Ulysses and His peregrini amores in the Latin Love Elegy

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12797/CC.27.2024.27.03

Keywords:

Ulysses, Odysseus, Latin love elegy, Propertius, Ovid, love, epic

Abstract

This article aims to trace the ‘unfaithful Ulysses’ motif in the Latin love elegy of the Augustan era. Roman elegists deconstruct Ulysses’s epic profile by turning his resourcefulness, his most celebrated virtue in epic poetry, into a vice; as a result, the elegiac Ulysses is a cunning sailor who charms women at every port he stops at, always being at the ready to sail away. This image of the epic hero is assessed in two conflicting ways: he is either judged for his insolent erotic behaviour, or he is applauded as the ideal ‘casual lover’, enviable to lovers who are unable to resist their self-destructing, obsessive passions.

PlumX Metrics of this article

References

Barchiesi A., 1986, ‘Problemi d’interpretazione in Ovidio. Continuità delle storie, continuazione dei testi’, Materiali e discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 16, pp. 77–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/40235859

Bartol K., 2017, ‘Was Calypso Able to Make Odysseus Immortal?’, Symbolae Philologorum Posnaniensium Graecae et Latine 27/2, pp. 5–16, https://doi.org/10.14746/sppgl.2017.XXVII.2.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/sppgl.2017.XXVII.2.1

Bennett A.W., 1972, ‘The Elegiac Lie: Propertius 1.15’, Phoenix 26/1, pp. 28–39, https://doi.org/10.2307/1087207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1087207

Beye Ch.R., 1982, Epic and Romance in the Argonautica of Apollonius, Carbondale–Edwardsville.

Boucher J.-P., 1965, Études sur Properce: problèmes d’inspiration et d’art, Paris.

Boyd Β.W., 2016, ‘Ovid’s Circe and the Revolutionary Power of carmina in the Remedia amoris’, [in:] Roman Literary Cultures: Domestic Politics, Revolutionary Poetics, Civic Spectacle, A. Keith, J. Edmondson (eds), Toronto–Buffalo–London, pp. 111–123, https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442629684-010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442629684-010

Bright D.F., 1971, ‘A Tibullan Odyssey’, Arethusa 4/2, pp. 197–214.

Brunelle Ch., 2002, ‘Pleasure, Failure and Danger: Reading Circe in the Remedia’, Helios 29/1, pp. 55–68.

Butler H.E., Barber E.A., 1996, The Elegies of Propertius, H.E. Butler, E.A. Barber (eds), Hildesheim–New York.

Camps W.A., 1961, Propertius, Elegies: Book I, Cambridge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511552519

Casali S., 2009, ‘Ovidian Intertextuality’, [in:] A Companion to Ovid, P.E. Knox (ed.), Chichester– Malden, pp. 341–354, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310627.ch24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310627.ch24

Clarke J., 2004, ‘“Goodbye to All That”: Propertius’ magnum iter between Elegies 3.16 and 3.21’, Mouseion 4/2, pp. 127–143. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mou.2004.0000

Davis J.T., 1973, ‘Propertius’ Periclum in 1.15’, The Classical Journal 68/2, pp. 134–137.

de Saint-Denis E., 1935, Le rôle de la mer dans la poésie latine, Paris.

Fedeli P., 1977, ‘Properzio 1.15: Arte allusiva e interpretazione’, [in:] Colloquium Propertianum, Assisi, 26–28 marzo 1976, M. Bigaroni, F. Santucci (eds), Assise, pp. 73–99.

Gaisser J.H., 1977, ‘Mythological Exempla in Propertius 1.2 and 1.15’, American Journal of Philology 98/4, pp. 381–391, https://doi.org/10.2307/293800. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/293800

Galinsky G.K., 1975, Ovid’s Metamorphoses: An Introduction to the Basic Aspects, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4348299

Ganiban R.T., 2009, ‘The Dolus and Glory of Ulysses in Aeneid 2’, Materialie discussioni per l’analisi dei testi classici 61, pp. 57–70.

Gardner H.H., 2008, ‘Women’s Time in the Remedia Amoris’, [in:] Latin Elegy and Narratology: Fragments of Story, G. Liveley, P. Salzman-Mitchell (eds), Columbus, pp. 68–85.

Graverini L., 2014, ‘Calypso’s Emotions’, Studi Italiani di Philologia Classica 107/1, pp. 80–95.

Griffin J., 1980, Homer on Life and Death, Oxford.

Harrison S., 2013, ‘Time, Place and Political Background’, [in:] The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy, Th.S. Thorsen (ed.), Cambridge, pp. 133–150, https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139028288.013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139028288.013

Heslin P., 2018, Propertius, Greek Myth, and Virgil: Rivalry, Allegory, and Polemic, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199541577.001.0001

Heyworth S.J., 2007, Cynthia: A Companion to the Text of Propertius, S.J. Heyworth (ed.), Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199228706.book.1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780199228706.book.1

Hogan J.C., 1976, ‘The Temptation of Odysseus’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 106, pp. 187–210, https://doi.org/10.2307/284099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/284099

Jacobson H., 1974, Ovid’s Heroides, Princeton.

Keith A., 2022, ‘Women’s Travels in Latin Elegy’, [in:] Travel, Geography, and Empire in Latin Poetry, M.Y. Myers, E.Z. Damer (eds), London–New York, pp. 81–97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003120773-5-5

Kennedy D.F., 1984, ‘The Epistolary Mode and the First of Ovid’s Heroides’, The Classical Quarterly 34/2, pp. 413–422, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800031049. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009838800031049

Larosa B., 2014, ‘Conjugal Fidelity and Mythical Parallels in Ovid’s Exile Poetry: Continuity and Evolution of Literary Models’, Latomus 73/2, pp. 368–384.

Lipking L., 1988, Abandoned Women and Poetic Tradition, Chicago.

McKeown J.C., 1987 , Ovid: Amores: Text, Prolegomena and Commentary, vol. 1 , Liverpool–Wolfeboro.

O’Connor J.F., 1975, ‘Odysseus the Liar’, The Classical Outlook 53/4, pp. 41–43.

Papanghelis Th.D., 2009, Propertius: A Hellenistic Poet on Love and Death, Cambridge–New York.

Peradotto J., 1993, ‘The Social Control of Sexuality: Odyssean Dialogics’, Arethusa 26/2, pp. 173–182.

Putnam M.C.J., 1980, ‘Propertius’ Third Book: Patterns of Cohesion’, Arethusa 13/1, pp. 97–113.

Reinhardt K., 1996, ‘The Adventures in the Odyssey’, [in:] Reading the Odyssey: Selected Interpretive Essays, S.L. Schein (ed.), Princeton, pp. 63–132, https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214146-006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691214146-006

Richardson L. jr., 2006, Propertius: Elegies I–IV, jr. L. Richardson (ed.), Norman.

Rosati G., 1989, Ovidio. Lettere di eroine. Introduzione, traduzione e note, Milan.

Sharrock A.R., 1987, ‘Ars Amatoria 2.123–42: Another Homeric Scene in Ovid’, Mnemosyne 40/3, pp. 406–412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156852587X00535

Sharrock A.R., 1994, Seduction and Repetition in Ovid’s Ars Amatoria II, Oxford. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198149590.001.0001

Skinner M.B., 2014, Sexuality in Greek and Roman Culture, Malden.

Stanford W.B, 1985, The Ulysses Theme: A Study in the Adaptability of a Traditional Hero, New York.

Verducci F., 1985, Ovid’s Toyshop of the Heart: Epistulae Heroidum, Princeton. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400854912

Wohl V.J., 1993, ‘Standing by the Stathmos: The Creation of Sexual Ideology in the Odyssey’, Arethusa 26/1, pp. 19–50.

Woodhouse W.J., 1930, The Composition of Homer’s Odyssey, Oxford.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Christidou, D. “Ulysses and His Peregrini Amores in the Latin Love Elegy”. Classica Cracoviensia, vol. 27, Dec. 2024, pp. 67-83, doi:10.12797/CC.27.2024.27.03.

Issue

Section

Classica et Byzantina litteraria eorumque receptio