Analyzing Televised Presidential General Election Debates
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/AdAmericam.17.2016.17.15Keywords:
visual rhetoric, general election presidential debates, presidential debates, TVAbstract
This paper describes how general election presidential debates have changed over the last four decades. It will trace the development of the debate format, the dynamics of visual rhetoric, and the patterns of discourse; and will compare the standards followed by John F. Kennedy and Richard M. Nixon in the first series of general election presidential debates held in 1960, with those followed by Barack Obama and Mitt Romney in the latest series of debates held in 2012. It will also analyze debate videos and transcripts in order to identify the techniques used during both series of debates, and emphasize the similarities, differences, and effectiveness thereof. Considering the growing influence of the media on presidential campaigns over the last forty years, it is assumed that the rules and format for debates, as well as the dynamics of visual rhetoric and functions of debate discourse, have changed. This stands in contrast to the role of such debates in managing and guiding public opinion during elections, which has remained the same.
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Bartels, Larry M. “Priming and persuasion in presidential campaigns.” Capturing campaign effects. Eds. Brady, Henry E., Richard Johnston. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2006.78-112. Print.
Benoit, Willaim L. “Determinants of Defense in Presidential Debates.” Communication Research Reports 24. 4 (2007): 319-325. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090701624221
Benoit, Willaim L., et al. Functions of campaign ’96: Acclaiming, attacking, and defending discourse. Westport: Praeger, 1998. Print.
Benoit, Willaim L., et al. The primary decision: A functional analysis of debates in presidential primaries. Westport: Praeger, 2002. Print.
Benoit, William L., et al. “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Viewing U.S. Presidential Debates.” Communication Monographs 70. 4 (2003): 335-350. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0363775032000179133
Benoit, William L., William T. Wells. Candidates in conflict: Persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1996. Print.
Commission on Presidential Debates. Debate Transcripts. Web. 15 October 2014.
Commission on Presidential Debates. Debate Videos. Web. 15 October 2014.
Dimou, Nikolaos. “2012 American Presidential Debates: A Rhetorical Analysis.” Nick “the Greek” Dimou. 30 March 2014. Web. 15 October 2014.
Gallup. Presidential Debates Rarely Game-Changers. 25 September 2008. Web. 15 October 2014.
Geer, John G. “The effects of presidential debates on the electorate’s preferences for candidates.” American Politics Research 16 (1998): 486-501. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/004478088016004005
Iyengar, Shanto, Donald R. Kinder. News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. Print.
Kraus, Sidney. Televised presidential debates and public policy. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988. Print.
Lanoue, David J., Peter R. Schrott. The joint press conference. New York: Greenwood, 1991. Print.
Lau, Richard R., David P. Redlawsk. How voters decide: Information processing during election campaigns. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791048
Lemert, James B. “Do televised presidential debates help inform voters?” Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 37 (1993): 83-94. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08838159309364205
McCombs, Maxwell E., Donald L. Shaw. “The agenda setting function of mass media.” Public Opinion Quarterly 36. 2 (1972): 176–187. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
McCombs, Maxwell. Setting the agenda: The mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004. Print.
McKinney, Mitchell S., Diana B. Carlin. “Political Campaign Debates.” Handbook of political communication research. Ed. Kaid, Lynda Lee. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004. 203-234. Print.
McQuail, Denis. Media Performance. Mass Communication and the Public Interest. London: Sage Publications, 1992. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22230/cjc.1993v18n4a783
Miller, Arthur H., Michael MacKuen. “Informing the electorate: A national study.” The great debates: Carter vs. Ford 1976. Ed. Sidney Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979. 269-297. Print.
Noelle-Neumann, Elisabeth. The Spiral of Silence: Public Opinion – Our Social Skin. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1993. Print.
Page, Benjamin I., Robert Y. Shapiro. The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226644806.001.0001
Pfau, Michael, et al. “Presidential election campaigns and American democracy: The relationship between communication use and normative outcomes.” American Behavioral Scientist 49 (2005): 48-62. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205279429
Pfau, Michael, Jong G. Kang. “The impact of relational messages on candidate influence in televised political debates.” Communication Studies 42. 1 (1991): 114-128. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10510979109368327
Pfau, Michael. “The influence of intraparty debates on candidate preference.” Communication Research 14 (1987): 1-23. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365087014006004
Sears, David and Steven Chaffee. “Uses and effects of the 1976 debates: An overview of empirical studies.” The great debates: Carter vs. Ford 1976. Ed. Sidney Kraus. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1979. 223-261. Print.
Tsfati, Yariv. “Debating the Debate The Impact of Exposure to Debate News Coverage and Its Interaction with Exposure to the Actual Debate.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 8. 3 (2003): 70-86. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X03008003005
Zhu, Jian-Hua, et al. “Do televised debates affect image perception more than issue knowledge? A study of the first 1992 presidential debate.” Human Communication Research 20 (1994): 302-333. Print. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1994.tb00325.x
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Marta Rzepecka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
