On some Actual Aspects of the Interpretation of the Liberal Tradition in Russia

Authors

  • Vladimir Gutorov Saint-Petersburg State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.16.2019.62.12

Keywords:

Russia, ideological discourses, liberalism, political culture, political transformation, political theory, postcommunism, anti-liberalism

Abstract

On some Actual Aspects of the Interpretation of the Liberal Tradition in Russia

The article examines the key moments of the transformation of liberal tradition in Russia in the context of analysis of the main directions of the transformation of liberal ideological discourse and liberal culture in Western Europe and the United States. The need for such an analysis is primarily determined by the fact that since the early 1990s Western liberal stereotypes have become an ideological basis of the new Russian political elite and the dominant trend in state propaganda. However, the following main fact is often overlooked: in the 20th century,Russian liberalism was compromised twice, so in the short-term the hopes for the revival of the liberal ideas are gone. In the West, the liberal tradition has also been in the state of crisis: Western liberalism has been undergoing a very significant transformation that has far-reaching cultural and political implications. In particular, at the turn of the 21st c., a more active role in Western public discourse was taken by the radical neo-conservative versions of an ideology that combined a conservative program of political reforms with a strong libertarian (neoliberal) rhetoric. This ideology is actively used by the ruling circles of the US and Western Europe to influence ideologically the political elites of Russia – as it happened in Central and Eastern Europe during the so-called “velvet revolutions”. At the same time, what increasingly clearly and sharply came to the fore in the late twentieth century is anti-liberal thought and criticism that has always evolved in parallel with liberalism itself and that almost never ceases to exist.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

PlumX Metrics of this article

References

Beiner R., What’s the Matter with Liberalism?, Berkeley 1995.
Google Scholar

Beyme K. von, Liberalismus. Theorien des Liberalismus und Radikalismus im Zeitalter der Ideologien, 1789-1945, Wiesbaden 2013.
Google Scholar

Beyme K. von, Politische Theorien in Russland, 1789-1945, Wiesbaden 2001.
Google Scholar

Bierdiajew N., Istoki i smysł russkogo kommunizma [The Beginning and Meaning of the Russian Communism], Moskwa 1990.
Google Scholar

Bierdiajew N., Nowoje sriedniewiekowje. Razmyszlenije o sud’bie Rossii i Jewropy [The New Middle Ages. Deliberation on the Fate of Russia and Europe], Moskwa 1990.
Google Scholar

Christman J., Anderson J. (eds), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. New Essays, Cambridge 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610325.002
Google Scholar

Fawcett E., Liberalism. The Life of an Idea, Princeton 2014, https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873654. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400873654
Google Scholar

Freeden M., Liberalism. A Very Short Introduction, Oxford 2015.
Google Scholar

Fukuyama F., The End of History and the Last Man, New York 1992.
Google Scholar

Gaus G., “Ideological Dominance through Philosophical Confusion: Liberalism in the Twentieth Century”, in M. Freeden (ed.), Reassessing Political Ideologies. The Durability of Dissent, London 2001.
Google Scholar

Gradowskij A.D., Sobranije soczinienij [Works], ed. A.A. Szachmatow, vol. 6, Sankt-Pietierburg 1901.
Google Scholar

Henderson D., Anti-Liberalism 2000. The Rise of New Millennium Collectivism, London 2001.
Google Scholar

Kahn P.W., Putting Liberalism in Its Place, Princeton 2005.
Google Scholar

Kawielin K., Gosudarstwo i obszczina [State and Community], eds W.B. Trofimowa, O.A. Płatonow, Moskwa 2013.
Google Scholar

MacIntyre A., Whose Justice? Which Rationality?, Notre Dame, Ind. 1988.
Google Scholar

Manifiesty russkogo libieralizma. Problemy idiealizma. Wiechi. Iz głubiny [Manifestos of the Russian Idealism. The Problems of Idealism. Milestones. De Profundis], ed. W.W. Sapow, Moskwa 2009.
Google Scholar

Mannheim K., Ideology and Utopia. An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge, London 1998.
Google Scholar

Mieszczerskij W.P., Za wielikuju Rossiju. Protiw libieralizma [For the Great Russia. Against Liberalism], eds Ju.W. Klimakow, O.A. Płatonow, Moskwa 2010.
Google Scholar

Narveson J., Dimock S. (eds), Liberalism. New Essays on Liberal Themes, Dordrecht 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-9440-0
Google Scholar

Remarque E.M., Arc de Triomphe. Roman, Köln 1988.
Google Scholar

Shils E., Tradition, Chicago 1981.
Google Scholar

Thompson W., Ideologies in the Age of Extremes: Liberalism, Conservatism, Communism, Fascism 1914-91, New York 2011.
Google Scholar

Walicki A., The Flow of Ideas. Russian Thought from the Enlightenment to the Religious-Philosophical Renaissance, Frankfurt am Main 2015, https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04270-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-653-04270-2
Google Scholar

Wolf-Devine C., “The Hegemonic Liberalism of Susan Moller Okin”, in Ch. Wolfe (ed.), Liberalism at the Crossroads. An Introduction to Contemporary Liberal Political Theory and Its Critics, Second Edition, Lahnam 2003.
Google Scholar

Downloads

Published

2019-10-31

How to Cite

Gutorov, Vladimir. 2019. “On Some Actual Aspects of the Interpretation of the Liberal Tradition in Russia”. Politeja 16 (5(62):209-22. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.16.2019.62.12.

Funding data