka, Kraków.
Brodka D., 2022, Prokop von Caesarea, Hildesheim–Zürich–New York.
Czekalski T., 2014, ‘Trwoga na polu bitwy – wybrane aspekty dziewiętnastowiecznych dyskusji o żołnierskim strachu’, Prace Historyczne 141/4, pp. 863–870, https://doi.org/10.4467/20844069PH.14.043.2941.
Dewing H.B., 1919, Procopius, History of the Wars, vol. 3: Books V–VI.15, transl. H.B. Dewing, J. Henderson, G.P. Goold (eds), Cambridge–London (reprint 2000).
Dewing H.B., Kaldellis A., 2014, Procopios, The Wars of Justinian, transl.
H.B. Dewing, revised and modernized, with introduction and notes by A. Kaldellis, Indianapolis–Cambridge.
Greatrex G., 1998, Rome and Persia at War, 502–532, Leeds.
Hughes I., 2009, Belisarius: The Last Roman General, Barnsley.
Kaldellis A., 2004, Procopius of Caesarea: Tyranny, History, and Philosophy at the End of Antiquity, Philadelphia, https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812202410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812202410
Kaldellis A., 2004–2005, ‘Classicism, Barbarism and Warfare: Prokopios and the Conservative Reaction to Later Roman Military Policy’, American Journal of Ancient History 3–4, pp. 189–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31826/9781463213930-010
Klein E., 1971, A Comprehensive Dictionary of the English Language, E. Klein (ed.), Amsterdam–London–New York.
Kruse M., 2017, ‘Archery in the Preface to Procopius’ Wars: A Figured Image of Agonistic Authorship’, Studies in Late Antiquity 1/4, pp. 381–406, https://doi.org/10.1525/sla.2017.1.4.381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/sla.2017.1.4.381
Leppin H., 2011, Justinian. Das Christliche Experiment, Stuttgart.
Liddell H.G., Scott R., 1996, A Greek-English Lexicon: With a Revised Supplement, H.G. Liddell, R. Scott (eds), Oxford.
Meier M., 2004, ‘Zur Funktion der Theodora-Rede in Geschichtswerk Prokops (BP 1,24,33–37)’, Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 147, pp. 88–104.
Onions C.T., Friedrichsen G.W.S, Burchfield R.W., 1966, The Oxford Dictionary of English Etymology, C.T. Onions, G.W.S. Friedrichsen, R.W. Burchfield (eds), Oxford.
Pazdernik Ch., 2006, ‘Xenophon’s Hellenica in Procopius’ Wars: Pharnabazus and Belisarius’, Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 46, pp. 175–206.
Pears D., 1980, ‘Courage as a Mean’, [in:] Essays On Aristotle’s Ethics, A.O. Rorty (ed.), Berkeley, pp. 171–187, https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340985-013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520340985-013
Rawlings L., 1988, ‘Caesar’s Portrayal of Gauls as Warriors’, [in:] Julius Caesar as Artful Reporter: The War Commentaries as Political Instruments, K. Welch, A. Powell (eds), London, pp. 171–192, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvvn9jz.12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvvn9jz.12
Różycki Ł., 2021, Battlefield Emotions in Late Antiquity: A Study of Fear and Motivation in Roman Military Treatises, Leiden–Boston, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004462557. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004462557
Signes Codoñer J., 2003, Kaiserkritik in Prokops Kriegsgeschichte, [in:] Freedom and Its Limits in the Ancient World: Proceedings of a Colloquium Held at the Jagiellonian University, Kraków, September 2003, D. Brodka, J. Janik, S. Sprawski (eds), Kraków, pp. 215–229.
Stachura M., 2022, ‘Żołnierze Justyniana w Afryce – okupanci czy wyzwoliciele?’, Przegląd Historyczno-Wojskowy 4/282, pp. 67–95, https://doi.org/10.32089/WBH.PHW.2022.4(282).0003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32089/WBH.PHW.2022.4(282).0003
Stachura M., 2024a, ‘Niewczesna brawura na polu późnoantycznej bitwy w ocenie Ammiana Marcellina i Prokopiusza z Cezarei’, Prace Historyczne 151/2 (forthcoming).
Stachura M., 2024b, ‘Inspirations from Herodotus Found in Procopius’ Accounton the Fall of the Vandal Kingdom’, [in:] Proceedings of
the 11th
International Symposium on Byzantine and Medieval Studies ‘Days of Justinian’ Skopje 10–12 November 2023 (forthcoming).
Stewart M.E., 2003, Between Two Worlds: Men’s Heroic Conduct in the Writings of Procopius, San Diego.
Stewart M.E., 2014, ‘Contest of Andreia in Procopius’ Gothic Wars’, Parekbolai4, pp. 21–54.
Stewart M.E., 2015, ‘The Andreios Eunuch-Commander Narses: Sign of Decoupling of Martial Virtues and Masculinity in the Early Byzantine Empire?’, Ceræ 2, pp. 1–25.
Stewart M.E., 2016, The Soldier’s Life: Martial Virtues and Manly Romanitasin the Early Byzantine Empire, Leeds.
Stewart M.E., 2017, ‘The Danger of the Soft Life: Manly and Unmanly Romans in Procopius’s Gothic Wars’, Journal of Late Antiquity 10/2, pp. 473–502, https://doi.org/10.1353/jla.2017.0025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jla.2017.0025
Stewart M.E., 2020, Masculinity, Identity, and Power Politics in the Age of Justinian: A Study of Procopius, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hpsx6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048540259
Stewart M.E., 2022, ‘To Triumph Forever: Romans and Barbarians in Early Byzantium’, [in:] The Routledge Handbook on Identity in Byzantium, M.E. Stewart, D. Parnell, C. Whately (eds), London–New York, pp. 107–122, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429031373-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429031373-8
Van Nuffelen P., 2017, ‘The Poetics of Christian History in Late Antiquity’, Studia Patristica 92, pp. 227–246.
Whately C., 2016, Battles and Generals: Combat, Culture, and Didacticism in Procopius’ Wars, Leiden–Boston. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004310384
Weische A., 1966, Studien zur politischen Sprache der römischen Republik, München.
Wirszubski Ch., 1961, ‘Audaces: A Study in Political Phraseology’, Journal of Roman Studies 51/1–2, pp. 12–22, https://doi.org/10.2307/298831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/298831
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
