Gratian as optimus princeps – the Literary Image of “an Ideal Emperor” in Gratiarum actio ad Gratianum Imperatorem by D.M. Ausonius and the Laudatio in Gratianum Augustum of Q.A. Symmachus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.26.2023.26.11Keywords:
Decimus Magnus Ausonius, Quintus Aurelius Symmachus, Flavius Gratianus Augustus, Roman laudatory prose of the 4th century AD, orationesAbstract
Ausonius and Symmachus addressed their speeches to the emperor Gratian, the son of Valentinian I. Ausonius included in his gratiarum actio two praises of the young emperor in order to express his gratitude for the consulate he received; Symmachus delivered his laudatio in honour of the ruler at a meeting of the Roman senate. In their speeches both authors showed not so much a real image of Gratian as an individual but rather a literary creation of optimus princeps. Gratian is presented as an ideal that is artificial in its perfection: he loses his individual and true characteristics and appears to be pasted into a panegyric-propaganda scheme based on literary convention as well as the slogans of imperial state ideology. In this article we aim to present the literary image of Gratian as “an ideal emperor”, which emerges from both laudatory speeches, as well as to point out the literary devices, motifs, panegyrical techniques and ideological topoi used in its creation.
PlumX Metrics of this article
References
Primary sources
Decimus Magnus Ausonius, Gratiarum actio ad Gratianum imperatorem, R. Peiper (Hrsg.), Leipzig 1886.
Decimus Magnus Ausonius, ‘Gratiarum actio ad Gratianum imperatorem’, [in:] Opere, A. Pastorino (ed.), Torino 1971, pp. 324–367.
Decimus Magnus Ausonius, ‘Gratiarum actio ad Gratianum imperatorem’, [in:] Works, R.P.H. Green (ed.), Oxford 1991, pp. 146–160. Decimus Magnus Ausonius. Sӓmtliche Werke, Band 2: Trierer Werke, P. Drӓger (ed.), Trier 2011, pp. 164–201 (Gratiarum Actio ad Gratianum Imperatorem), pp. 509–580 (Gratiarum Actio: kommentar).
Quintus Aurelius Symmachus, ‘Oratio III: Laudatio ad Gratianum Augustum’, [in:] Monumenta Germaniae Historica, Auctores Antiquissimi 6, 1, https://www.dmgh.de/auct_ant.htm.
Secondary sources
Asche U., 1983, Roms Weltherschaftsidee und Außenpolitik in der Spӓtantike im Spiegel der Panegyrici Latini, Bonn.
Beck H., 2007, ‘The Early Roman Tradition’, [in:] A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography, vol. 1, J. Marincola (ed.), Oxford, pp. 259–265, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405185110.ch21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405185110.ch21
Beranger L., 1970, ‘L’expression de la divinité dans les Panégyriques Latins’, Museum Helveticum 27, pp. 242–254.
Blockley R.C., 1975, Ammianus Marcellinus: A Study of His Historiography and Political Thought, Brussels.
Brandt A., 1999, Moralische Werte in den „Res gestae” des Ammianus Marcellinus, Gӧttingen. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666252198
Brodka D., 1998, Die Romideologie in der rӧmischen Literatur der Spӓtantike, Frankfurt am Main.
Bruggisser Ph., 1989, ‘Gratien, nouveau Romulus’, [in:] Historia Testis. Mélanges d’épigraphie, d’historie ancienne et de philologie, T. Zavadski et al. (éds.), Fribourg, pp. 189–205.
Burgersdijk D., 2020, ‘Neoplatonic Philosophy in Tetrarchic and Constantinian Panegyric’, [in:] Imperial Panegyric from Diocletian to Honorius, A. Omissi, A.J. Ross (eds), Liverpool, pp. 167–188.
Cameron A., 2011, The Last Pagans of Rome, Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780199747276.001.0001.
Carey C., 1994, ‘Rhetorical Means of Persuasion’, [in:] Greek Rhetoric in Action, I. Worthington (ed.), London – New York, pp. 26–45.
Chenault R., 2020, ‘Roman and Gallic in the Latin Panegyrics of Symmachus and Ausonius’, [in:] Imperial Panegyric from Diocletian to Honorius, A. Omissi, A.J. Ross (eds), Liverpool, pp. 189–208.
Demandt A., 1965, Zeitkritik Und Geschichtsbild im Werk Ammians, Bonn.
Doignon J., 1966, ‘Le titre nobilissimus puer porté par Gratien et la mystique des origins de Rome à l’Evénement des Valentiniens’, [in:] Mélanges d’archéologie et d’histoire offerts à André Piganiol, vol. 3, R. Chevallier (éd.), Paris, pp. 1693–1709.
Fears J.R., 1981, ‘The Cult of Virtutes and Roman Imperial Ideology’, [in:] Religion (Heidentum: Rӧmische Gӧtterkulte, Orientalische Kulte in der rӧmischen Welt [Forts.]), W. Haase (ed.), Berlin, pp. 827–948, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110850680-007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110850680-007
Green R.P.H., 1991, The Works of Ausonius, Oxford, pp. XV–XLIX.
Hermann M., 2021, Prawdopodobieństwo w retoryce antycznej, Toruń.
Jones A.H.M. et al., 1971, The Prosopography of the Later Roman Empire, vol. 1 (260–395 AD), Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4347658
Kay N.M., 2001, Ausonius. Epigrams. Text with Introduction and Commentary, London.
Kelly G., 2013, ‘Pliny and Symmachus’, Arethusa 46/2, pp. 261–287, https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2013.0013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/are.2013.0013
Kienast D, 1996, Rӧmische Kaisertabelle. Grundzüge einer rӧmischen Kaiserchronologie, Darmstadt.
Korenjak M., 2000, Publikum und Redner. Ihre Interaktion in der sophistischen Rhetorik der Kaiserzeit, München.
Krynicka T., 2010, ‘Decymus MagnusAuzoniusz. Mowa dziękczynna na cześć cesarza Gracjana (Gratiarum actio dicta domino Gratiano Augusto, CPL 1393)’, Vox Patrum 30, pp. 919–955, https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.4375. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/vp.4375
Krynicka T., 2014, Decymus Auzoniusz Magnus w świetle własnych utworów,Pelplin.
Lausberg H., 1960, Handbuch der literarischen Rhetorik, München.
Lenski N., 1997, ‘Initium mali Romano imperio: Contemporary Reactions to the Battle of Adrianople’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 127, pp. 129–168, https://doi.org/10.2307/284390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/284390
Levene D.S., 1997, ‘God and Man in the Classical Latin Panegyric’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 43, pp. 66–103, https://doi. org/10.1017/S0068673500002157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500002157
L’Huillier M.C., 1986, ‘La figure de l’empereur et les vertus imperiales. Crises et modelès d’identité dans les Panégyriques Latins’, [in:] Les Grandes figures religieuses: fonctionnement, pratique et symbolique dans l’Antiquité, M.M. Mactoux (éd.), Paris, pp. 529–582.
Lind L.R., 1979, ‘The Tradition of Roman Moral Conservatism’, [in:] Studies in Latin Literature and Roman History 1, C. Deroux (ed.), Bruxelles, pp. 7–58. Lippold A., 1969, ‘Herrscherideal und Traditionsverbundenheit im Panegyricus des Pacatus’, Historia 17, pp. 228–250.
Lolli M., 1999, ‘La celebritas principis nei Panegyrici Latini’, Latomus 58, pp. 620–625.
Lolli M., 2006, ‘Ausonius: die “Gratiarum actio ad Gratianum imperatorem” und «De maiestatis laudibus». Lobrede auf den Herrscher oder auf den Lehrer?’, Latomus 65, pp. 707–726.
Manzanares C.V., 2001, Pisarze wczesnochrześcijańscy I–VII w., transl. E. Burska, Warszawa.
Maranesi A., 2016, Vincere la memoria, construire il potere. Constantino, i retori, la lode dell’autorità e l’autorità della lode, Milan.
Mause M., 1994, Die Darstellung des Kaisers in der lateinischen Panegyrik, Stuttgart.
McEvoy M.A., 2013, Child Emperor Rule in the Late Roman West, AD 367–455, Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664818.001.0001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199664818.001.0001
Miozga S., 2008, Konserwatyzm ideowy rzymskiej arystokracji senatorskiej późnego cesarstwa w pismach Kwintusa Aureliusza Symmacha, unpublished PhD diss., Kraków.
Mleczek A., 2018, Dekadencja moralna społeczeństwa rzymskiego w Res Gestae Ammiana Marcellina, Kraków.
Mleczek A. 2020, ‘Julian the Apostate’s Religious Policy and Renovatio Imperii Morumque in the Res Gestae of Ammianus Marcellinus’, Classica Cracoviensia 23, pp. 77–116, https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.23.2020.23.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.23.2020.23.04
Mleczek A., 2022, ‘Relationes 10–12 of Quintus Aurelius Symmachus as an Elogium to Commemorate Vettius Agorius Praetextatus’, Classica Cracoviensia 25, pp. 73–96, https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.25.2022.25.04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.25.2022.25.04
Moroni B., 2006, ‘L’imperatore e il letterato nel Cento Nuptialis di Ausonio’, Acme: Annali della Facoltà di lettere e filosofia dell’Università degli studi di Milano 59/3, pp. 71–100.
Nӓf B., 1995, Senatorisches Standesbewusstsein in spӓtrӧmischer Zeit, Freiburg.
Neri V., 1984, Constanzo, Giuliano e l’ideale del civilis princeps nelle storie di Ammiano Marcellino, Roma.
Nixon C.E.V., Saylor Rodgers B., 1994, In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini: Introduction, Translation and Historical
Commentary with the Latin Text of R.A.B. Mynors, Berkeley, https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520342828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520342828
Olszaniec S., 2007, Comites consistoriani w wieku IV. Studium prosopograficzne elity dworskiej Cesarstwa Rzymskiego 320–395 n.e., Toruń.
Omissi A., 2020, ‘Civil War and the Late Roman Panegyrical Corpus’, [in:] Imperial Panegyric from Diocletian to Honorius, A. Omissi, A. J. Ross (eds), Liverpool, pp. 211–231.
Omissi, A., Ross A.J., 2020, Imperial Panegyric from Diocletian to Honorius, A. Omissi, A.J. Ross (eds), Liverpool.
Pabst A., 1989, Quintus Aurelius Symmachus. Reden, Darmstadt.
Pastorino A., 1971, Opere di Decimo Magno Ausonio, Torino.
Pernot L., 2003, La rhétorique de l’éloge dans la monde gréco-romain, Paris.
Pernot L., 2015, Epideictic Rhetoric: Questioning the Stakes of Ancient Praise, Austin, https://doi.org/10.7560/768208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7560/768208
Rees R., 1998, ‘The Private Lives of Public Figures in Latin Prose Panegyric’, [in:] The Propaganda of Power. The Role of Panegyric in Late Antiquity, M.Whitby(ed.),Leiden–Boston–Kӧln,pp.77–101,https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004351479_005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004351479_005
Rees R., 2010, ‘The Form and Function of Narrative in Panegyric’, [in:] Form and Function in Roman Oratory, D.H. Berry, A. Erskine (eds), Cambridge, pp. 105–121.
Riu X., 2013, ‘La place du vraisemblable dans la littérature grecque’, Pallas 91, pp. 49–60, https://doi.org/10.4000/pallas.377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/pallas.377
Rogowski J., 2009, ‘Nauczyciel cesarza. Auzoniusz w Gratiarum Actio’, Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latinae 19, pp. 249–279.
Sabbah G., 1984, ‘De la rhétorique à la communication politique. Les Panégyriques latins’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 43, pp. 363–388, https://doi.org/10.3406/bude.1984.1678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/bude.1984.1678
Saylor Rodgers B., 1986, ‘Divine Insinuation in the Panegyrici Latini’, Historia 35, pp. 69–104.
Sogno C., 2006, Q. Aurelius Symmachus. A Political Biography, Ann Arbor, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.135836. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.135836
Valensi L., 1957, ‘Quelques réflexions sur le pouvoir impérial d’après Ammien Marcellin’, Bulletin de l’Association Guillaume Budé 16/4, pp. 62–107, https://doi.org/10.3406/bude.1957.4167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3406/bude.1957.4167
Ware C., 2014, ‘The Severitas of Constantine: Imperial Virtues in Panegyrici Latini 7(6) and 6(7)’, Journal of Late Antiquity 7/1, pp. 86–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jla.2014.0008
Ware C., 2017, ‘Speaking of Kings and Battles: Virgil as Prose Panegyrist in Late Antiquity’, Proceedings of the Virgil Society 29, pp. 1–29.
Ware C., 2019, ‘Panegyric and the Discourse of Praise in Late Antiquity’, Journal of Roman Studies 109, pp. 291–304 [1–14], https://doi.org/10.1017/S0075435819000868. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0075435819000868
Wistrand E., 1987, Felicitas imperatoria, Gӧteborg.
Zieske L., 1972, Felicitas. Eine Wortuntersuchung, Hamburg.
Ziółkowski A., 2009, Historia powszechna. Starożytność, Warszawa.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
